Health literacy in physical trauma patients : Evaluation of the general understanding of patients in an outpatient clinic using the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3
Alexandra Christ, Oskar Bamer, Jesse Seilern Und Aspang, Silke Aldrian, Johannes Herold, Thomas Haider
{"title":"Health literacy in physical trauma patients : Evaluation of the general understanding of patients in an outpatient clinic using the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy.","authors":"Alexandra Christ, Oskar Bamer, Jesse Seilern Und Aspang, Silke Aldrian, Johannes Herold, Thomas Haider","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health literacy (HL) refers to the ability to understand and process information provided by the healthcare system and depends on various factors, such as language comprehension, education, and social environment. Low HL was recently associated with increased readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known about HL levels in physical trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine general HL in physical trauma patients in an outpatient setting and to evaluate possible differences based on demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 100 physical trauma patients were recruited in the outpatient trauma facility of the Medical University of Vienna. All recruited patients completed the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy (S-TOFHLA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluated HL index ranged between 20 and 36 points (highest achievable score: 36 points), with the mean value calculated at 34.3 (adequate). Out of 100 participants, 97 patients (97%) showed adequate HL and 3 patients (3%) reached a score corresponding to a marginal understanding. No patient showed inadequate HL utilizing the S‑TOFHLA tool. No significant differences were found between different demographic categories, including age, education level, native language, and injury location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, included outpatient trauma patients demonstrated an overall adequate understanding of healthcare related information. Age, sociodemographic background, and/or educational status did not influence performance, which leads to the question as to whether the German version of the S‑TOFHLA is valid to representatively measure HL in these patients. Furthermore, regarding the obvious shortcomings of the S‑TOFHLA, the education standard of the respective population should be taken into consideration when choosing an appropriate testing tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02389-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health literacy (HL) refers to the ability to understand and process information provided by the healthcare system and depends on various factors, such as language comprehension, education, and social environment. Low HL was recently associated with increased readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Little is known about HL levels in physical trauma patients. The aim of this study was to determine general HL in physical trauma patients in an outpatient setting and to evaluate possible differences based on demographic characteristics.

Material and methods: A total of 100 physical trauma patients were recruited in the outpatient trauma facility of the Medical University of Vienna. All recruited patients completed the German Short Test of Functional Health Literacy (S-TOFHLA).

Results: The evaluated HL index ranged between 20 and 36 points (highest achievable score: 36 points), with the mean value calculated at 34.3 (adequate). Out of 100 participants, 97 patients (97%) showed adequate HL and 3 patients (3%) reached a score corresponding to a marginal understanding. No patient showed inadequate HL utilizing the S‑TOFHLA tool. No significant differences were found between different demographic categories, including age, education level, native language, and injury location.

Conclusion: In this study, included outpatient trauma patients demonstrated an overall adequate understanding of healthcare related information. Age, sociodemographic background, and/or educational status did not influence performance, which leads to the question as to whether the German version of the S‑TOFHLA is valid to representatively measure HL in these patients. Furthermore, regarding the obvious shortcomings of the S‑TOFHLA, the education standard of the respective population should be taken into consideration when choosing an appropriate testing tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体创伤患者的健康素养 :使用德国功能性健康知识简短测试评估门诊患者的一般理解能力。
背景:健康素养(HL)是指理解和处理医疗保健系统提供的信息的能力,取决于多种因素,如语言理解能力、教育程度和社会环境。最近,低健康素养与再入院率、发病率和死亡率的增加有关。人们对身体创伤患者的 HL 水平知之甚少。本研究旨在确定门诊肢体创伤患者的一般 HL,并评估基于人口特征的可能差异:材料和方法:维也纳医科大学创伤门诊共招募了 100 名身体创伤患者。所有被招募的患者均完成了德国功能性健康素养简短测试(S-TOFHLA):结果:所评估的健康素养指数介于 20 到 36 分之间(可达到的最高分:36 分),平均值为 34.3(足够)。在 100 名参与者中,97 名患者(97%)表现出充分的 HL,3 名患者(3%)达到了边缘理解的分数。没有患者在使用 S-TOFHLA 工具时表现出不充分的 HL。年龄、教育水平、母语和受伤地点等不同人口统计类别之间没有发现明显差异:在这项研究中,门诊创伤患者对医疗保健相关信息的理解总体上是充分的。年龄、社会人口背景和/或教育状况并不影响患者的表现,这就引出了一个问题,即德国版 S-TOFHLA 是否能有效地测量这些患者的 HL。此外,鉴于 S-TOFHLA 的明显缺陷,在选择合适的测试工具时应考虑到相应人群的教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
期刊最新文献
Gastrointestinal function and pain outcomes following segmental resection or discoid resection for low rectal endometriosis. Olfaction and thyroid hormones in patients with subjective cognitive decline, non-amnestic and amnestic mild cognitive impairment Neurofibromatosis type 1 adult surveillance form for Austria COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety Deciphering the role of lactate as a prognostic indicator in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1