Comparison of QCT and DEXA findings for lumbar vertebra in young adults and the elderly.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/02841851241257524
Güneş Açikgöz, Aydın Bora, Süreyya Nur
{"title":"Comparison of QCT and DEXA findings for lumbar vertebra in young adults and the elderly.","authors":"Güneş Açikgöz, Aydın Bora, Süreyya Nur","doi":"10.1177/02841851241257524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methods are important for the diagnosis and follow-up of osteoporosis, and are used especially in cases to determine the degree of osteoporosis and the risk of fracture, monitoring the effectiveness of the treatment applied.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the parameters measured using the DEXA method from the lumbar (L1-L4) vertebrae and the Hounsfield unit (HU) values measured with QCT at the same levels among young adults and the elderly.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 155 patients (age range = 26-93 years). A total of 57 (36.8%) patients (age range = 26-64 years) were defined as the first group, and 98 (63.2%) patients (aged ≥65 years) were defined as the second group. T-test and correlation analysis were performed to compare bone mineral density (BMD), T score, and HU values measured using DEXA and QCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant difference was found between T score, lumbar total BMD, and HU values according to age and sex (<i>P</i> < 0.05). When the values measured from lumbar vertebrae were compared using both DEXA and CT, a high correlation was found between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the study, it was observed that QCT attenuation measurements of the lumbar spine measured between different age groups provided reliable results in terms of BMD scanning, as in DEXA. It should be noted that QCT has a longer imaging time and higher radiation dose compared to DEXA, and unnecessary scans should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241257524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methods are important for the diagnosis and follow-up of osteoporosis, and are used especially in cases to determine the degree of osteoporosis and the risk of fracture, monitoring the effectiveness of the treatment applied.

Purpose: To compare the parameters measured using the DEXA method from the lumbar (L1-L4) vertebrae and the Hounsfield unit (HU) values measured with QCT at the same levels among young adults and the elderly.

Material and methods: The study included 155 patients (age range = 26-93 years). A total of 57 (36.8%) patients (age range = 26-64 years) were defined as the first group, and 98 (63.2%) patients (aged ≥65 years) were defined as the second group. T-test and correlation analysis were performed to compare bone mineral density (BMD), T score, and HU values measured using DEXA and QCT.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found between T score, lumbar total BMD, and HU values according to age and sex (P < 0.05). When the values measured from lumbar vertebrae were compared using both DEXA and CT, a high correlation was found between them.

Conclusion: In the study, it was observed that QCT attenuation measurements of the lumbar spine measured between different age groups provided reliable results in terms of BMD scanning, as in DEXA. It should be noted that QCT has a longer imaging time and higher radiation dose compared to DEXA, and unnecessary scans should be avoided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较青壮年和老年人腰椎的 QCT 和 DEXA 检测结果。
背景:使用双能 X 射线吸收测量法(DEXA)和定量计算机断层扫描法(QCT)对骨质疏松症的诊断和随访非常重要,尤其是在确定骨质疏松症程度和骨折风险、监测治疗效果的情况下使用。目的:比较用 DEXA 方法测量的腰椎(L1-L4)参数和用 QCT 在青壮年和老年人中测量的同一水平的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)值:研究包括 155 名患者(年龄范围 = 26-93 岁)。共有 57 名(36.8%)患者(年龄范围 = 26-64 岁)被定义为第一组,98 名(63.2%)患者(年龄≥65 岁)被定义为第二组。对使用 DEXA 和 QCT 测量的骨矿密度(BMD)、T 评分和 HU 值进行了 T 检验和相关分析:结果:根据年龄和性别,T 评分、腰椎总 BMD 和 HU 值之间的差异有统计学意义(P研究发现,与 DEXA 一样,QCT 对不同年龄组腰椎的衰减测量也能提供可靠的 BMD 扫描结果。值得注意的是,与 DEXA 相比,QCT 的成像时间更长,辐射剂量更高,因此应避免不必要的扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
A survey of bridging bone on chest radiography shows a greater than expected prevalence of marginal syndesmophytes. Can the second phase of contrast-enhanced MRA of the neck provide additional information in the acute stroke setting? Inter-reader agreement of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm among three readers with different seniorities for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy. Visual assessment of cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics using 3D T2-weighted SPACE sequence-based classification system. Correlation between common iliac vein geometry and the risk of deep vein thrombosis in patients with May-Thurner syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1