Management of Chyle Leak in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1097/MPH.0000000000002933
Nabil Alhayek, Abdulkarim Alwani, Luca Pio, Abdelhafeez H Abdelhafeez
{"title":"Management of Chyle Leak in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nabil Alhayek, Abdulkarim Alwani, Luca Pio, Abdelhafeez H Abdelhafeez","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000002933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chyle leak, a rare complication, arises from damage to primary lymphatic vessels due to congenital factors or medical interventions, leading to conditions such as chylothorax and chylous ascites. Managing chyle leaks is challenging, especially in pediatric surgical oncology, often arising as postoperative complications. Treatment options range from conservative dietary adjustments to surgical interventions, depending on leak severity and patient condition. This systematic review examines the management of chyle leaks in pediatric surgical oncology, emphasizing both conservative and surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review involved extensive database searches (EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed) to identify relevant studies on chyle leak management in the pediatric population. The review included studies from 1982 to 2023 and focused on pediatric and adolescent patients, assessing various treatment approaches and outcomes. Nine articles composed of 163 patients (study population size ranging from 2 to 82 patients). Independent reviewers evaluated the selected studies for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9 articles analyzed, 98.8% of pediatric patients initially received conservative management for chyle leaks, with 11.7% eventually requiring surgical intervention due to persistent leaks (8, 10, and 16 to 22). Neuroblastoma resection is associated with 20% to 40% rate of chyle leak, and the extent of lymphadenectomy has been identified as a risk factor for chyle leak. The study highlighted variability in clinical success rates based on conservative management approaches.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Chyle leak, while rare, presents a complex challenge, especially in pediatric surgical oncology. Various causes and treatment options exist, with a preference for conservative management initially and surgical intervention in specific circumstances. Factors such as leak severity and patient condition guide the choice between approaches. However, the scarcity of comparative data and randomized trials in the pediatric population necessitates further research to establish optimal management strategies for chyle leaks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conservative management of chyle leaks has proven to be the preferred approach in early stages of treatment, whereas surgical management could be the preferred choice in certain situations. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e481-e486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000002933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chyle leak, a rare complication, arises from damage to primary lymphatic vessels due to congenital factors or medical interventions, leading to conditions such as chylothorax and chylous ascites. Managing chyle leaks is challenging, especially in pediatric surgical oncology, often arising as postoperative complications. Treatment options range from conservative dietary adjustments to surgical interventions, depending on leak severity and patient condition. This systematic review examines the management of chyle leaks in pediatric surgical oncology, emphasizing both conservative and surgical approaches.

Methods: This systematic review involved extensive database searches (EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed) to identify relevant studies on chyle leak management in the pediatric population. The review included studies from 1982 to 2023 and focused on pediatric and adolescent patients, assessing various treatment approaches and outcomes. Nine articles composed of 163 patients (study population size ranging from 2 to 82 patients). Independent reviewers evaluated the selected studies for inclusion.

Results: Among 9 articles analyzed, 98.8% of pediatric patients initially received conservative management for chyle leaks, with 11.7% eventually requiring surgical intervention due to persistent leaks (8, 10, and 16 to 22). Neuroblastoma resection is associated with 20% to 40% rate of chyle leak, and the extent of lymphadenectomy has been identified as a risk factor for chyle leak. The study highlighted variability in clinical success rates based on conservative management approaches.

Discussion: Chyle leak, while rare, presents a complex challenge, especially in pediatric surgical oncology. Various causes and treatment options exist, with a preference for conservative management initially and surgical intervention in specific circumstances. Factors such as leak severity and patient condition guide the choice between approaches. However, the scarcity of comparative data and randomized trials in the pediatric population necessitates further research to establish optimal management strategies for chyle leaks.

Conclusions: Conservative management of chyle leaks has proven to be the preferred approach in early stages of treatment, whereas surgical management could be the preferred choice in certain situations. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿肿瘤外科胰液渗漏的处理:系统回顾
导言:胰液漏是一种罕见的并发症,是由于先天因素或医疗干预导致原发性淋巴管受损,从而引发乳糜胸和乳糜腹水等病症。处理糜烂性渗漏具有挑战性,尤其是在儿科肿瘤外科中,通常是作为术后并发症出现。根据渗漏的严重程度和患者的情况,治疗方案从保守的饮食调整到手术干预不等。这篇系统性综述探讨了儿科肿瘤外科胰液渗漏的治疗方法,强调了保守治疗和手术治疗两种方法:本系统性综述通过广泛的数据库搜索(EMBASE、Web of Science 和 PubMed)来确定儿科糜烂性渗漏治疗的相关研究。该综述包括1982年至2023年的研究,重点关注儿科和青少年患者,评估各种治疗方法和效果。九篇文章共涉及 163 名患者(研究人群规模从 2 到 82 名患者不等)。独立评审员对所选研究进行了评估:在分析的9篇文章中,98.8%的儿科患者最初都接受了糜烂性渗漏的保守治疗,11.7%的患者最终因渗漏持续存在而需要手术治疗(8、10、16至22)。神经母细胞瘤切除术与 20% 至 40% 的胰液渗漏率有关,淋巴腺切除范围已被确定为胰液渗漏的风险因素。该研究强调了基于保守治疗方法的临床成功率差异:讨论:胰液漏虽然罕见,但却是一个复杂的挑战,尤其是在儿科肿瘤外科。存在各种原因和治疗方案,最初倾向于保守治疗,在特定情况下进行手术干预。渗漏严重程度和患者状况等因素决定了不同方法的选择。然而,由于缺乏针对儿科人群的比较数据和随机试验,因此有必要开展进一步研究,以确定糜烂性渗漏的最佳治疗策略:结论:事实证明,在治疗的早期阶段,糜烂性渗漏的保守治疗是首选方法,而在某些情况下,手术治疗可能是首选。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来进一步评估这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.
期刊最新文献
Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor of the Brain in a Young Adult With Down Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review. Elevated Interleukin-6 Levels as a Potential Marker of Neonatal Morbidity in Full-term Infants With Polycythemia: A Prospective Study. Case Report of Dinutuximab-induced Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome. Hepatoblastoma in a 13-month-old Male With Oculofaciocardiodental Syndrome. Retrospective Comparison of Targeted Anticancer Drugs Predicted by the CNS-TAP Tool Versus Those Selected by a Molecularly Driven Tumor Board in Children With DIPG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1