Peer or tutor? The congruity effects of service robot role and service type on usage intention

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104429
Yuxuan Li , Jifei Wu , Jiaolong Xue , Xiangyun Zhang
{"title":"Peer or tutor? The congruity effects of service robot role and service type on usage intention","authors":"Yuxuan Li ,&nbsp;Jifei Wu ,&nbsp;Jiaolong Xue ,&nbsp;Xiangyun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The invention of service robots has reduced the labor cost and improved enterprises' efficiency and service quality. However, it is still difficult to enhance consumers' intention to use robot-by-robot design efficiently. Based on social roles of anthropomorphic cues, service robots can be divided into peer (e.g., kind and amiable friends) or tutor (e.g., authoritative and professional experts) robots. From a matching perspective, this paper investigates (1) whether robot role and service type have an impact on consumers' intention to employ service robots in different ways, and (2) how cognitive trust and affective trust can play a mediating role during this process. In this paper, the authors conducted an online a scenario-based experiment and collected a valid sample of 332 consumers. The results show that the participants are more willing to apply the tutor robot in the scenario of utilitarian service, and the peer robot in the scenario of hedonic service. In addition, cognitive trust and affective trust have a matching mediation effect. Specifically, for the utilitarian service, cognitive trust mediates the effect of robot role on consumers' intention to adopt the robots, while the mediating effect of affective trust is not significant. As for the hedonic service, affective trust mediated the effect of robot role on the intention to use, whereas the mediating effect of cognitive trust is not significant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824003068/pdfft?md5=86eb3bacd016bab426c1bdf34adbdd00&pid=1-s2.0-S0001691824003068-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824003068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The invention of service robots has reduced the labor cost and improved enterprises' efficiency and service quality. However, it is still difficult to enhance consumers' intention to use robot-by-robot design efficiently. Based on social roles of anthropomorphic cues, service robots can be divided into peer (e.g., kind and amiable friends) or tutor (e.g., authoritative and professional experts) robots. From a matching perspective, this paper investigates (1) whether robot role and service type have an impact on consumers' intention to employ service robots in different ways, and (2) how cognitive trust and affective trust can play a mediating role during this process. In this paper, the authors conducted an online a scenario-based experiment and collected a valid sample of 332 consumers. The results show that the participants are more willing to apply the tutor robot in the scenario of utilitarian service, and the peer robot in the scenario of hedonic service. In addition, cognitive trust and affective trust have a matching mediation effect. Specifically, for the utilitarian service, cognitive trust mediates the effect of robot role on consumers' intention to adopt the robots, while the mediating effect of affective trust is not significant. As for the hedonic service, affective trust mediated the effect of robot role on the intention to use, whereas the mediating effect of cognitive trust is not significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴还是导师?服务机器人角色和服务类型对使用意向的一致性影响。
服务机器人的发明降低了劳动力成本,提高了企业效率和服务质量。然而,逐个机器人的设计仍难以有效提升消费者的使用意愿。根据拟人化线索的社会角色,服务机器人可分为同伴机器人(如亲切和蔼的朋友)和导师机器人(如权威专业的专家)。本文从匹配的角度出发,研究了(1)机器人角色和服务类型是否会对消费者以不同方式使用服务机器人的意愿产生影响,以及(2)认知信任和情感信任如何在这一过程中发挥中介作用。在本文中,作者开展了一项基于场景的在线实验,并收集了 332 位消费者的有效样本。结果显示,在功利性服务场景中,参与者更愿意使用导师机器人;在享乐性服务场景中,参与者更愿意使用同伴机器人。此外,认知信任和情感信任具有匹配中介效应。具体来说,在功利性服务中,认知信任对机器人角色对消费者采用机器人的意愿有中介效应,而情感信任的中介效应不显著。至于享乐型服务,情感信任中介了机器人角色对使用意向的影响,而认知信任的中介效应不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
期刊最新文献
Exploring gender differences in the relations between passion, grit and flow. Does Despotic Leadership Impact Employees' Career success: The Parallel Mediation Framework. Examining problematic internet use, mattering, and distress in interpersonally vulnerable senior high school students: A longitudinal study during summer holidays and academic terms. Feasibility and effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for improving resilience, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and posttraumatic growth among military medical college students. Leveraging digital skills to reduce cognitive strain: Implications for academic self-efficacy in medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1