Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility to striated esophageal muscle contraction: Studies with high-resolution manometry.

The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/kjm2.12884
Jui-Sheng Hung, Wei-Yi Lei, Ming-Wun Wong, Chih-Hsun Yi, Tso-Tsai Liu, Chien-Lin Chen
{"title":"Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility to striated esophageal muscle contraction: Studies with high-resolution manometry.","authors":"Jui-Sheng Hung, Wei-Yi Lei, Ming-Wun Wong, Chih-Hsun Yi, Tso-Tsai Liu, Chien-Lin Chen","doi":"10.1002/kjm2.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Striated esophageal muscle contraction (SEC) is important for pharyngeal swallowing and deglutition augmentation against aspiration. Its clinical relevance is unclear in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare SEC in consecutive patients with and without IEM. All eligible patients were evaluated for SEC, primary and secondary peristalsis using high-resolution manometry (HRM) with one mid-esophageal injection port. Primary peristalsis was assessed with 10 5-mL liquid swallows and multiple rapid swallows (MRS), while secondary peristalsis was performed with rapid air injections of 20 mL. All peristatic parameters of HRM were measured, and SEC and its contractile integral (SECI) were evaluated. One hundred and forty patients (59.3% women, mean age 46.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. There was no difference in SECI between patients with and without IEM (p = 0.91). SECI was also similar between patients with and without secondary peristalsis for IEM (p = 0.63) or normal motility (p = 0.80). No difference in SECI was seen between patients with and without MRS for IEM (p = 0.55) or normal motility (p = 0.88). SECI was significantly higher in male patients than female patients in IEM patients (p = 0.01). SECI significantly correlated with age in patients with normal motility (r = -0.31, p = 0.01). Aging may have a negative impact on SEC in patients with normal motility, while gender difference in SECI occurs in IEM patients. Neither secondary peristalsis nor MRS influences SECI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94244,"journal":{"name":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Striated esophageal muscle contraction (SEC) is important for pharyngeal swallowing and deglutition augmentation against aspiration. Its clinical relevance is unclear in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare SEC in consecutive patients with and without IEM. All eligible patients were evaluated for SEC, primary and secondary peristalsis using high-resolution manometry (HRM) with one mid-esophageal injection port. Primary peristalsis was assessed with 10 5-mL liquid swallows and multiple rapid swallows (MRS), while secondary peristalsis was performed with rapid air injections of 20 mL. All peristatic parameters of HRM were measured, and SEC and its contractile integral (SECI) were evaluated. One hundred and forty patients (59.3% women, mean age 46.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. There was no difference in SECI between patients with and without IEM (p = 0.91). SECI was also similar between patients with and without secondary peristalsis for IEM (p = 0.63) or normal motility (p = 0.80). No difference in SECI was seen between patients with and without MRS for IEM (p = 0.55) or normal motility (p = 0.88). SECI was significantly higher in male patients than female patients in IEM patients (p = 0.01). SECI significantly correlated with age in patients with normal motility (r = -0.31, p = 0.01). Aging may have a negative impact on SEC in patients with normal motility, while gender difference in SECI occurs in IEM patients. Neither secondary peristalsis nor MRS influences SECI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无效食管运动与横纹肌收缩的相关性:高分辨率测压法研究。
条状食管肌肉收缩(SEC)对咽部吞咽和防止误吸的脱气功能非常重要。但其与食管运动功能障碍(IEM)患者的临床相关性尚不明确。在这项研究中,我们旨在描述和比较连续患有和未患有 IEM 的患者的 SEC 特征。我们使用高分辨率测压法(HRM)对所有符合条件的患者进行了 SEC、原发性和继发性蠕动评估。原发性蠕动通过 10 次 5 毫升液体吞咽和多次快速吞咽 (MRS) 进行评估,继发性蠕动则通过快速注入 20 毫升空气进行评估。测量了 HRM 的所有蠕动参数,并评估了 SEC 及其收缩积分(SECI)。共纳入 140 名患者(59.3% 为女性,平均年龄为 46.1 ± 13.1 岁)。IEM 患者和非 IEM 患者的 SECI 没有差异(P = 0.91)。有和没有 IEM 继发性蠕动(p = 0.63)或正常蠕动(p = 0.80)的患者之间的 SECI 也相似。对于 IEM(p = 0.55)或正常蠕动(p = 0.88),有 MRS 和没有 MRS 的患者之间的 SECI 没有差异。在 IEM 患者中,男性患者的 SECI 明显高于女性患者(p = 0.01)。在运动正常的患者中,SECI 与年龄明显相关(r = -0.31,p = 0.01)。在肠蠕动正常的患者中,年龄可能对 SEC 有负面影响,而在 IEM 患者中,SECI 存在性别差异。继发性蠕动和 MRS 均不影响 SECI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Models incorporating physical, laboratory and gut metabolite markers can be used to predict severe hepatic steatosis in MAFLD patients. IGF2BP3-dependent N6-methyladenosine modification of USP49 promotes carboplatin resistance in retinoblastoma by enhancing autophagy via regulating the stabilization of SIRT1. Prediction model of in-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning in the early phase of hospitalization. Higher skin sympathetic nerve activity as a potential predictor of overactive bladder in females refractory to oral monotherapy. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 triggers ferroptosis via interaction with FUS to enhance ACSF2 mRNA stabilization in septic acute kidney injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1