Patients’ perspectives on oral decitabine/cedazuridine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1177/20406207241257313
Amer M. Zeidan, Kate Perepezko, Tehseen Salimi, Terri Washington, Robert S. Epstein
{"title":"Patients’ perspectives on oral decitabine/cedazuridine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms","authors":"Amer M. Zeidan, Kate Perepezko, Tehseen Salimi, Terri Washington, Robert S. Epstein","doi":"10.1177/20406207241257313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are guideline-recommended treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS). However, a prior survey of patients with MDS reported challenges with intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) HMA therapies, including pain related to treatment administration and interference with daily activities; most patients also indicated a preference to switch to an oral therapy if one were available.Objectives:This study evaluated the perspectives of US patients with MDS receiving oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C), an alternative to IV/SC HMAs.Methods:An online survey was conducted among adult patients with MDS in the United States (10 November 2022 to 5 December 2022) who had filled a prescription for oral DEC-C between 2021 and 2022.Results:A total of 150 patients completed the survey; 61% were aged ⩾60 years and 63% were male. Of these, 123 (82%) were still receiving oral DEC-C, and 27 (18%) had stopped oral DEC-C treatment. Half (50%) of patients had received oral DEC-C for ⩾6 months. The majority reported that treatment was convenient (83%) and that they were satisfied with treatment (86%). Most patients also reported very little/no interference with regular daily activities (82%), social activities (78%), and productivity (78%). When queried about negative impacts on quality of life (QOL), treatment side effects were the most commonly reported (30% of respondents). Among patients who had previously received IV/SC HMAs ( n = 91), most agreed that oral DEC-C interfered less with daily life (91%) and had experienced improvement in QOL (85%) compared with previous treatment; 91% reported that oral DEC-C reduced the number of times they needed to travel to a healthcare facility.Conclusion:Survey results suggest very little/no impact on regular daily activities and improved QOL with oral DEC-C relative to IV/SC HMAs, highlighting the potential for oral DEC-C to reduce the treatment burden associated with parenteral HMA therapy.","PeriodicalId":23048,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20406207241257313","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are guideline-recommended treatment for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS). However, a prior survey of patients with MDS reported challenges with intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) HMA therapies, including pain related to treatment administration and interference with daily activities; most patients also indicated a preference to switch to an oral therapy if one were available.Objectives:This study evaluated the perspectives of US patients with MDS receiving oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C), an alternative to IV/SC HMAs.Methods:An online survey was conducted among adult patients with MDS in the United States (10 November 2022 to 5 December 2022) who had filled a prescription for oral DEC-C between 2021 and 2022.Results:A total of 150 patients completed the survey; 61% were aged ⩾60 years and 63% were male. Of these, 123 (82%) were still receiving oral DEC-C, and 27 (18%) had stopped oral DEC-C treatment. Half (50%) of patients had received oral DEC-C for ⩾6 months. The majority reported that treatment was convenient (83%) and that they were satisfied with treatment (86%). Most patients also reported very little/no interference with regular daily activities (82%), social activities (78%), and productivity (78%). When queried about negative impacts on quality of life (QOL), treatment side effects were the most commonly reported (30% of respondents). Among patients who had previously received IV/SC HMAs ( n = 91), most agreed that oral DEC-C interfered less with daily life (91%) and had experienced improvement in QOL (85%) compared with previous treatment; 91% reported that oral DEC-C reduced the number of times they needed to travel to a healthcare facility.Conclusion:Survey results suggest very little/no impact on regular daily activities and improved QOL with oral DEC-C relative to IV/SC HMAs, highlighting the potential for oral DEC-C to reduce the treatment burden associated with parenteral HMA therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对口服地西他滨/塞达脲苷治疗骨髓增生异常综合征/肿瘤的看法
背景:低甲基化药物(HMA)是指南推荐的治疗高风险骨髓增生异常综合征/肿瘤(MDS)的药物。然而,此前一项针对MDS患者的调查报告显示,静脉注射(IV)和皮下注射(SC)HMA疗法存在诸多挑战,包括与用药相关的疼痛和对日常活动的干扰;大多数患者还表示,如果有口服疗法,他们更愿意改用口服疗法。目的:本研究评估了接受口服地西他滨/西达嘧啶(DEC-C)治疗的美国 MDS 患者的观点,DEC-C 是静脉注射/皮下注射 HMA 的替代疗法。方法:本研究对 2021 年至 2022 年期间开过口服 DEC-C 处方的美国成年 MDS 患者进行了在线调查(2022 年 11 月 10 日至 2022 年 12 月 5 日)。其中 123 人(82%)仍在接受口服 DEC-C,27 人(18%)已停止口服 DEC-C 治疗。半数患者(50%)口服 DEC-C 的时间已达 6 个月。大多数患者表示治疗方便(83%),对治疗感到满意(86%)。大多数患者还表示对日常活动(82%)、社交活动(78%)和工作效率(78%)的干扰很小/没有。当问及对生活质量(QOL)的负面影响时,最常见的是治疗副作用(30% 的受访者)。结论:调查结果表明,与静脉注射/静脉注射HMA相比,口服DEC-C对常规日常活动的影响很小/没有影响,并且改善了患者的生活质量,突出了口服DEC-C减轻肠外HMA治疗负担的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Hematology delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of hematology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in hematology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
期刊最新文献
A nomogram based on InLDH and InNLR for predicting disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with heat stroke. Prognostic significance of MRD and its correlation with arsenic concentration in pediatric acute promyelocytic leukemia: a retrospective study by SCCLG-APL group. Single-center experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in young patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Hematopoietic stem cell microtransplantation: current situation and challenges. Current landscape of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the era of complement inhibitors and regulators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1