Bioequivalence and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Orodispersible Tablets and Conventional Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40268-024-00480-8
Manuel Román, Dolores Ochoa, Samuel Martin, Sergio Luquero, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Paula Arranz, Carlos Sánchez
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Orodispersible Tablets and Conventional Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.","authors":"Manuel Román, Dolores Ochoa, Samuel Martin, Sergio Luquero, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Paula Arranz, Carlos Sánchez","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00480-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Orodispersible tablets (ODT) rapidly dissolve in the oral cavity and can improve patient's convenience. This pharmacokinetic study assessed the bioequivalence of a novel 20 mg ODT formulation of bilastine compared with bilastine 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phase I, single-center, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover randomized clinical trial was conducted. The study comprised two periods, in which participants were administered a single oral dose of bilastine 20 mg in the form of ODT as the test product, or conventional tablets as the reference product, and a washout of 7 days between each period. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 h. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals of the C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0-t</sub> were within the acceptance range (80-125%). Safety was evaluated at the follow-up visit (days 4-7 after the second dose) and throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 healthy volunteers were randomized, and 41 completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for both formulations after a single dose of 20 mg. Bilastine ODT and conventional tablets were bioequivalent as the 90% confidence intervals of the test over reference ratios were within the predefined range (80-125%). Both formulations were well tolerated and showed a similar safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bilastine ODT was bioequivalent to the reference treatment formulated as conventional tablets when administered as a single oral dose of 20 mg under fasting conditions. Both formulations showed a similar tolerability and safety profile, with no serious adverse events or significant analytical alterations reported.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>2019-004071-39. Date of authorization: 10 December 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00480-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Orodispersible tablets (ODT) rapidly dissolve in the oral cavity and can improve patient's convenience. This pharmacokinetic study assessed the bioequivalence of a novel 20 mg ODT formulation of bilastine compared with bilastine 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

Methods: A phase I, single-center, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover randomized clinical trial was conducted. The study comprised two periods, in which participants were administered a single oral dose of bilastine 20 mg in the form of ODT as the test product, or conventional tablets as the reference product, and a washout of 7 days between each period. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 h. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals of the Cmax and AUC0-t were within the acceptance range (80-125%). Safety was evaluated at the follow-up visit (days 4-7 after the second dose) and throughout the study.

Results: A total of 42 healthy volunteers were randomized, and 41 completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for both formulations after a single dose of 20 mg. Bilastine ODT and conventional tablets were bioequivalent as the 90% confidence intervals of the test over reference ratios were within the predefined range (80-125%). Both formulations were well tolerated and showed a similar safety profile.

Conclusions: Bilastine ODT was bioequivalent to the reference treatment formulated as conventional tablets when administered as a single oral dose of 20 mg under fasting conditions. Both formulations showed a similar tolerability and safety profile, with no serious adverse events or significant analytical alterations reported.

Trial registration: 2019-004071-39. Date of authorization: 10 December 2019.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比拉斯汀 20 毫克口崩片剂与传统片剂的生物等效性和安全性:在空腹条件下对健康志愿者进行的一项随机、单剂量、两阶段交叉研究。
背景和目的:口腔崩解片(ODT)可在口腔中快速溶解,为患者提供更多便利。本药代动力学研究评估了一种新型比拉斯汀 20 毫克 ODT 制剂与比拉斯汀 20 毫克片剂在健康志愿者空腹条件下的生物等效性:进行了一项 I 期、单中心、开放标签、两阶段、两序列交叉随机临床试验。研究包括两个阶段,在这两个阶段中,参与者分别口服单剂量的比拉斯汀 20 毫克(以 ODT 形式作为试验产品,或以常规片剂形式作为参照产品),每个阶段之间间隔 7 天。如果Cmax和AUC0-t的90%置信区间在接受范围内(80%-125%),则生物等效性成立。在随访(第二次服药后第 4-7 天)和整个研究期间对安全性进行了评估:共有 42 名健康志愿者被随机选中,其中 41 人完成了研究。单次服用 20 毫克后,两种制剂的药代动力学参数相当。比拉斯汀口服片剂和传统片剂的生物等效性是一致的,因为试验与参考比值的90%置信区间在预定范围内(80%-125%)。两种制剂的耐受性良好,安全性相似:在空腹条件下,比拉斯汀口服溶液与常规片剂单次口服20毫克的参照治疗具有生物等效性。两种制剂显示出相似的耐受性和安全性,未报告严重不良事件或重大分析变化。授权日期:2019 年 12 月 10 日:2019年12月10日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Assessment of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP)-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions of Sepiapterin with Curcumin and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Volunteers. Trametinib Sensitivity is Defined by a Myeloid Differentiation Profile in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pharmacokinetics, Mass Balance, and Biotransformation of [14C]tinengotinib, A Novel Multi-target Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects. Comparative Analytical Evaluation of the Proposed Biosimilar FYB206 and its Reference Medicinal Product Keytruda®. Effect of Chronic Dolutegravir Administration on the Trace Amine Profile in Wistar Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1