eSPARQL: Representing and Reconciling Agnostic and Atheistic Beliefs in RDF-star Knowledge Graphs

Xiny Pan, Daniel Hernández, Philipp Seifer, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab
{"title":"eSPARQL: Representing and Reconciling Agnostic and Atheistic Beliefs in RDF-star Knowledge Graphs","authors":"Xiny Pan, Daniel Hernández, Philipp Seifer, Ralf Lämmel, Steffen Staab","doi":"arxiv-2407.21483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few years, we have seen the emergence of large knowledge graphs\ncombining information from multiple sources. Sometimes, this information is\nprovided in the form of assertions about other assertions, defining contexts\nwhere assertions are valid. A recent extension to RDF which admits statements\nover statements, called RDF-star, is in revision to become a W3C standard.\nHowever, there is no proposal for a semantics of these RDF-star statements nor\na built-in facility to operate over them. In this paper, we propose a query\nlanguage for epistemic RDF-star metadata based on a four-valued logic, called\neSPARQL. Our proposed query language extends SPARQL-star, the query language\nfor RDF-star, with a new type of FROM clause to facilitate operating with\nmultiple and sometimes conflicting beliefs. We show that the proposed query\nlanguage can express four use case queries, including the following features:\n(i) querying the belief of an individual, (ii) the aggregating of beliefs,\n(iii) querying who is conflicting with somebody, and (iv) beliefs about beliefs\n(i.e., nesting of beliefs).","PeriodicalId":501123,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Databases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Databases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.21483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past few years, we have seen the emergence of large knowledge graphs combining information from multiple sources. Sometimes, this information is provided in the form of assertions about other assertions, defining contexts where assertions are valid. A recent extension to RDF which admits statements over statements, called RDF-star, is in revision to become a W3C standard. However, there is no proposal for a semantics of these RDF-star statements nor a built-in facility to operate over them. In this paper, we propose a query language for epistemic RDF-star metadata based on a four-valued logic, called eSPARQL. Our proposed query language extends SPARQL-star, the query language for RDF-star, with a new type of FROM clause to facilitate operating with multiple and sometimes conflicting beliefs. We show that the proposed query language can express four use case queries, including the following features: (i) querying the belief of an individual, (ii) the aggregating of beliefs, (iii) querying who is conflicting with somebody, and (iv) beliefs about beliefs (i.e., nesting of beliefs).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eSPARQL:在 RDF-star 知识图谱中表示和调和不可知论与无神论信仰
在过去几年中,我们看到了将多种来源的信息整合在一起的大型知识图谱的出现。有时,这些信息是以关于其他断言的断言的形式提供的,定义了断言有效的上下文。然而,目前还没有关于这些 RDF-star 语句语义的建议,也没有对其进行操作的内置工具。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于四值逻辑的RDF-star元数据查询语言,称为eSPARQL。我们提出的查询语言扩展了RDF-star的查询语言SPARQL-star,增加了一种新型FROM子句,以方便操作多个有时相互冲突的信念。我们展示了所提出的查询语言可以表达四种用例查询,包括以下功能:(i) 查询个人的信念,(ii) 聚集信念,(iii) 查询谁与某人有冲突,以及 (iv) 关于信念的信念(即信念嵌套)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Data Evaluation Benchmark for Data Wrangling Recommendation System Messy Code Makes Managing ML Pipelines Difficult? Just Let LLMs Rewrite the Code! Fast and Adaptive Bulk Loading of Multidimensional Points Matrix Profile for Anomaly Detection on Multidimensional Time Series Extending predictive process monitoring for collaborative processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1