Can Medical-Legal Partnerships Do More to Advance Reproductive Justice After Dobbs?

Q2 Social Sciences AMA journal of ethics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2024.655
Medha Devanagondi Makhlouf, Natasha Rappazzo
{"title":"Can Medical-Legal Partnerships Do More to Advance Reproductive Justice After <i>Dobbs</i>?","authors":"Medha Devanagondi Makhlouf, Natasha Rappazzo","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2024.655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The medical-legal partnership (MLP) and reproductive justice (RJ) movements both seek to solve complex problems, serve diverse populations with intersectional challenges, and resolve community conditions that impact people's ability to reach their highest health potential. Yet MLPs have been overlooked as a strategy to advance reproductive health and justice. MLP has distinct advantages for advancing RJ, and many MLPs might already be doing RJ work without referring to it by name. By intentionally adopting an RJ strategy and explicitly addressing the unmet social and legal needs that limit people's ability to plan their reproductive futures, MLPs can better serve their clients and contribute to the movement to combat reproductive oppression.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"26 8","pages":"E655-664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The medical-legal partnership (MLP) and reproductive justice (RJ) movements both seek to solve complex problems, serve diverse populations with intersectional challenges, and resolve community conditions that impact people's ability to reach their highest health potential. Yet MLPs have been overlooked as a strategy to advance reproductive health and justice. MLP has distinct advantages for advancing RJ, and many MLPs might already be doing RJ work without referring to it by name. By intentionally adopting an RJ strategy and explicitly addressing the unmet social and legal needs that limit people's ability to plan their reproductive futures, MLPs can better serve their clients and contribute to the movement to combat reproductive oppression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多布斯之后,医疗与法律合作能否为促进生殖正义做出更大贡献?
医疗法律伙伴关系(MLP)和生殖正义(RJ)运动都寻求解决复杂的问题,为面临交叉挑战的不同人群服务,并解决影响人们发挥最大健康潜能的社区条件。然而,作为推进生殖健康与正义的一种战略,MLP 却一直被忽视。MLP 在推进生殖健康与正义方面具有独特的优势,许多 MLP 可能已经在开展生殖健康与正义工作,但却没有提及其名称。通过有意识地采用 RJ 战略,明确解决限制人们规划其生殖未来的能力的未得到满足的社会和法律需求,MLP 可以更好地为其客户服务,并为打击生殖压迫的运动做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
期刊最新文献
How We Lie About Pain. Key Roles of Epistemic Humility in OB/GYN Care of Patients in Acute Non-Labor and Delivery Pain Care. Learning to Communicate With Patients About Potentially Painful Gynecologic Procedures. Performing Clarity, Sincerity, and Endurance. Response to "Humanity and Inhumanity of Nonhuman Primate Research".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1