Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15820
Kunyue Li, Chunyun Deng, Daqi Sun, Yuxia Wang, Genxia Li, Lihua Jiang, Tao Wang
{"title":"Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Kunyue Li, Chunyun Deng, Daqi Sun, Yuxia Wang, Genxia Li, Lihua Jiang, Tao Wang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia (EA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address covariates. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were implemented in sequence to find out the factors influencing intrapartum fever. The receiver operating characteristics curve was applied to determine the area under the curve (AUC) of NLR for intrapartum fever.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NLR and duration of EA were independent risk factors for intrapartum fever. The AUC of the combined indicator (NLR + duration of EA) was higher than that of NLR (AUC = 0.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.64) and duration of EA (AUC = 0.702, 95% CI 0.66-0.75), reaching 0.715 (95% CI 0.67-0.76; p < 0.001). NLR increased predictive performance for intrapartum fever when added to the duration of EA (net reclassification index 0.076, p = 0.022; integrated discrimination improvement 0.020, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR has limited predictive power for intrapartum fever. The combination of NLR and duration of epidural analgesia may be considered a promising predictor for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia.</p><p><strong>Synopsis: </strong>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an accessible predictor for the early identification of parturients at risk of intrapartum fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on admission for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia (EA).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address covariates. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were implemented in sequence to find out the factors influencing intrapartum fever. The receiver operating characteristics curve was applied to determine the area under the curve (AUC) of NLR for intrapartum fever.

Results: NLR and duration of EA were independent risk factors for intrapartum fever. The AUC of the combined indicator (NLR + duration of EA) was higher than that of NLR (AUC = 0.583, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.64) and duration of EA (AUC = 0.702, 95% CI 0.66-0.75), reaching 0.715 (95% CI 0.67-0.76; p < 0.001). NLR increased predictive performance for intrapartum fever when added to the duration of EA (net reclassification index 0.076, p = 0.022; integrated discrimination improvement 0.020, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: NLR has limited predictive power for intrapartum fever. The combination of NLR and duration of epidural analgesia may be considered a promising predictor for intrapartum maternal fever in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia.

Synopsis: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an accessible predictor for the early identification of parturients at risk of intrapartum fever.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对产褥期发热的预测价值:使用倾向评分匹配分析的回顾性队列研究。
目的确定接受硬膜外镇痛(EA)的产妇入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对产褥期发热的预测价值:在这项回顾性队列研究中,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来处理协变量。依次进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以找出影响产后发热的因素。结果显示,NLR和EA持续时间是影响产后发热的独立因素:结果:NLR和EA持续时间是产褥热的独立危险因素。综合指标(NLR + EA持续时间)的AUC高于NLR(AUC = 0.583,95%置信区间[CI] 0.53-0.64)和EA持续时间(AUC = 0.702,95% CI 0.66-0.75),达到0.715(95% CI 0.67-0.76;P 结论:NLR和EA持续时间是产后发热的独立危险因素:NLR 对产褥热的预测能力有限。NLR与硬膜外镇痛持续时间的结合可被视为对接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇产期发热的一种有希望的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Routine ultrasound does not improve instrument placement at operative vaginal delivery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Beyond borders: The global impact of violating reproductive human rights. Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN Journal guidelines. Menstrual management using the etonogestrel implant in individuals with intellectual disabilities in Joinville, Brazil. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1