{"title":"Probabilistic dynamic resilience quantification for infrastructure systems in multi-hazard environments","authors":"Ahmed Badr , Zoe Li , Wael El-Dakhakhni","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resilience has been evolving as a key criterion for infrastructure systems as it ensures the system's dynamic performance pre-, during, and post-hazard disruptions. However, estimating these performances is challenging due to system and operation complexities, and the probabilistic dynamic nature of infrastructure system. Moreover, infrastructure systems are usually exposed to multi-hazard environments, with their own probabilistic behavior, leading to additional complexity in terms of estimating the system response and, subsequently, the overall system resilience. As such, this study develops a probabilistic resilience-centric system dynamics modeling approach to quantify infrastructure dynamic resilience based on a holistic representation of infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios, whereby the probabilistic natures of both the hazards and system are incorporated. Unlike the traditional resilience quantification approaches that represent system resilience by a single value calculated after the system's full recovery, the developed model focuses on tracking the temporal evolution of system resilience along the entire period of system performance deterioration and recovery. A real-world hydropower dam, as an example for infrastructure systems, in British Columbia, Canada is used as a demonstration application to show model utility in developing resilience-guided assessment plans for infrastructure systems. Overall, the developed approach empowers the decision-makers with insights into critical operational periods, the required time to reach specified resilience targets, and the efficiency of risk mitigation measures in <em>real-time</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000398/pdfft?md5=cf0b554879a85aad377f598558d3e1ea&pid=1-s2.0-S1874548224000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Resilience has been evolving as a key criterion for infrastructure systems as it ensures the system's dynamic performance pre-, during, and post-hazard disruptions. However, estimating these performances is challenging due to system and operation complexities, and the probabilistic dynamic nature of infrastructure system. Moreover, infrastructure systems are usually exposed to multi-hazard environments, with their own probabilistic behavior, leading to additional complexity in terms of estimating the system response and, subsequently, the overall system resilience. As such, this study develops a probabilistic resilience-centric system dynamics modeling approach to quantify infrastructure dynamic resilience based on a holistic representation of infrastructure systems under multi-hazard scenarios, whereby the probabilistic natures of both the hazards and system are incorporated. Unlike the traditional resilience quantification approaches that represent system resilience by a single value calculated after the system's full recovery, the developed model focuses on tracking the temporal evolution of system resilience along the entire period of system performance deterioration and recovery. A real-world hydropower dam, as an example for infrastructure systems, in British Columbia, Canada is used as a demonstration application to show model utility in developing resilience-guided assessment plans for infrastructure systems. Overall, the developed approach empowers the decision-makers with insights into critical operational periods, the required time to reach specified resilience targets, and the efficiency of risk mitigation measures in real-time.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing.
The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:
1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors.
2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection.
3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures.
4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.