Utilization of a stepwise model to assess pivotal information for patient decision-making regarding open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.053
Blaise Cochard, Alexandre Lädermann, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Philippe Collin, Xue Ling Chong, Hugo Bothorel, Sean Wei Loong Ho
{"title":"Utilization of a stepwise model to assess pivotal information for patient decision-making regarding open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure.","authors":"Blaise Cochard, Alexandre Lädermann, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Philippe Collin, Xue Ling Chong, Hugo Bothorel, Sean Wei Loong Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The popularity of arthroscopic Latarjet has increased significantly in recent years due to its perceived advantages. The latter include a smaller surgical incision, faster recovery, quicker return to sports, and ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology. Nevertheless, the arthroscopic technique is more technically challenging, has a more significant learning curve, longer operating time and is less cost-effective. The study aimed to identify the various factors influencing patient decision-making between undergoing arthroscopic or open Latarjet using a stepwise questionnaire model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with a primary, whether arthroscopic or open Latarjet procedure were subjected to a stepwise interviewing process and were asked to select between arthroscopic and open approaches at each step.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with a mean age of 28.8±8.8 years old participated in the study. Twenty (40%) consistently selected an arthroscopic approach after analysis of the incision's aspect, whereas 34 (68%) had a final decision different from their initial choice. In addition, out of the 15 patients who chose arthroscopy or were undetermined after presentation of the incisional aspect, 9 (60%) changed their decision to open surgery after presentation of the pros and cons of each approach. Twenty-three (46%) patients were unable to choose and left the choice to their surgeon. The faith in their surgeon and recovery were identified as the two most important factors influencing patients' final decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The minimally invasive nature of arthroscopic incisions was not considered to be more cosmetically appealing than that of a single open incision. The advantages of the arthroscopic procedure may not be as valued by patients as by surgeons. Patients were more interested in the equivalent short- and mid-term outcomes of both approaches and the shorter surgical duration of the open option. It is crucial to adequately inform patients during preoperative counseling to achieve the best consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The popularity of arthroscopic Latarjet has increased significantly in recent years due to its perceived advantages. The latter include a smaller surgical incision, faster recovery, quicker return to sports, and ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathology. Nevertheless, the arthroscopic technique is more technically challenging, has a more significant learning curve, longer operating time and is less cost-effective. The study aimed to identify the various factors influencing patient decision-making between undergoing arthroscopic or open Latarjet using a stepwise questionnaire model.

Methods: All patients with a primary, whether arthroscopic or open Latarjet procedure were subjected to a stepwise interviewing process and were asked to select between arthroscopic and open approaches at each step.

Results: Fifty patients with a mean age of 28.8±8.8 years old participated in the study. Twenty (40%) consistently selected an arthroscopic approach after analysis of the incision's aspect, whereas 34 (68%) had a final decision different from their initial choice. In addition, out of the 15 patients who chose arthroscopy or were undetermined after presentation of the incisional aspect, 9 (60%) changed their decision to open surgery after presentation of the pros and cons of each approach. Twenty-three (46%) patients were unable to choose and left the choice to their surgeon. The faith in their surgeon and recovery were identified as the two most important factors influencing patients' final decisions.

Conclusions: The minimally invasive nature of arthroscopic incisions was not considered to be more cosmetically appealing than that of a single open incision. The advantages of the arthroscopic procedure may not be as valued by patients as by surgeons. Patients were more interested in the equivalent short- and mid-term outcomes of both approaches and the shorter surgical duration of the open option. It is crucial to adequately inform patients during preoperative counseling to achieve the best consensus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用逐步模型评估关键信息,帮助患者就开放式与关节镜 Latarjet 手术进行决策。
背景:近年来,关节镜下 Latarjet 的受欢迎程度大幅提高,这是因为它具有明显的优势。后者包括手术切口更小、恢复更快、更快恢复运动以及能够治疗伴随的关节内病变。然而,关节镜技术在技术上更具挑战性,学习曲线更长,手术时间更长,成本效益更低。本研究旨在采用逐步问卷调查法,找出影响患者决定接受关节镜还是开放式Latarjet手术的各种因素:方法:对所有初次接受关节镜或开放式Latarjet手术的患者进行逐步式访谈,要求患者在每一步选择关节镜或开放式手术:参与研究的 50 名患者的平均年龄为 28.8±8.8 岁。20名患者(40%)在分析切口方面后一致选择了关节镜方法,而34名患者(68%)的最终决定与他们最初的选择不同。此外,在 15 位选择关节镜手术或在介绍切口方面后未确定的患者中,有 9 位(60%)在介绍了每种方法的利弊后改变了他们的决定,转而选择开放手术。23名患者(46%)无法做出选择,将选择权交给了外科医生。对外科医生的信任和康复被认为是影响患者最终决定的两个最重要因素:结论:关节镜切口的微创性并不比单个开放切口更具美感。患者对关节镜手术优势的重视程度可能不及外科医生。患者更看重的是两种方法的短期和中期疗效相当,以及开放式手术时间更短。在术前咨询时充分告知患者以达成最佳共识至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Pseudoparalysis Sponsoring Societies Comparing Postoperative Proprioception of the Glenohumeral Joint Between the Open and the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1