How power in corporate-industrial meat supply chains enables negative externalities: Three case studies from Brazil, the US, and Australia

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES One Earth Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.004
{"title":"How power in corporate-industrial meat supply chains enables negative externalities: Three case studies from Brazil, the US, and Australia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global corporate-industrial meat production is associated with harms to social, animal, and planetary health. Although national policy discussions are lacking, some studies suggest addressing these harms through taxation and supply chain standards. However, these proposals overlook the potential role of corporate power in creating and perpetuating these harms. Our study addresses this gap by examining how political, economic, and structural features of food systems enable the meat industry to externalize costs of production and perpetuate ecological and social harms. Here, we analyze three case studies from different stages of global supply chains, revealing a highly concentrated meat industry, close industry-government ties, reduced regulatory oversight, and entrenched cultural norms about meat’s significance to food security. It calls for policy responses that address the economic and political power of the meat industry and the enabling of social and ecological externalities. Finally, it recommends adoption of a whole-of-food system approach to addressing unaccountable industry power.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.07.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global corporate-industrial meat production is associated with harms to social, animal, and planetary health. Although national policy discussions are lacking, some studies suggest addressing these harms through taxation and supply chain standards. However, these proposals overlook the potential role of corporate power in creating and perpetuating these harms. Our study addresses this gap by examining how political, economic, and structural features of food systems enable the meat industry to externalize costs of production and perpetuate ecological and social harms. Here, we analyze three case studies from different stages of global supply chains, revealing a highly concentrated meat industry, close industry-government ties, reduced regulatory oversight, and entrenched cultural norms about meat’s significance to food security. It calls for policy responses that address the economic and political power of the meat industry and the enabling of social and ecological externalities. Finally, it recommends adoption of a whole-of-food system approach to addressing unaccountable industry power.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业-工业肉类供应链中的权力如何促成负外部性:巴西、美国和澳大利亚的三个案例研究
全球企业工业化肉类生产对社会、动物和地球健康造成了危害。虽然缺乏国家政策讨论,但一些研究建议通过税收和供应链标准来解决这些危害。然而,这些建议忽略了企业权力在制造和延续这些危害方面的潜在作用。我们的研究通过考察食品系统的政治、经济和结构特征如何使肉类行业将生产成本外部化,并使生态和社会危害永久化,填补了这一空白。在此,我们分析了来自全球供应链不同阶段的三个案例研究,揭示了高度集中的肉类产业、产业与政府之间的紧密联系、监管力度的减弱以及关于肉类对食品安全重要性的根深蒂固的文化规范。报告呼吁采取政策应对措施,解决肉类行业的经济和政治权力问题,以及社会和生态外部性问题。最后,报告建议采用整体食品系统的方法来解决不负责任的行业权力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
期刊最新文献
Reconciling conservation and development requires enhanced integration and broader aims: A cross-continental assessment of landscape approaches Hope and hype for negative emissions Navigating the obstacles of carbon-negative technologies Scaling biochar solutions for urban carbon dioxide removal Getting real about capturing carbon from the air
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1