Daniel Pankowski, Kinga Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska, Ewa Pisula, Andrzej M Fal
{"title":"Prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Daniel Pankowski, Kinga Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska, Ewa Pisula, Andrzej M Fal","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>This study aimed to evaluate prevalence rates (PRs) of neurocognitive impairment and its potential moderators among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). <b>Method</b>A systematic review of the available literature and data extraction was undertaken on 6 August 2021, with the update by 14 September 2023, by two reviewers independently. Literature was screened for reported rates of prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in RA patients. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio with the \"meta\" library. <b>Results</b>Twenty-two studies that fulfilled all selection criteria were carefully analyzed. The PR of neurocognitive impairment was 0.49 [0.38-0.61] across all studies included in the review; 0.75 [0.54-0.88] for the MoCA; 0.56 [0.40-0.72] for the MMSE; and 0.26 [0.16-0.38] for comprehensive batteries. The meta-regression results indicated that, depending on the measurement method, the percentage of subjects with positive rheumatoid factor, women ratio, mean age of participants, mean duration of RA, and percentage of domains that had to be impaired to diagnose neurocognitive impairment turned out to be statistically significant moderators. <b>Conclusions</b>Neurocognitive impairment is a clinically relevant condition in many RA patients, and its prevalence is alarming high.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate prevalence rates (PRs) of neurocognitive impairment and its potential moderators among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MethodA systematic review of the available literature and data extraction was undertaken on 6 August 2021, with the update by 14 September 2023, by two reviewers independently. Literature was screened for reported rates of prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in RA patients. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio with the "meta" library. ResultsTwenty-two studies that fulfilled all selection criteria were carefully analyzed. The PR of neurocognitive impairment was 0.49 [0.38-0.61] across all studies included in the review; 0.75 [0.54-0.88] for the MoCA; 0.56 [0.40-0.72] for the MMSE; and 0.26 [0.16-0.38] for comprehensive batteries. The meta-regression results indicated that, depending on the measurement method, the percentage of subjects with positive rheumatoid factor, women ratio, mean age of participants, mean duration of RA, and percentage of domains that had to be impaired to diagnose neurocognitive impairment turned out to be statistically significant moderators. ConclusionsNeurocognitive impairment is a clinically relevant condition in many RA patients, and its prevalence is alarming high.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.