Mycorrhizal status and type dominate global fine root C:N:P stoichiometry

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Plant Ecology Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s11258-024-01450-5
Shuang Yang, Zhaoyong Shi, Xiaohui Wang, Fayuan Wang
{"title":"Mycorrhizal status and type dominate global fine root C:N:P stoichiometry","authors":"Shuang Yang, Zhaoyong Shi, Xiaohui Wang, Fayuan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11258-024-01450-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fine root stoichiometry characterizes nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Mycorrhizae are major regulators of plant carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrients. However, our understanding of the fine root stoichiometry at the global scale and their driving role by mycorrhizae is extremely limited. This study used global data to explore the stoichiometry of fine root C, N, P and their relationships with climatic factors across different mycorrhizal statuses and types. The results showed that obligately mycorrhizal (OM) species (always form mycorrhizae) had significantly higher fine root N contents (12.66 mg/g), while non-mycorrhizal (NM) species had significantly higher fine root P contents (1.50 mg/g). Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plants had significantly lower fine root C contents (443.11 mg/g) and higher fine root N contents (13.55 mg/g). AM + ECM plants had significantly higher fine root C/N, root C/P, and root N/P. Mycorrhiza had a positive effect on fine roots N, with AM having the most pronounced positive effect. The correlation between the elements of fine roots was more pronounced among OM and AM plants. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature (MAT) had positive effects on C in OM plants, with the most pronounced positive effects on C in ECM plants. MAP and MAT had negative effects on C in FM plants. MAT had a positive effect on N in NM plants, but a negative effect on P in OM plants. Our study revealed biogeographic patterns of global fine root C:N:P stoichiometry and advanced our understanding of fine root biogeochemical cycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":20233,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01450-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fine root stoichiometry characterizes nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. Mycorrhizae are major regulators of plant carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) nutrients. However, our understanding of the fine root stoichiometry at the global scale and their driving role by mycorrhizae is extremely limited. This study used global data to explore the stoichiometry of fine root C, N, P and their relationships with climatic factors across different mycorrhizal statuses and types. The results showed that obligately mycorrhizal (OM) species (always form mycorrhizae) had significantly higher fine root N contents (12.66 mg/g), while non-mycorrhizal (NM) species had significantly higher fine root P contents (1.50 mg/g). Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) plants had significantly lower fine root C contents (443.11 mg/g) and higher fine root N contents (13.55 mg/g). AM + ECM plants had significantly higher fine root C/N, root C/P, and root N/P. Mycorrhiza had a positive effect on fine roots N, with AM having the most pronounced positive effect. The correlation between the elements of fine roots was more pronounced among OM and AM plants. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature (MAT) had positive effects on C in OM plants, with the most pronounced positive effects on C in ECM plants. MAP and MAT had negative effects on C in FM plants. MAT had a positive effect on N in NM plants, but a negative effect on P in OM plants. Our study revealed biogeographic patterns of global fine root C:N:P stoichiometry and advanced our understanding of fine root biogeochemical cycling.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菌根状态和类型主导全球细根 C:N:P 的化学计量
细根生物量是陆地生态系统养分循环的特征。菌根是植物碳(C)、氮(N)和磷(P)养分的主要调节因子。然而,我们对全球范围内细根化学计量及其对菌根的驱动作用的了解极为有限。本研究利用全球数据探讨了不同菌根状态和类型下细根C、N、P的化学计量及其与气候因素的关系。结果表明,强制性菌根(OM)物种(始终形成菌根)的细根 N 含量(12.66 毫克/克)明显较高,而非菌根(NM)物种的细根 P 含量(1.50 毫克/克)明显较高。丛枝菌根(AM)植物的细根 C 含量(443.11 毫克/克)明显较低,而细根 N 含量(13.55 毫克/克)较高。AM + ECM 植物的细根 C/N、根 C/P 和根 N/P 明显更高。菌根对细根 N 有积极影响,其中 AM 的积极影响最为明显。在 OM 和 AM 植物中,细根元素之间的相关性更为明显。年平均降水量(MAP)和年平均气温(MAT)对 OM 植物的 C 有正向影响,对 ECM 植物的 C 的正向影响最为明显。年平均降水量(MAP)和年平均气温(MAT)对调频(FM)植物的 C 有负面影响。MAT 对 NM 植物的氮有积极影响,但对 OM 植物的磷有消极影响。我们的研究揭示了全球细根C:N:P化学计量的生物地理学模式,加深了我们对细根生物地球化学循环的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Ecology
Plant Ecology 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology publishes original scientific papers that report and interpret the findings of pure and applied research into the ecology of vascular plants in terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. Empirical, experimental, theoretical and review papers reporting on ecophysiology, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, molecular and historical ecology are within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Ski slopes as an unrecognized source of human impact on vegetation Effects of host size and substrate types on the distribution of accidental and obligate epiphytes: a case study in a temperate forest of Japan Effect of competition, with exotic invasive Bromus inermis and native Quercus stellata, and soil amendment on the performance of native invasive Juniperus virginiana Modelling landscape-scale occurrences of common grassland species in a topographically complex mountainous environment Prediction of historical, current and future potential distribution of Rhus chinensis (Anacardiaceae) based on the optimized MaxEnt model in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1