Longitudinal Cough Frequency Monitoring in Persistent Coughers: Daily Variability and Predictability.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s00408-024-00734-x
Kian Fan Chung, Carlos Chaccour, Lola Jover, Mindaugas Galvosas, Woo-Jung Song, Matthew Rudd, Peter Small
{"title":"Longitudinal Cough Frequency Monitoring in Persistent Coughers: Daily Variability and Predictability.","authors":"Kian Fan Chung, Carlos Chaccour, Lola Jover, Mindaugas Galvosas, Woo-Jung Song, Matthew Rudd, Peter Small","doi":"10.1007/s00408-024-00734-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We determined the cough counts and their variability in subjects with persistent cough for 30 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Hyfe cough tracker app uses the mobile phone microphone to monitor sounds and recognizes cough with artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms. We analyzed the daily cough counts including the daily predictability rates of 97 individuals who monitored their coughs over 30 days and had a daily cough rate of at least 5 coughs per hour.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (median) daily cough rates varied from 6.5 to 182 (6.2 to 160) coughs per hour, with standard deviations (interquartile ranges) varying from 0.99 to 124 (1.30 to 207) coughs per hour among all subjects. There was a positive association between cough rate and variability, as subjects with higher mean cough rates (OLS) have larger standard deviations. The accuracy of any given day for predicting all 30 days is the One Day Predictability for that day, defined as the percentage of days when cough frequencies fall within that day's 95% confidence interval. Overall Predictability was the mean of the 30-One Day Predictability percentages and ranged from 95% (best predictability) to 30% (least predictability).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial within-day and day-to-day variability for each subject with persistent cough recorded over 30 days. If confirmed in future studies, the clinical significance and the impact on the use of cough counts as a primary end-point of cough interventions of this variability need to be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18163,"journal":{"name":"Lung","volume":" ","pages":"561-568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11427503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-024-00734-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We determined the cough counts and their variability in subjects with persistent cough for 30 days.

Methods: The Hyfe cough tracker app uses the mobile phone microphone to monitor sounds and recognizes cough with artificial intelligence-enabled algorithms. We analyzed the daily cough counts including the daily predictability rates of 97 individuals who monitored their coughs over 30 days and had a daily cough rate of at least 5 coughs per hour.

Results: The mean (median) daily cough rates varied from 6.5 to 182 (6.2 to 160) coughs per hour, with standard deviations (interquartile ranges) varying from 0.99 to 124 (1.30 to 207) coughs per hour among all subjects. There was a positive association between cough rate and variability, as subjects with higher mean cough rates (OLS) have larger standard deviations. The accuracy of any given day for predicting all 30 days is the One Day Predictability for that day, defined as the percentage of days when cough frequencies fall within that day's 95% confidence interval. Overall Predictability was the mean of the 30-One Day Predictability percentages and ranged from 95% (best predictability) to 30% (least predictability).

Conclusion: There is substantial within-day and day-to-day variability for each subject with persistent cough recorded over 30 days. If confirmed in future studies, the clinical significance and the impact on the use of cough counts as a primary end-point of cough interventions of this variability need to be assessed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续咳嗽患者的纵向咳嗽频率监测:日变异性和可预测性
目的:我们测定了持续咳嗽 30 天的受试者的咳嗽次数及其变异性:Hyfe 咳嗽跟踪器应用程序使用手机麦克风监测声音,并通过人工智能算法识别咳嗽。我们分析了在 30 天内对咳嗽进行监测且每天咳嗽次数至少为每小时 5 次的 97 人的每天咳嗽次数,包括每天的可预测率:所有受试者的日平均咳嗽次数(中位数)为每小时 6.5 至 182 次(6.2 至 160 次),标准差(四分位间距)为每小时 0.99 至 124 次(1.30 至 207 次)。咳嗽率与变异性之间存在正相关,因为平均咳嗽率(OLS)越高的受试者标准偏差越大。任何一天预测所有 30 天的准确性就是该天的 "一天预测率",即咳嗽频率在该天 95% 置信区间内的天数百分比。总预测率是 30 个 "一天预测率 "百分比的平均值,从 95%(最佳预测率)到 30%(最低预测率)不等:结论:每个受试者在 30 天内持续咳嗽的日内和日间变异性很大。如果在今后的研究中得到证实,则需要评估这种变异性的临床意义以及对使用咳嗽次数作为咳嗽干预的主要终点的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lung
Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lung publishes original articles, reviews and editorials on all aspects of the healthy and diseased lungs, of the airways, and of breathing. Epidemiological, clinical, pathophysiological, biochemical, and pharmacological studies fall within the scope of the journal. Case reports, short communications and technical notes can be accepted if they are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated with Corticosteroid Adherence in Sarcoidosis. Percent Predicted vs. Absolute Six-Minute Walk Distance as Predictors of Lung Transplant-Free Survival in Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Collagen-V and K-α-1 Tubulin Antibodies as Potential Markers of Unsuspected GERD-Related Lung Damage: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Analysis. IgG Concentrations Distinguish People with Cystic Fibrosis and Mycobacterium abscessus. Impact of Functional Status at the Time of Transplant on Short-Term Pediatric Lung Transplant Outcomes in the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1