Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America

Carolina Pradier, Diego Kozlowski, Natsumi S. Shokida, Vincent Larivière
{"title":"Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America","authors":"Carolina Pradier, Diego Kozlowski, Natsumi S. Shokida, Vincent Larivière","doi":"arxiv-2407.18783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Latin-American scientific community has achieved significant progress\ntowards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men\nscientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be underrepresented in scholarly\ncommunication. Throughout the 20th century, Latin America established its\nacademic circuit, focusing on research topics of regional significance.\nHowever, the community has since reoriented its research towards the global\nacademic circuit. Through an analysis of scientific publications, this article\nexplores the relationship between gender inequalities in science and the\nintegration of Latin-American researchers into the regional and global academic\ncircuits between 1993 and 2022. We find that women are more likely to engage in\nthe regional circuit, while men are more active within the global circuit. This\ntrend is attributed to a thematic alignment between women's research interests\nand issues specific to Latin America. Furthermore, our results reveal that the\nmechanisms contributing to gender differences in symbolic capital accumulation\nvary between circuits. Women's work achieves equal or greater recognition\ncompared to men's within the regional circuit, but generally garners less\nattention in the global circuit. Our findings suggest that policies aimed at\nstrengthening the regional academic circuit would encourage scientists to\naddress locally relevant topics while simultaneously fostering gender equality\nin science.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"212 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.18783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Latin-American scientific community has achieved significant progress towards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men scientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be underrepresented in scholarly communication. Throughout the 20th century, Latin America established its academic circuit, focusing on research topics of regional significance. However, the community has since reoriented its research towards the global academic circuit. Through an analysis of scientific publications, this article explores the relationship between gender inequalities in science and the integration of Latin-American researchers into the regional and global academic circuits between 1993 and 2022. We find that women are more likely to engage in the regional circuit, while men are more active within the global circuit. This trend is attributed to a thematic alignment between women's research interests and issues specific to Latin America. Furthermore, our results reveal that the mechanisms contributing to gender differences in symbolic capital accumulation vary between circuits. Women's work achieves equal or greater recognition compared to men's within the regional circuit, but generally garners less attention in the global circuit. Our findings suggest that policies aimed at strengthening the regional academic circuit would encourage scientists to address locally relevant topics while simultaneously fostering gender equality in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学为谁服务?地区学术圈对拉丁美洲性别不平等的影响
拉丁美洲科学界在实现性别均等方面取得了重大进展,女科学家和男科学家的比例几 乎相等。然而,妇女在学术交流中的代表性仍然不足。在整个 20 世纪,拉丁美洲建立了自己的学术圈,重点关注具有地区意义的研究课题。本文通过对科学出版物的分析,探讨了 1993 年至 2022 年间科学领域的性别不平等与拉美研究人员融入地区和全球学术圈之间的关系。我们发现,女性更有可能加入地区学术圈,而男性在全球学术圈中更为活跃。这一趋势归因于女性的研究兴趣与拉丁美洲特有问题之间的主题一致性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,导致象征性资本积累中性别差异的主题机制在不同线路之间存在差异。与男性相比,女性的工作在地区范围内获得了同等或更高的认可,但在全球范围内一般较少受到关注。我们的研究结果表明,旨在加强地区学术循环的政策将鼓励科学家解决与当地相关的问题,同时促进科学领域的性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1