A New Validated Approach for Identifying Childhood Immunizations in Electronic Health Records in the United Kingdom.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1002/pds.5848
Anne M Suffel, Jemma L Walker, Colin Campbell, Helena Carreira, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Helen I McDonald
{"title":"A New Validated Approach for Identifying Childhood Immunizations in Electronic Health Records in the United Kingdom.","authors":"Anne M Suffel, Jemma L Walker, Colin Campbell, Helena Carreira, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Helen I McDonald","doi":"10.1002/pds.5848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Routinely collected electronic health records (EHR) offer a valuable opportunity to carry out research on immunization uptake, effectiveness, and safety, using large and representative samples of the population. In contrast to other drugs, vaccines do not require electronic prescription in many settings, which may lead to ambiguous coding of vaccination status and timing.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We propose a comprehensive algorithm to identifying childhood immunizations in routinely collected EHR. In order to deal with ambiguous coding, over-recording, and backdating in EHR, we suggest an approach combining a wide range of medical codes in combination to identify vaccination events and using appropriate wash-out periods and quality checks. We illustrate this approach on a cohort of children born between 2006 and 2014 followed up to the age of five in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, a UK primary care dataset of EHR, and validate the results against national estimates of vaccine coverage by NHS Digital and Public Health England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our algorithm reproduced estimates of vaccination coverage, which are comparable to official national estimates and allows to approximate the age at vaccination. Electronic prescription data only do not cover vaccination events sufficiently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our new proposed method could be used to provide a more accurate estimation of vaccination coverage and timing of vaccination for researchers and policymakers using EHR. As with all observational research using real-world data, it is important that researchers understand the context of the used dataset used and the clinical practice of recording.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"33 8","pages":"e5848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Routinely collected electronic health records (EHR) offer a valuable opportunity to carry out research on immunization uptake, effectiveness, and safety, using large and representative samples of the population. In contrast to other drugs, vaccines do not require electronic prescription in many settings, which may lead to ambiguous coding of vaccination status and timing.

Methodology: We propose a comprehensive algorithm to identifying childhood immunizations in routinely collected EHR. In order to deal with ambiguous coding, over-recording, and backdating in EHR, we suggest an approach combining a wide range of medical codes in combination to identify vaccination events and using appropriate wash-out periods and quality checks. We illustrate this approach on a cohort of children born between 2006 and 2014 followed up to the age of five in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, a UK primary care dataset of EHR, and validate the results against national estimates of vaccine coverage by NHS Digital and Public Health England.

Results: Our algorithm reproduced estimates of vaccination coverage, which are comparable to official national estimates and allows to approximate the age at vaccination. Electronic prescription data only do not cover vaccination events sufficiently.

Conclusion: Our new proposed method could be used to provide a more accurate estimation of vaccination coverage and timing of vaccination for researchers and policymakers using EHR. As with all observational research using real-world data, it is important that researchers understand the context of the used dataset used and the clinical practice of recording.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国电子健康记录中识别儿童免疫接种的新验证方法。
背景:常规收集的电子健康记录(EHR)为利用大量具有代表性的人口样本开展有关免疫接种率、有效性和安全性的研究提供了宝贵的机会。与其他药物不同的是,疫苗在很多情况下不需要电子处方,这可能会导致疫苗接种状态和接种时间的编码模糊不清:我们提出了一种综合算法来识别常规电子病历中的儿童免疫接种。为了解决电子病历中编码不清、记录过多和追溯等问题,我们提出了一种将多种医疗编码结合起来的方法,以识别疫苗接种事件,并使用适当的清洗期和质量检查。我们在临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)Aurum(英国电子病历的初级保健数据集)中对 2006 年至 2014 年间出生并随访至五岁的儿童队列中说明了这一方法,并根据英国国家医疗服务系统数字(NHS Digital)和英格兰公共卫生部门对全国疫苗接种覆盖率的估计值对结果进行了验证:我们的算法再现了疫苗接种覆盖率的估计值,该估计值与国家官方估计值相当,并可近似估计接种疫苗的年龄。仅有电子处方数据无法充分涵盖疫苗接种事件:我们提出的新方法可用于为使用电子病历的研究人员和政策制定者提供更准确的疫苗接种覆盖率和接种时间估计。与所有使用真实世界数据的观察性研究一样,研究人员必须了解所用数据集的背景和记录的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
期刊最新文献
Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: Time-To-Event Analysis Approaches in Pharmacoepidemiology. Hydrochlorothiazide Use and Risk of Skin Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. The Oncology QCARD Initiative: Fostering efficient evaluation of initial real-world data proposals. Validation Study of the Claims-Based Algorithm Using the International Classification of Diseases Codes to Identify Patients With Coronavirus Disease in Japan From 2020 to 2022: The VENUS Study. A Validated Algorithm to Identify Hepatic Decompensation in the Veterans Health Administration Electronic Health Record System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1