Bernat de las Heras, Lynden Rodrigues, Jacopo Cristini, Kevin Moncion, Numa Dancause, Alexander Thiel, Jodi Edwards, Janice J Eng, Ada Tang, Marc Roig
{"title":"Lesion location changes the association between brain excitability and motor skill acquisition post-stroke","authors":"Bernat de las Heras, Lynden Rodrigues, Jacopo Cristini, Kevin Moncion, Numa Dancause, Alexander Thiel, Jodi Edwards, Janice J Eng, Ada Tang, Marc Roig","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.30.24311146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The capacity to reacquire motor skills lost after a stroke is crucial to promote upper-limb motor recovery but the impact of lesion location on motor skill acquisition and the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain uncertain. Methods: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate associations between excitatory and inhibitory cortico-spinal excitability measures and the capacity to acquire a novel motor skill with the most affected hand in 103 individuals with cortical (n=34) or subcortical (n=69) lesions. Results: Both groups showed similar motor skill acquisition, but subcortical lesions exhibited more impairment in the most affected hand and lower excitability in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In cortical lesions, motor skill acquisition was associated with lower motor thresholds (?=-0.25, 95% CI [-0.47,-0.03]; p=0.024) and higher intracortical inhibition (?=-3.93, 95% CI [-6.89,-0.98]; p=0.011) in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In contrast, in subcortical lesions motor skill acquisition was associated with smaller motor evoked potentials (?=-4.46, 95% CI [-8.54,-0.38]; p=0.033), less intracortical inhibition (?=3.45, 95% CI [0.34,6.56]; p=0.030) and higher facilitation (?=1.34,95% CI [0.15,2.54]; p= 0.028) ipsilesionally. Sensitivity analyses revealed that associations with intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the subcortical group were driven by lesions affecting the corticospinal tract. No associations were found in the contralesional hemisphere. Conclusions: Reinforcing the existence of lesion-specific neurophysiological patterns, individuals with cortical and subcortical lesions show divergent associations between cortico-spinal excitability and motor skill acquisition. The use of cortico-spinal excitability as a biomarker to predict upper-limb recovery post-stroke or guide motor recovery interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation should consider lesion location.","PeriodicalId":501453,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24311146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The capacity to reacquire motor skills lost after a stroke is crucial to promote upper-limb motor recovery but the impact of lesion location on motor skill acquisition and the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain uncertain. Methods: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate associations between excitatory and inhibitory cortico-spinal excitability measures and the capacity to acquire a novel motor skill with the most affected hand in 103 individuals with cortical (n=34) or subcortical (n=69) lesions. Results: Both groups showed similar motor skill acquisition, but subcortical lesions exhibited more impairment in the most affected hand and lower excitability in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In cortical lesions, motor skill acquisition was associated with lower motor thresholds (?=-0.25, 95% CI [-0.47,-0.03]; p=0.024) and higher intracortical inhibition (?=-3.93, 95% CI [-6.89,-0.98]; p=0.011) in the ipsilesional hemisphere. In contrast, in subcortical lesions motor skill acquisition was associated with smaller motor evoked potentials (?=-4.46, 95% CI [-8.54,-0.38]; p=0.033), less intracortical inhibition (?=3.45, 95% CI [0.34,6.56]; p=0.030) and higher facilitation (?=1.34,95% CI [0.15,2.54]; p= 0.028) ipsilesionally. Sensitivity analyses revealed that associations with intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the subcortical group were driven by lesions affecting the corticospinal tract. No associations were found in the contralesional hemisphere. Conclusions: Reinforcing the existence of lesion-specific neurophysiological patterns, individuals with cortical and subcortical lesions show divergent associations between cortico-spinal excitability and motor skill acquisition. The use of cortico-spinal excitability as a biomarker to predict upper-limb recovery post-stroke or guide motor recovery interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation should consider lesion location.
背景:中风后重新获得丧失的运动技能对促进上肢运动恢复至关重要,但病变位置对运动技能获得的影响以及潜在的神经生理机制仍不确定。研究方法我们使用经颅磁刺激研究了皮质(34 例)或皮质下(69 例)病变的 103 例患者的兴奋性和抑制性皮质脊髓兴奋性测量值与用受影响最大的手获得新运动技能的能力之间的关系。结果显示两组患者的运动技能掌握能力相似,但皮层下病变患者受影响最严重的那只手的功能受损更严重,同侧半球的兴奋性更低。在皮层病变中,运动技能的掌握与同侧半球较低的运动阈值(?=-0.25,95% CI [-0.47,-0.03];P=0.024)和较高的皮层内抑制(?=-3.93,95% CI [-6.89,-0.98];P=0.011)有关。相反,在皮层下病变中,运动技能获得与同侧较小的运动诱发电位(?=-4.46,95% CI [-8.54,-0.38];p=0.033)、较少的皮层内抑制(?=3.45,95% CI [0.34,6.56];p=0.030)和较高的促进(?=1.34,95% CI [0.15,2.54];p= 0.028)相关。敏感性分析表明,皮层下组中皮层内抑制和促进的相关性是由影响皮层脊髓束的病变引起的。对侧半球未发现相关性。结论皮质和皮质下病变的个体在皮质脊髓兴奋性和运动技能习得之间表现出不同的关联,这强化了病变特异性神经生理学模式的存在。使用皮质脊髓兴奋性作为生物标志物来预测中风后上肢的恢复或指导运动恢复干预(如无创脑刺激),应考虑病变位置。