Femoral head decentration on hip MRI: comparison between imaging planes, methods of contrast administration, and hip deformities.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Insights into Imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1186/s13244-024-01777-7
Florian Schmaranzer, Tadeus A Becker, Alexander F Heimann, Jose Roshardt, Joseph M Schwab, Stephen B Murphy, Simon D Steppacher, Moritz Tannast, Till D Lerch
{"title":"Femoral head decentration on hip MRI: comparison between imaging planes, methods of contrast administration, and hip deformities.","authors":"Florian Schmaranzer, Tadeus A Becker, Alexander F Heimann, Jose Roshardt, Joseph M Schwab, Stephen B Murphy, Simon D Steppacher, Moritz Tannast, Till D Lerch","doi":"10.1186/s13244-024-01777-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the prevalence of femoral head decentration (FHD) on different MR imaging planes in patients undergoing direct/indirect hip MR arthrography (MRA) with asymptomatic controls and to evaluate its association with osseous deformities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IRB-approved retrospective single-center study of symptomatic hips undergoing direct or indirect hip MRA at 3 T. Asymptomatic participants underwent non-contrast hip MRI at 3 T. FHD was defined as a continuous fluid layer between the acetabulum and femoral head and assessed on axial, sagittal and radial images. The association of intra-articular/intra-venous contrast agents and the prevalence of FHD was evaluated. The association of FHD with osseous deformities and joint damage was assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred ninety-four patients (447 hips, mean age 31 ± 9 years, 247 females) were included and compared to 43 asymptomatic controls (43 hips, mean age 31 ± 6 years, 26 females). FHD was most prevalent on radial images and more frequent in symptomatic hips (30% versus 2%, p < 0.001). FHD prevalence was not associated with the presence/absence of intra-articular contrast agents (30% versus 22%, OR = 1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.5), p = 0.125). FHD was associated with hip dysplasia (OR = 6.1 (3.3-11.1), p < 0.001), excessive femoral torsion (OR = 3.0 (1.3-6.8), p = 0.010), and severe cartilage damage (OR = 3.6 (2.0-6.7), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While rare in asymptomatic patients, femoral head decentration in symptomatic patients is associated with osseous deformities predisposing to hip instability, as well as with extensive cartilage damage.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>Decentration of the femoral head on radial MRA may be interpreted as a sign of hip instability in symptomatic hips without extensive cartilage defects. Its presence could unmask hip instability and yield promise in surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The best method of identifying femoral head decentration is radial MRI. The presence/absence of intra-articular contrast is not associated with femoral head decentration. Femoral head decentration is associated with hip deformities predisposing to hip instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"15 1","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01777-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the prevalence of femoral head decentration (FHD) on different MR imaging planes in patients undergoing direct/indirect hip MR arthrography (MRA) with asymptomatic controls and to evaluate its association with osseous deformities.

Methods: IRB-approved retrospective single-center study of symptomatic hips undergoing direct or indirect hip MRA at 3 T. Asymptomatic participants underwent non-contrast hip MRI at 3 T. FHD was defined as a continuous fluid layer between the acetabulum and femoral head and assessed on axial, sagittal and radial images. The association of intra-articular/intra-venous contrast agents and the prevalence of FHD was evaluated. The association of FHD with osseous deformities and joint damage was assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results: Three-hundred ninety-four patients (447 hips, mean age 31 ± 9 years, 247 females) were included and compared to 43 asymptomatic controls (43 hips, mean age 31 ± 6 years, 26 females). FHD was most prevalent on radial images and more frequent in symptomatic hips (30% versus 2%, p < 0.001). FHD prevalence was not associated with the presence/absence of intra-articular contrast agents (30% versus 22%, OR = 1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.5), p = 0.125). FHD was associated with hip dysplasia (OR = 6.1 (3.3-11.1), p < 0.001), excessive femoral torsion (OR = 3.0 (1.3-6.8), p = 0.010), and severe cartilage damage (OR = 3.6 (2.0-6.7), p < 0.001).

Conclusion: While rare in asymptomatic patients, femoral head decentration in symptomatic patients is associated with osseous deformities predisposing to hip instability, as well as with extensive cartilage damage.

Critical relevance statement: Decentration of the femoral head on radial MRA may be interpreted as a sign of hip instability in symptomatic hips without extensive cartilage defects. Its presence could unmask hip instability and yield promise in surgical decision-making.

Key points: The best method of identifying femoral head decentration is radial MRI. The presence/absence of intra-articular contrast is not associated with femoral head decentration. Femoral head decentration is associated with hip deformities predisposing to hip instability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节磁共振成像中的股骨头分散:成像平面、造影剂使用方法和髋关节畸形之间的比较。
目的比较接受直接/间接髋关节磁共振成像(MRA)的患者与无症状对照组在不同磁共振成像平面上股骨头下垂(FHD)的发生率,并评估其与骨畸形的关系:方法:对接受 3 T 直接或间接髋关节 MRA 检查的无症状髋关节进行经 IRB 批准的单中心回顾性研究。无症状者接受 3 T 非对比髋关节 MRI 检查。FHD被定义为髋臼和股骨头之间的连续液体层,并在轴向、矢状和径向图像上进行评估。评估了关节内/静脉内造影剂与 FHD 发生率的关系。使用多元逻辑回归分析评估了 FHD 与骨畸形和关节损伤的关系:共纳入 394 名患者(447 个髋关节,平均年龄 31 ± 9 岁,247 名女性),并与 43 名无症状对照组患者(43 个髋关节,平均年龄 31 ± 6 岁,26 名女性)进行比较。FHD 在径向图像中最为常见,在有症状的髋关节中更为常见(30% 对 2%,P 结论:FHD 在无症状的髋关节中较为罕见,但在有症状的髋关节中更为常见:虽然在无症状患者中很少见,但在有症状的患者中,股骨头下垂与容易导致髋关节不稳定的骨性畸形以及广泛的软骨损伤有关:在无广泛软骨损伤的有症状髋关节中,桡侧 MRA 上的股骨头下移可被解释为髋关节不稳定的信号。它的出现可揭示髋关节不稳,为手术决策提供依据:要点:识别股骨头脱位的最佳方法是径向磁共振成像。关节内造影剂的存在/不存在与股骨头下垂无关。股骨头下垂与容易导致髋关节不稳定的髋关节畸形有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
期刊最新文献
Impact of hepatic steatosis on liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography and its diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Intratumoral and peritumoral MRI-based radiomics for predicting extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic literature review of safety and efficacy. Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study. Development and external evaluation of a self-learning auto-segmentation model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Assessment (COALA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1