Comparison of Hybribio-H13 and Hybrid Capture® 2 human papillomavirus tests for detection of CIN2+ and CIN3.

María Cecilia Agudelo, Edmundo Torres-González, Samuel Agudelo, Arianis Tatiana Ramírez, Kelly Melisa Castañeda, Connor J Kinslow, María Rodríguez-Herrera, Lisa Garland, Yi Xie, Carlos Alberto Orozco, Mark Stoler, Michael Dean, Gloria Inés Sánchez
{"title":"Comparison of Hybribio-H13 and Hybrid Capture® 2 human papillomavirus tests for detection of CIN2+ and CIN3.","authors":"María Cecilia Agudelo, Edmundo Torres-González, Samuel Agudelo, Arianis Tatiana Ramírez, Kelly Melisa Castañeda, Connor J Kinslow, María Rodríguez-Herrera, Lisa Garland, Yi Xie, Carlos Alberto Orozco, Mark Stoler, Michael Dean, Gloria Inés Sánchez","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.7061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-cost, accurate high-risk HPV tests are needed for cervical cancer screening in limited-resource settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of the low-cost Hybribio-H13 test with the Hybrid Capture® 2 to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN2 and CIN3).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Archived baseline samples tested by the Hybrid Capture® 2 from women of the ASCUS-COL trial, aged 20 to 69 years, with biopsy-colposcopy directed diagnosis of CIN2+ (n = 143), CIN3+ (n = 51), and < CIN2 (n = 632) were blindly tested by the Hybribio-H13 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative sensitivity of the Hybribio-H13 test versus the Hybrid Capture® 2 for detecting CIN2+ was 0.89 (90% CI = 0,80-0,98; NIT = 0,66), and for CIN3+ was 0,92 (90% CI = 0,85-0,98; NIT = 0,35). Relative specificity was 1.19 (90% CI = 1.05-1.33; NIT <0.00001). In the analysis restricted to women older than 30 years, the relative sensitivity of the Hybribio-H13 for CIN3+ was marginally below unity (ratio = 0.97; 90% CI = 0.95-0.99), and the specificity remained higher than the Hybrid Capture® 2 test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Hybribio-H13 test was as specific as the Hybrid Capture® 2 for detecting CIN2+ or CIN3+ but less sensitive. Considering these results and the young age of the population recruited for screening because of ASCUS cytology, we suggest our results warrant the evaluation of the Hybribio-H13 for screening cervical cancer, especially in the evaluated population.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":"44 Sp. 1","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.7061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low-cost, accurate high-risk HPV tests are needed for cervical cancer screening in limited-resource settings.

Objective: To compare the performance of the low-cost Hybribio-H13 test with the Hybrid Capture® 2 to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 (CIN2 and CIN3).

Materials and methods: Archived baseline samples tested by the Hybrid Capture® 2 from women of the ASCUS-COL trial, aged 20 to 69 years, with biopsy-colposcopy directed diagnosis of CIN2+ (n = 143), CIN3+ (n = 51), and < CIN2 (n = 632) were blindly tested by the Hybribio-H13 test.

Results: The relative sensitivity of the Hybribio-H13 test versus the Hybrid Capture® 2 for detecting CIN2+ was 0.89 (90% CI = 0,80-0,98; NIT = 0,66), and for CIN3+ was 0,92 (90% CI = 0,85-0,98; NIT = 0,35). Relative specificity was 1.19 (90% CI = 1.05-1.33; NIT <0.00001). In the analysis restricted to women older than 30 years, the relative sensitivity of the Hybribio-H13 for CIN3+ was marginally below unity (ratio = 0.97; 90% CI = 0.95-0.99), and the specificity remained higher than the Hybrid Capture® 2 test.

Conclusion: The Hybribio-H13 test was as specific as the Hybrid Capture® 2 for detecting CIN2+ or CIN3+ but less sensitive. Considering these results and the young age of the population recruited for screening because of ASCUS cytology, we suggest our results warrant the evaluation of the Hybribio-H13 for screening cervical cancer, especially in the evaluated population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybribio-H13 和 Hybrid Capture® 2 人类乳头瘤病毒检测试剂盒在检测 CIN2+ 和 CIN3 方面的比较。
导言:在资源有限的环境中,宫颈癌筛查需要低成本、准确的高危HPV检测:比较低成本的 Hybribio-H13 检测试剂盒与 Hybrid Capture® 2 检测 2 级或 3 级宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN2 和 CIN3)的性能:用Hybrid Capture® 2检测的基线样本来自ASCUS-COL试验的妇女,年龄在20-69岁之间,活检-阴道镜检查诊断为CIN2+(143人)、CIN3+(51人)和< CIN2(632人):Hybribio-H13检验与Hybrid Capture® 2相比,检测CIN2+的相对灵敏度为0.89(90% CI = 0.80-0.98;NIT = 0.66),检测CIN3+的相对灵敏度为0.92(90% CI = 0.85-0.98;NIT = 0.35)。相对特异性为 1.19(90% CI = 1.05-1.33;NIT 结论):在检测 CIN2+ 或 CIN3+ 方面,Hybribio-H13 检测仪与 Hybrid Capture® 2 检测仪的特异性相同,但灵敏度较低。考虑到这些结果以及因 ASCUS 细胞学结果而被招募进行筛查的人群年龄较小,我们建议对 Hybribio-H13 进行评估,以筛查宫颈癌,尤其是在被评估人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Controversies in neuroimmunology: Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating disorders Acute pancreatitis due to Leptospira spp.: An uncommon case report of a common zoonosis Evaluation of the quality of vaginal discharge smear analysis reporting in five clinical laboratories in the Colombian Pacific Region Relationship between susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases and genetic factors in populations exposed to mercury in Medellín, Colombia Crataegus mexicana root-based supplement intoxication in a woman with weight loss persistent preoccupation: Case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1