Automated Pediatric Brain Tumor Imaging Assessment Tool from CBTN: Enhancing Suprasellar Region Inclusion and Managing Limited Data with Deep Learning

Deep B Gandhi, Nastaran Khalili, Ariana Familiar, Anurag Gottipati, Neda Khalili, Wenxin Tu, Shuvanjan Haldar, Hannah Anderson, Karthik Viswanathan, Phillip B Storm, Jeffrey B Ware, Adam C Resnick, Arastoo Vossough, Ali Nabavizadeh, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
{"title":"Automated Pediatric Brain Tumor Imaging Assessment Tool from CBTN: Enhancing Suprasellar Region Inclusion and Managing Limited Data with Deep Learning","authors":"Deep B Gandhi, Nastaran Khalili, Ariana Familiar, Anurag Gottipati, Neda Khalili, Wenxin Tu, Shuvanjan Haldar, Hannah Anderson, Karthik Viswanathan, Phillip B Storm, Jeffrey B Ware, Adam C Resnick, Arastoo Vossough, Ali Nabavizadeh, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.29.24311006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fully-automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation.\nMethods: Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n=336 for skull-stripping, n=489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired two-sample t-tests and Pearsons correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies. Results: Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98±0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearsons correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; p<0.05 for all). WT Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84±0.17 (median=0.90) for T2 and 0.82±0.19 (median=0.89) for FLAIR inputs. ET Dice scores were 0.65±0.35 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64±0.36 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs. Conclusion: Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and enhancing tumor regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.24311006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fully-automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation. Methods: Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n=336 for skull-stripping, n=489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired two-sample t-tests and Pearsons correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies. Results: Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98±0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearsons correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; p<0.05 for all). WT Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84±0.17 (median=0.90) for T2 and 0.82±0.19 (median=0.89) for FLAIR inputs. ET Dice scores were 0.65±0.35 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64±0.36 (median=0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs. Conclusion: Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and enhancing tumor regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自 CBTN 的小儿脑肿瘤自动成像评估工具:利用深度学习加强髌上区的纳入和有限数据的管理
背景:全自动头骨切片和肿瘤分割对于监测小儿脑肿瘤(PBT)至关重要。然而,目前的方法往往缺乏通用性,尤其是对于蝶鞍/鞍上区域的罕见肿瘤,以及在有限数据场景下应用于真实世界临床数据时。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了人工智能驱动的头骨剥离和肿瘤分割技术:我们处理了来自 527 名儿科患者的多机构、多参数 MRI 扫描数据(头骨切片 336 例,肿瘤分割 489 例),这些扫描数据具有不同的 PBT 组织学,用于训练单独的基于 nnU-Net 的深度学习模型,以进行头骨切片、全瘤(WT)和增强瘤(ET)分割。这些模型利用单个(T2/FLAIR)或多个(T1-Gd 和 T2/FLAIR)输入成像序列。使用 Dice 分数、灵敏度和 95% Hausdorff 距离对性能进行评估。统计比较包括配对或非配对双样本 t 检验和基于不同模型和 PBT 组织学的 Dice 分数的 Pearsons 相关系数。结果在多参数和单参数模型中,用于全脑和蝶窦/鞍上区分割的颅骨剥离模型的 Dice 分数均为 0.98±0.01(中位数为 0.98),单参数和多参数 Dice 分数之间存在显著的皮尔逊相关系数(r >0.80;p<0.05)。单输入肿瘤分割模型的 WT Dice 分数为:T2 0.84±0.17(中位数=0.90),FLAIR 输入 0.82±0.19(中位数=0.89)。T1-Gd+FLAIR 和 T1-Gd+T2 输入的 ET Dice 分数分别为 0.65±0.35(中位数=0.79)和 0.64±0.36(中位数=0.79)。结论我们的颅骨剥离模型性能卓越,使用单参数或多参数输入,可包括蝶鞍/鞍上区域。此外,我们的自动肿瘤分割模型能可靠地划分出整个病灶和增强肿瘤区域,并能在数据有限的情况下适应序列缺失的核磁共振成像会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Observer Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of CT-LEFAT Criteria for Post-Treatment Head and Neck Lymphedema: A Prospective Blinded Comparative Analysis of Oncologist Human Inter-Rater Performance Whole Genome Sequencing and single-cell transcriptomics identify KMT2D as a potential new driver for pituitary adenomas Self Reported Financial Difficulties Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Chronis Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated at U.S. Community Oncology Clinics (Alliance A231602CD) First-in-human evaluation of memory-like NK cells with an IL-15 super-agonist and CTLA-4 blockade in advanced head and neck cancer Viral transcript and tumor immune microenvironment-based transcriptomic profiling of HPV-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies subtypes associated with prognosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1