An improved three-dimensional extension of Hoek–Brown criterion for rocks

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40948-024-00841-2
Junjie Xiao, Jiacun Liu, Ying Xu, Xing Li, Ang Liu, Kaiwen Xia
{"title":"An improved three-dimensional extension of Hoek–Brown criterion for rocks","authors":"Junjie Xiao, Jiacun Liu, Ying Xu, Xing Li, Ang Liu, Kaiwen Xia","doi":"10.1007/s40948-024-00841-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Hoek–Brown (H–B) criterion has found widespread application in numerous rock engineering projects. However, its efficacy is compromised by an underestimation of rock strength due to its neglect of the influence of the intermediate principal stress (<span>\\(\\sigma_{2}\\)</span>). Experimental evidence underscores the significant impact of <span>\\(\\sigma_{2}\\)</span>. Consequently, there exists an imperative to formulate a three-dimensional (3D) criterion. In this study, a new deviatoric function with two additional parameters (<span>\\(k\\)</span> and <span>\\(A\\)</span>) is developed firstly, which ensure compliance with the prerequisites of smoothness and convexity. In addition, the parameters <span>\\(k\\)</span> and <span>\\(A\\)</span> are bonded with the weakening effect of the Lode angle (<span>\\(\\theta_{\\sigma }\\)</span>) and the strengthening effect of the mean stress (<span>\\(\\sigma_{m}\\)</span>), respectively. Then a new 3D strength criterion for rocks is proposed by combining this new deviatoric function and the triaxial compression meridian function of the original H–B criterion. Four distinct sets of test data encompassing various rock types are employed to validate the proposed criterion. The results demonstrate that the proposed criterion adeptly captures the strength characteristics of the four rock types, providing a good depiction of failure surfaces within the 3D principal stress space. Comparative analyses involve the utilization of several existing 3D H–B criteria for strength predictions. The proposed criterion exhibits superior fitting performance for all the selected rocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12813,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00841-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Hoek–Brown (H–B) criterion has found widespread application in numerous rock engineering projects. However, its efficacy is compromised by an underestimation of rock strength due to its neglect of the influence of the intermediate principal stress (\(\sigma_{2}\)). Experimental evidence underscores the significant impact of \(\sigma_{2}\). Consequently, there exists an imperative to formulate a three-dimensional (3D) criterion. In this study, a new deviatoric function with two additional parameters (\(k\) and \(A\)) is developed firstly, which ensure compliance with the prerequisites of smoothness and convexity. In addition, the parameters \(k\) and \(A\) are bonded with the weakening effect of the Lode angle (\(\theta_{\sigma }\)) and the strengthening effect of the mean stress (\(\sigma_{m}\)), respectively. Then a new 3D strength criterion for rocks is proposed by combining this new deviatoric function and the triaxial compression meridian function of the original H–B criterion. Four distinct sets of test data encompassing various rock types are employed to validate the proposed criterion. The results demonstrate that the proposed criterion adeptly captures the strength characteristics of the four rock types, providing a good depiction of failure surfaces within the 3D principal stress space. Comparative analyses involve the utilization of several existing 3D H–B criteria for strength predictions. The proposed criterion exhibits superior fitting performance for all the selected rocks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进的岩石霍克-布朗准则的三维扩展
霍克-布朗(Hoek-Brown,H-B)准则已被广泛应用于众多岩石工程项目中。然而,由于忽略了中间主应力(\(\sigma_{2}\))的影响,低估了岩石强度,从而影响了其有效性。实验证据强调了(\(sigma_{2}\))的重要影响。因此,制定一个三维(3D)标准势在必行。在这项研究中,首先开发了一种新的偏离函数,它带有两个附加参数((k)和(A)),确保符合平滑性和凸性的前提条件。此外,参数\(k\)和\(A\)分别与洛德角的削弱效应(\(\theta_{\sigma }\)和平均应力的增强效应(\(\sigma_{m}\)结合在一起。然后,通过将这种新的偏差函数与原始 H-B 准则的三轴压缩子午线函数相结合,提出了一种新的岩石三维强度准则。四组不同类型岩石的测试数据被用来验证所提出的准则。结果表明,所提出的准则能够很好地捕捉四种岩石类型的强度特征,在三维主应力空间内很好地描述了破坏面。比较分析涉及利用现有的几种三维 H-B 标准进行强度预测。对于所有选定的岩石,所提出的标准都表现出卓越的拟合性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: This journal offers original research, new developments, and case studies in geomechanics and geophysics, focused on energy and resources in Earth’s subsurface. Covers theory, experimental results, numerical methods, modeling, engineering, technology and more.
期刊最新文献
Numerical analysis of the influence of quartz crystal anisotropy on the thermal–mechanical coupling behavior of monomineral quartzite Failure analysis of Nehbandan granite under various stress states and strain rates using a calibrated Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma constitutive model Fracture propagation characteristics of layered shale oil reservoirs with dense laminas under cyclic pressure shock fracturing Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation from recompletion in refracturing with dynamic stress modeling Criterion for hydraulic fracture propagation behaviour at coal measure composite reservoir interface based on energy release rate theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1