Meals for the dead: investigating Romano-British accessory vessels in burials using organic residue analysis

IF 2.1 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s12520-024-02048-8
Julie Dunne, Edward Biddulph, Lucy J. E. Cramp, Caitlin Greenwood, Enid Allison, Jeremy Evans, Richard Helm, Bekky Hillman, Malcolm Lyne, Nigel Page, Caroline Rann, Richard P. Evershed
{"title":"Meals for the dead: investigating Romano-British accessory vessels in burials using organic residue analysis","authors":"Julie Dunne,&nbsp;Edward Biddulph,&nbsp;Lucy J. E. Cramp,&nbsp;Caitlin Greenwood,&nbsp;Enid Allison,&nbsp;Jeremy Evans,&nbsp;Richard Helm,&nbsp;Bekky Hillman,&nbsp;Malcolm Lyne,&nbsp;Nigel Page,&nbsp;Caroline Rann,&nbsp;Richard P. Evershed","doi":"10.1007/s12520-024-02048-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accessory vessels, including platters, dishes, beakers, flagons, jars, and amphorae, are a common feature of Romano-British burials, raising questions as to their provenance; for example, were such vessels recycled from the domestic sphere or made specially for funerary purposes? Furthermore, uncertainty surrounds their purpose: did they contain foods for the deceased, possibly for their final journey to the underworld? Interestingly, organic residue analysis of vessels from Baginton, a site adjacent to The Lunt fort, Coventry, an early (mid to late first century) Roman military cremation cemetery did not yield evidence for food offerings and may have reflected the use of seconds or damaged vessels in burials, perhaps to provide a symbolic meal. In contrast, here we provide, for the first time, direct chemical and isotopic evidence for ‘meals for the dead’, comprising mainly dairy products, often mixed with leafy plants, extracted from somewhat unusual accessory vessels found in a small, enclosed inhumation cemetery, perhaps associated with a family group, which dates to the late (third to late fourth century, or early fifth century A.D) in urban Canterbury. Thus, we can confirm that accessory vessels found in later Romano-British burials were, in this instance, used in the laying out of funerary meals, presumably to nourish the soul on the journey to the underworld. These preliminary insights on vessel use and burial practices across the span of the Roman occupation of Britain thus provide a strong hint at the diversity of Roman burial practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12520-024-02048-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02048-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessory vessels, including platters, dishes, beakers, flagons, jars, and amphorae, are a common feature of Romano-British burials, raising questions as to their provenance; for example, were such vessels recycled from the domestic sphere or made specially for funerary purposes? Furthermore, uncertainty surrounds their purpose: did they contain foods for the deceased, possibly for their final journey to the underworld? Interestingly, organic residue analysis of vessels from Baginton, a site adjacent to The Lunt fort, Coventry, an early (mid to late first century) Roman military cremation cemetery did not yield evidence for food offerings and may have reflected the use of seconds or damaged vessels in burials, perhaps to provide a symbolic meal. In contrast, here we provide, for the first time, direct chemical and isotopic evidence for ‘meals for the dead’, comprising mainly dairy products, often mixed with leafy plants, extracted from somewhat unusual accessory vessels found in a small, enclosed inhumation cemetery, perhaps associated with a family group, which dates to the late (third to late fourth century, or early fifth century A.D) in urban Canterbury. Thus, we can confirm that accessory vessels found in later Romano-British burials were, in this instance, used in the laying out of funerary meals, presumably to nourish the soul on the journey to the underworld. These preliminary insights on vessel use and burial practices across the span of the Roman occupation of Britain thus provide a strong hint at the diversity of Roman burial practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亡者之餐:利用有机残留物分析调查墓葬中的罗马-英国附属器皿
包括盘子、碟子、烧杯、旗壶、罐子和双耳瓶在内的辅助器皿是罗马-英国墓葬的常见特征,这就引起了人们对其来源的疑问:例如,这些器皿是从家庭中回收的,还是专门为殡葬目的而制造的?此外,这些器皿的用途也不确定:它们是否装有死者的食物,可能是为他们最后的冥界之旅准备的?有趣的是,对考文垂伦特堡附近的巴金顿遗址(一个早期(1 世纪中后期)罗马军事火葬墓地)出土的器皿进行的有机残留物分析并没有发现供奉食物的证据,这可能反映了在墓葬中使用秒器或损坏的器皿,或许是为了提供象征性的食物。与此相反,我们在这里首次提供了 "死者膳食 "的直接化学和同位素证据,这些膳食主要包括奶制品,通常与植物叶片混合在一起,是从坎特伯雷市区一个小型封闭式遗骸墓地中发现的有点不寻常的附属器皿中提取出来的,该墓地可能与一个家族群体有关,其年代可追溯到公元三世纪末至四世纪末或五世纪初。因此,我们可以确认,在后来的罗曼-不列颠墓葬中发现的附属器皿在这种情况下是用来摆放葬餐的,大概是为了滋养灵魂前往冥界的旅程。因此,这些关于罗马人占领不列颠期间器皿使用和墓葬习俗的初步见解为罗马人墓葬习俗的多样性提供了有力的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
期刊最新文献
Epigravettian barbed points from Vlakno cave (Croatia): the earliest evidence for barbed point technology in the Adriatic Tracing metallurgical links and silver provenance in Balkan coinage (5th -1st centuries BCE) Multi-analysis technique researches the painting materials and technics of polychrome arhat statue in Lingyan Temple, Shandong Province, China Detecting the waves of southward culture diffusion along the eastern margin of Tibetan Plateau during the Neolithic and Bronze Age: a sarcophagus burial perspective Algorithms for biodistance analysis based on various squared Euclidean and generalized Mahalanobis distances combined with probabilistic hierarchical cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1