METS-IR/HOMA-IR and MAFLD in U.S. adults: dose-response correlation and the effect mediated by physical activity.

Abstract

Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), a globally prevalent disease, is closely linked to insulin resistance (IR). Physical activity (PA) is closely linked to both MAFLD and IR. We aim to explore the dose-response relationship between metabolic score for IR (METS-IR)/homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR) and MAFLD, and investigate the relationship between PA, IR and MAFLD.

Methods: Participants from the NHANES study were included in this cross-section study. Logistic regression and the receiver operating characteristic were used to assess the predictive performance of METS-IR/HOMA-IR for MAFLD. Restrictive cubic splines were performed to visualize their dose-response relationship. Decision tree analysis was used to identify high-risk populations of MAFLD. PA's mediating effect in the association between METS-IR/HOMA-IR and MAFLD was also examined.

Results: Of all 1,313 participants, 693 had MAFLD (52.78%). There were a positive association between METS-IR (OR = 1.162, 95% CI = 1.126-1.199) and HOMA-IR (OR = 1.630, 95% CI = 1.431-1.856) and MAFLD risk. The AUCs of the METS-IR and HOMA-IR were 0.831 (0.809, 0.853) and 0.767 (0.741, 0.791), respectively, with significantly different predictive performance (P < 0.001). Adding METS-IR/HOMA-IR to the basic model greatly improved the statistical significance for MAFLD. Five high-risk subgroups were identified for MAFLD. PA mediated about 0.81% and 0.78% (indirect effect/total effect) in the association between METS-IR/HOMA-IR and MAFLD.

Conclusions: MAFLD risk might be predicted by METS-IR/HOMA-IR, among which METS-IR performed better. And PA mediated the association between them. More attention should be paid to the therapeutic effect of lifestyle changes on MAFLD.

Highlights: 1. Positive associations were found between METS-IR and HOMA-IR and MAFLD risk. 2. METS-IR has better predictive performance for MAFLD risk than HOMA-IR. 3.Two high-risk subgroups were identified for MAFLD by METS-IR: individuals with METS-IR ≥ 40; Hispanic black individuals with 34 ≤ METS-IR < 40 and aged ≥ 46. 4. In the significant association between METS-IR/HOMA-IR and MAFLD, about 0.81% and 0.78% (indirect effect/total effect), respectively, were mediated by physical activity.