Novel Methodology to Measure the Reliability of Public DC Fast Charging Stations

Tisura D. Gamage, Alan T. Jenn, Gil Tal
{"title":"Novel Methodology to Measure the Reliability of Public DC Fast Charging Stations","authors":"Tisura D. Gamage, Alan T. Jenn, Gil Tal","doi":"10.1177/03611981241244798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A network of reliable corridor charging stations is essential to building driver confidence in long-distance battery electric vehicle trips. Here, we propose a detailed methodology to measure station reliability based on charging infrastructure data. By assigning charging events to unique charging visits, our methodology can capture a holistic overview of the driver’s charging experience. We use real world charging data collected between 2019 and 2022 from 54 Direct Current Fast Chargers (DCFCs) in 36 corridor charging stations across California to demonstrate that our overarching reliability framework is close to the experience of users. Our analysis of two different charging networks shows that users of these networks have an average chance of 83% and 77% generally successful outcomes, respectively, after one or more tries at a charging station location. We also find significant variation in station performance within the same network (i.e., 79%–87% and 13%–95%, respectively). Furthermore, we observe that at least 3% of users are facing unexpected charging interruptions. In addition, we demonstrate a practical application of our framework for deep diagnostics of the charging eco-system using error codes to identify common issues such as vehicle/charger communication issues, safety issues, payment issues, and cable/connector issues. We compare how error codes alone are not a good proxy to diagnose charging failures. As more data from DCFCs becomes available, our methodology can become a mainstream tool for evaluating station reliability.","PeriodicalId":517391,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241244798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A network of reliable corridor charging stations is essential to building driver confidence in long-distance battery electric vehicle trips. Here, we propose a detailed methodology to measure station reliability based on charging infrastructure data. By assigning charging events to unique charging visits, our methodology can capture a holistic overview of the driver’s charging experience. We use real world charging data collected between 2019 and 2022 from 54 Direct Current Fast Chargers (DCFCs) in 36 corridor charging stations across California to demonstrate that our overarching reliability framework is close to the experience of users. Our analysis of two different charging networks shows that users of these networks have an average chance of 83% and 77% generally successful outcomes, respectively, after one or more tries at a charging station location. We also find significant variation in station performance within the same network (i.e., 79%–87% and 13%–95%, respectively). Furthermore, we observe that at least 3% of users are facing unexpected charging interruptions. In addition, we demonstrate a practical application of our framework for deep diagnostics of the charging eco-system using error codes to identify common issues such as vehicle/charger communication issues, safety issues, payment issues, and cable/connector issues. We compare how error codes alone are not a good proxy to diagnose charging failures. As more data from DCFCs becomes available, our methodology can become a mainstream tool for evaluating station reliability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量公共直流快速充电站可靠性的新方法
可靠的走廊充电站网络对于建立驾驶员对长途电池电动汽车出行的信心至关重要。在此,我们提出了一种基于充电基础设施数据来衡量充电站可靠性的详细方法。通过将充电事件分配给独特的充电访问,我们的方法可以全面了解驾驶员的充电体验。我们使用了 2019 年至 2022 年期间从加利福尼亚州 36 个走廊充电站的 54 个直流快速充电器(DCFC)收集到的真实充电数据,以证明我们的总体可靠性框架接近用户体验。我们对两个不同充电网络的分析表明,这些网络的用户在充电站位置尝试一次或多次后,一般成功的平均几率分别为 83% 和 77%。我们还发现,在同一网络中,充电站的表现也有很大差异(即分别为 79%-87% 和 13%-95%)。此外,我们还发现至少有 3% 的用户面临意外的充电中断。此外,我们还展示了我们的框架在充电生态系统深度诊断中的实际应用,利用错误代码识别常见问题,如车辆/充电器通信问题、安全问题、支付问题和电缆/连接器问题。我们比较了错误代码本身并不能很好地诊断充电故障。随着直流FC 数据的增多,我们的方法将成为评估充电站可靠性的主流工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ordinal Clustering Based Homogeneous Road Segments in Asphalt Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Optimized Decision-Making Exploring the Relationship Between COVID-19 Transmission and Population Mobility over Time CTAFFNet: CNN–Transformer Adaptive Feature Fusion Object Detection Algorithm for Complex Traffic Scenarios Eye Movement Evaluation of Pedestrians' Mobile Phone Usage at Street Crossings Impact of Texting-Induced Distraction on Driving Behavior Based on Field Operation Tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1