Limited Evidence to Support the Use of Intra-Articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid for the Management of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114241265109
James J Butler, Hayden Hartman, Amanda Mener, Nathaniel P Mercer, Grace W Randall, Stephen Petropoulos, Andrew J Rosenbaum, John G Kennedy
{"title":"Limited Evidence to Support the Use of Intra-Articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid for the Management of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.","authors":"James J Butler, Hayden Hartman, Amanda Mener, Nathaniel P Mercer, Grace W Randall, Stephen Petropoulos, Andrew J Rosenbaum, John G Kennedy","doi":"10.1177/24730114241265109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes following intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of hallux rigidus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During April 2024, a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data collected and analyzed were number of patients, patient age, follow-up, subjective clinical outcomes, complications, and failures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were included. In total, 218 patients (218 feet) underwent intra-articular injection of HA at a weighted mean follow-up time of 4.4 ± 1.4 months (range, 3-6). There was an improvement in postinjection visual analog scale (VAS) pain at rest scores, VAS pain during activity scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) scores. In total, 21 complications (10.0%) were observed, the most common of which was transient postinjection pain in 20 patients (9.6%). There were 7 patients (3.2%) who underwent secondary procedures (3.2%). One randomized control trial (RCT) demonstrated no difference in outcomes between an intra-articular injection of HA compared to an intra-articular injection of saline. One RCT demonstrated superior FHSQ scores following between an intra-articular injection of HA compared to an intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review suggests that intra-articular injection of HA for the treatment of hallux rigidus may lead to improved clinical outcomes with a low complication rate at short-term follow-up. However, the low level and quality of evidence underscores the need for further high-quality studies to be conducted to identify the precise role of HA in the treatment of hallux rigidus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"9 3","pages":"24730114241265109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114241265109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes following intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of hallux rigidus.

Methods: During April 2024, a systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data collected and analyzed were number of patients, patient age, follow-up, subjective clinical outcomes, complications, and failures.

Results: Five studies were included. In total, 218 patients (218 feet) underwent intra-articular injection of HA at a weighted mean follow-up time of 4.4 ± 1.4 months (range, 3-6). There was an improvement in postinjection visual analog scale (VAS) pain at rest scores, VAS pain during activity scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) scores. In total, 21 complications (10.0%) were observed, the most common of which was transient postinjection pain in 20 patients (9.6%). There were 7 patients (3.2%) who underwent secondary procedures (3.2%). One randomized control trial (RCT) demonstrated no difference in outcomes between an intra-articular injection of HA compared to an intra-articular injection of saline. One RCT demonstrated superior FHSQ scores following between an intra-articular injection of HA compared to an intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide.

Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that intra-articular injection of HA for the treatment of hallux rigidus may lead to improved clinical outcomes with a low complication rate at short-term follow-up. However, the low level and quality of evidence underscores the need for further high-quality studies to be conducted to identify the precise role of HA in the treatment of hallux rigidus.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持关节腔内注射透明质酸治疗拇指外翻的证据有限:系统回顾
背景:本系统性综述旨在评估关节内注射透明质酸(HA)治疗硬下疳的疗效:本系统综述旨在评估关节内注射透明质酸(HA)治疗硬下疳的疗效:方法:2024 年 4 月,根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库进行了系统综述。收集和分析的数据包括患者人数、患者年龄、随访情况、主观临床结果、并发症和失败:结果:共纳入五项研究。共有218名患者(218只脚)接受了HA关节内注射,加权平均随访时间为4.4±1.4个月(3-6个月)。注射后静息时疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、活动时疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)评分和足部健康状况问卷(FHSQ)评分均有改善。共观察到 21 例并发症(10.0%),其中最常见的是 20 例患者(9.6%)注射后出现短暂疼痛。有 7 名患者(3.2%)接受了二次手术(3.2%)。一项随机对照试验(RCT)显示,关节内注射 HA 与关节内注射生理盐水的结果没有差异。一项随机对照试验显示,与关节内注射曲安奈德相比,关节内注射HA后的FHSQ评分更高:本系统性综述表明,关节内注射HA治疗僵直性拇指外翻可改善临床疗效,且短期随访的并发症发生率较低。然而,由于证据的水平和质量较低,因此需要进一步开展高质量的研究,以确定 HA 在治疗僵直性拇指外翻中的确切作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
Incidence and Timing of Foot Injury Diagnosis in Polytrauma Patients: A Retrospective Registry-Based Study. Percutaneous Flexor Tenotomy Plus Plantar Capsule Release for Rigid Hammertoe: A Cadaveric Study. Gamekeeper's Toe: A Case Series and Review of Surgically Treated Traumatic Hallux Varus Due to Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury. Body Mass Index and Outcomes After Pilon Fracture Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Chronic Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Increased Health Care Utilization Following Ankle Fracture Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1