{"title":"CIDER: Counterfactual-Invariant Diffusion-based GNN Explainer for Causal Subgraph Inference","authors":"Qibin Zhang, Chengshang Lyu, Lingxi Chen, Qiqi Jin, Luonan Chen","doi":"arxiv-2407.19376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inferring causal links or subgraphs corresponding to a specific phenotype or\nlabel based solely on measured data is an important yet challenging task, which\nis also different from inferring causal nodes. While Graph Neural Network (GNN)\nExplainers have shown potential in subgraph identification, existing methods\nwith GNN often offer associative rather than causal insights. This lack of\ntransparency and explainability hinders our understanding of their results and\nalso underlying mechanisms. To address this issue, we propose a novel method of\ncausal link/subgraph inference, called CIDER: Counterfactual-Invariant\nDiffusion-based GNN ExplaineR, by implementing both counterfactual and\ndiffusion implementations. In other words, it is a model-agnostic and\ntask-agnostic framework for generating causal explanations based on a\ncounterfactual-invariant and diffusion process, which provides not only causal\nsubgraphs due to counterfactual implementation but reliable causal links due to\nthe diffusion process. Specifically, CIDER is first formulated as an inference\ntask that generatively provides the two distributions of one causal subgraph\nand another spurious subgraph. Then, to enhance the reliability, we further\nmodel the CIDER framework as a diffusion process. Thus, using the causal\nsubgraph distribution, we can explicitly quantify the contribution of each\nsubgraph to a phenotype/label in a counterfactual manner, representing each\nsubgraph's causal strength. From a causality perspective, CIDER is an\ninterventional causal method, different from traditional association studies or\nobservational causal approaches, and can also reduce the effects of unobserved\nconfounders. We evaluate CIDER on both synthetic and real-world datasets, which\nall demonstrate the superiority of CIDER over state-of-the-art methods.","PeriodicalId":501309,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.19376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inferring causal links or subgraphs corresponding to a specific phenotype or
label based solely on measured data is an important yet challenging task, which
is also different from inferring causal nodes. While Graph Neural Network (GNN)
Explainers have shown potential in subgraph identification, existing methods
with GNN often offer associative rather than causal insights. This lack of
transparency and explainability hinders our understanding of their results and
also underlying mechanisms. To address this issue, we propose a novel method of
causal link/subgraph inference, called CIDER: Counterfactual-Invariant
Diffusion-based GNN ExplaineR, by implementing both counterfactual and
diffusion implementations. In other words, it is a model-agnostic and
task-agnostic framework for generating causal explanations based on a
counterfactual-invariant and diffusion process, which provides not only causal
subgraphs due to counterfactual implementation but reliable causal links due to
the diffusion process. Specifically, CIDER is first formulated as an inference
task that generatively provides the two distributions of one causal subgraph
and another spurious subgraph. Then, to enhance the reliability, we further
model the CIDER framework as a diffusion process. Thus, using the causal
subgraph distribution, we can explicitly quantify the contribution of each
subgraph to a phenotype/label in a counterfactual manner, representing each
subgraph's causal strength. From a causality perspective, CIDER is an
interventional causal method, different from traditional association studies or
observational causal approaches, and can also reduce the effects of unobserved
confounders. We evaluate CIDER on both synthetic and real-world datasets, which
all demonstrate the superiority of CIDER over state-of-the-art methods.