Resilient riverine social–ecological systems: A new paradigm to meet global conservation targets

WIREs Water Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1002/wat2.1753
Denielle Perry, Sarah Praskievicz, Ryan McManamay, Alark Saxena, Kerry Grimm, Nicolas Zegre, Lucas Bair, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Richard Rushforth
{"title":"Resilient riverine social–ecological systems: A new paradigm to meet global conservation targets","authors":"Denielle Perry, Sarah Praskievicz, Ryan McManamay, Alark Saxena, Kerry Grimm, Nicolas Zegre, Lucas Bair, Benjamin L. Ruddell, Richard Rushforth","doi":"10.1002/wat2.1753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity set forth the 30 × 30 target, an agenda for countries to protect at least 30% of their terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas by 2030. With &lt;6 years to reach that goal, riverine conservation professionals are faced with the difficult decision of prioritizing which rivers or river segments should be conserved (protected and/or restored). While incorporating resilience into conservation planning is essential for enhancing, restoring, and maintaining the vital riverine ecosystem services (ES) most threatened by climate change and other environmental and human stresses, this paradigm is at odds with traditional conservation approaches that are either opportunistic or reactionary, where only unique and highly visible ecosystems have been prioritized. Barriers to implementing resilience‐based riverine conservation planning include: (1) difficulties in conceptualizing and quantifying resilience; (2) insufficient consideration of the social components of riverine systems; (3) the inapplicability of terrestrial‐only conservation models to aquatic systems; and (4) the traditional ad hoc and opportunistic approach to conservation. To overcome these barriers, we propose a resilience‐based riverine conservation framework that includes: (1) assessing riverine resilience using indicator frameworks; (2) considering rivers as dynamically coupled social–ecological systems; (3) explicitly incorporating terrestrial–aquatic network connectivity into conservation decision‐making; and (4) strategic systems planning using a novel resilience–conservation matrix as a tool. This framework has the potential to transform conservation practices around the globe to more effectively protect river systems and enhance their resilience to climate change and human development.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Water and Life &gt; Conservation, Management, and Awareness</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Science of Water &gt; Water and Environmental Change</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Human Water &gt; Water Governance</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501223,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Water","volume":"204 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity set forth the 30 × 30 target, an agenda for countries to protect at least 30% of their terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas by 2030. With <6 years to reach that goal, riverine conservation professionals are faced with the difficult decision of prioritizing which rivers or river segments should be conserved (protected and/or restored). While incorporating resilience into conservation planning is essential for enhancing, restoring, and maintaining the vital riverine ecosystem services (ES) most threatened by climate change and other environmental and human stresses, this paradigm is at odds with traditional conservation approaches that are either opportunistic or reactionary, where only unique and highly visible ecosystems have been prioritized. Barriers to implementing resilience‐based riverine conservation planning include: (1) difficulties in conceptualizing and quantifying resilience; (2) insufficient consideration of the social components of riverine systems; (3) the inapplicability of terrestrial‐only conservation models to aquatic systems; and (4) the traditional ad hoc and opportunistic approach to conservation. To overcome these barriers, we propose a resilience‐based riverine conservation framework that includes: (1) assessing riverine resilience using indicator frameworks; (2) considering rivers as dynamically coupled social–ecological systems; (3) explicitly incorporating terrestrial–aquatic network connectivity into conservation decision‐making; and (4) strategic systems planning using a novel resilience–conservation matrix as a tool. This framework has the potential to transform conservation practices around the globe to more effectively protect river systems and enhance their resilience to climate change and human development.This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Science of Water > Water and Environmental Change Human Water > Water Governance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有复原力的河流社会生态系统:实现全球保护目标的新模式
联合国《生物多样性公约》提出了 30 × 30 目标,要求各国在 2030 年前保护至少 30% 的陆地、内陆水域、沿海和海洋区域。距离实现这一目标还有 6 年时间,河流保护专业人员面临着一个艰难的决定,即确定哪些河流或河段应优先得到保护(保护和/或恢复)。虽然将复原力纳入保护规划对于加强、恢复和维持受气候变化及其他环境和人类压力威胁最大的重要河流生态系统服务 (ES) 至关重要,但这种模式与传统的保护方法相悖,传统的保护方法要么是机会主义的,要么是反应式的,只有独特和高度可见的生态系统才被列为优先考虑的对象。实施基于恢复力的河流保护规划的障碍包括(1) 难以概念化和量化复原力;(2) 对河流系统的社会因素考虑不足;(3) 仅适用于陆地的保护模式不适用于水生系统;(4) 传统的临时性和机会主义保护方法。为了克服这些障碍,我们提出了一个基于恢复力的河流保护框架,其中包括(1) 使用指标框架评估河流的复原力;(2) 将河流视为动态耦合的社会生态系统;(3) 明确将陆地-水生网络的连通性纳入保护决策;(4) 使用新颖的复原力-保护矩阵作为工具进行战略系统规划。该框架有可能改变全球的保护实践,从而更有效地保护河流系统,增强其抵御气候变化和人类发展的能力:水与生命> 水的保护、管理和认识> 水与环境变化 人类用水> 水治理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anishinaabek responsibilities and relationships are demonstrated in N'bi (Water) Declarations Food for fish: Challenges and opportunities for quantifying foodscapes in river networks Immunity through technification? A critical review of water governance discourses in Tunisia Optimization methods in water system operation Water on the mind: Mapping behavioral and psychological research on water security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1