Current practice of ultrasound in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of a national survey

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0231
Ilenia Mappa, Bianca Masturzo, Tullio Ghi, Giuseppe Rizzo
{"title":"Current practice of ultrasound in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of a national survey","authors":"Ilenia Mappa, Bianca Masturzo, Tullio Ghi, Giuseppe Rizzo","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Although frequently employed in the delivery room, current guidelines do not recommend the use of ultrasound in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the routine use of ultrasonography during PPH. Methods A questionnaire, composed by a series of questions that assess participant characteristics and ultrasound use during PPH, was sent to members of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology currently employed in obstetrical units. Answers were subsequently grouped based on participant characteristics. Results Based on the responses of 200 participants it was found that ultrasound was routinely employed by 67 % of participants during PPH, by 85 % if Retained Products of Conception (RPOC) was suspected, by 67 % during Bakri balloon placement and by 69 % during curettage procedures. Routine ultrasound use was higher amongst participants working in hospitals with a higher number of deliveries, by those with more years of experience using ultrasound in labor, and by those that had attended specific postgraduate training courses. Conclusions Despite the lack of recommendations in the current guidelines, the results of this survey show that ultrasound seems to be commonly employed by maternal fetal medicine practitioners in the management of PPH.","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Although frequently employed in the delivery room, current guidelines do not recommend the use of ultrasound in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the routine use of ultrasonography during PPH. Methods A questionnaire, composed by a series of questions that assess participant characteristics and ultrasound use during PPH, was sent to members of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology currently employed in obstetrical units. Answers were subsequently grouped based on participant characteristics. Results Based on the responses of 200 participants it was found that ultrasound was routinely employed by 67 % of participants during PPH, by 85 % if Retained Products of Conception (RPOC) was suspected, by 67 % during Bakri balloon placement and by 69 % during curettage procedures. Routine ultrasound use was higher amongst participants working in hospitals with a higher number of deliveries, by those with more years of experience using ultrasound in labor, and by those that had attended specific postgraduate training courses. Conclusions Despite the lack of recommendations in the current guidelines, the results of this survey show that ultrasound seems to be commonly employed by maternal fetal medicine practitioners in the management of PPH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波治疗产后出血的当前做法:对一项全国调查的二次分析
目的 虽然在产房中经常使用超声波,但目前的指南并不建议在产后出血(PPH)的情况下使用超声波。本调查旨在评估 PPH 期间常规使用超声波检查的情况。方法 向目前在产科工作的意大利妇产科超声学会成员发送了一份调查问卷,其中包括一系列评估参与者特征和 PPH 期间超声使用情况的问题。随后根据参与者的特征对答案进行了分组。结果 根据 200 名参与者的回答,67% 的参与者在 PPH 时常规使用超声波,85% 的参与者在怀疑有受孕残留物 (RPOC) 时常规使用超声波,67% 的参与者在放置巴克里球囊时常规使用超声波,69% 的参与者在刮宫术中常规使用超声波。在分娩次数较多的医院工作的参与者、拥有较多年分娩超声波使用经验的参与者以及参加过特定研究生培训课程的参与者中,常规超声波使用率较高。结论 尽管目前的指南中缺乏相关建议,但本次调查结果显示,母体胎儿医学从业人员在处理 PPH 时似乎普遍使用了超声波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1