Antihistamine and COVID-19 outcomes in outpatients.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1177/10815589241270449
Soodabeh Samimi, Majid Nimrouzi, Malihe Sousani, Yasaman Vazani
{"title":"Antihistamine and COVID-19 outcomes in outpatients.","authors":"Soodabeh Samimi, Majid Nimrouzi, Malihe Sousani, Yasaman Vazani","doi":"10.1177/10815589241270449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. Since then, researchers have been investigating the efficacy and side effects of its medication, up until now. From the viewpoint of Persian medicine, some medications such as antihistamines may cause retention of secretions and lead to exacerbation and spread of the disease in the body. There are studies with conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of antihistamines in COVID-19. Systematic reviews found a lack of data on beneficial effect of antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold and a limited short-term effect of antihistamines on severity of overall symptoms. This prospective cohort study was designed to investigate the relationship between the use of antihistamines and the severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Three hundred patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 participated in the study in Shiraz, Iran from December 4, 2021 until January 24, 2022. The interviews were conducted via phone call by a single interviewer. Patients were followed weekly for 4 weeks. We collected information by using a data collection form, containing demographic information, underlying disease, COVID-19 symptoms, treatment methods, medications, and a list of antihistamines and herbs that might have been used. Generalized estimating equations were applied to assess the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 and the use of antihistamines, taking into account potential confounding factors such as time and herbal consumption. The difference in the severity of COVID-19 disease in antihistamine users compared to nonusers was not significant in 4 weeks despite the higher baseline severity in nonusers. The comparison of two groups of antihistamine users and nonusers showed that there was a significant difference (p = 0.001) regarding the use of herbal medicines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"857-862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241270449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on March 11, 2020. Since then, researchers have been investigating the efficacy and side effects of its medication, up until now. From the viewpoint of Persian medicine, some medications such as antihistamines may cause retention of secretions and lead to exacerbation and spread of the disease in the body. There are studies with conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of antihistamines in COVID-19. Systematic reviews found a lack of data on beneficial effect of antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold and a limited short-term effect of antihistamines on severity of overall symptoms. This prospective cohort study was designed to investigate the relationship between the use of antihistamines and the severity of COVID-19 symptoms. Three hundred patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 participated in the study in Shiraz, Iran from December 4, 2021 until January 24, 2022. The interviews were conducted via phone call by a single interviewer. Patients were followed weekly for 4 weeks. We collected information by using a data collection form, containing demographic information, underlying disease, COVID-19 symptoms, treatment methods, medications, and a list of antihistamines and herbs that might have been used. Generalized estimating equations were applied to assess the relationship between the severity of COVID-19 and the use of antihistamines, taking into account potential confounding factors such as time and herbal consumption. The difference in the severity of COVID-19 disease in antihistamine users compared to nonusers was not significant in 4 weeks despite the higher baseline severity in nonusers. The comparison of two groups of antihistamine users and nonusers showed that there was a significant difference (p = 0.001) regarding the use of herbal medicines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快讯门诊病人中的抗组胺药和 COVID-19 结果。
世界卫生组织(WHO)于2020年3月11日宣布2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行。从那时起,研究人员就一直在研究其药物的疗效和副作用,直到现在。从波斯医学的角度来看,一些会导致分泌物滞留的药物(如抗组胺药)可能会导致疾病在体内加重和扩散。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在调查抗组胺药的使用与 COVID-19 症状严重程度之间的关系。从2021年12月4日到2022年1月24日,伊朗设拉子的300名确诊为COVID-19的患者被纳入研究。访谈由一名访谈员通过电话进行。每周对患者进行为期四周的随访。我们使用数据收集表收集信息,其中包含人口统计学信息、基础疾病、COVID-19 症状、治疗方法、药物以及可能使用过的抗组胺药和草药清单。应用广义估计方程评估 COVID-19 严重程度与使用抗组胺药之间的关系,同时考虑到时间和草药消耗等潜在混杂因素。与不使用抗组胺药的人相比,使用抗组胺药的人在4周内COVID-19病情严重程度的差异并不显著。抗组胺剂使用者和非使用者两组的比较显示,在使用草药方面存在显著差异(P值=0.001)。与不使用抗组胺药者相比,使用抗组胺药者的 COVID-19 严重程度在 4 周内没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin for peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Long COVID: A risk factor for anxiety, depression, and suicidality? Exploring the association between hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score and all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older patients with osteoarthritis. Prostate cancer screening: Is it time for a new approach? A review article. Short-term efficacy of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1