Why MLP Legal Care Should Be Financed as Health Care.

Q2 Social Sciences AMA journal of ethics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2024.640
William M Sage, Keegan D Warren
{"title":"Why MLP Legal Care Should Be Financed as Health Care.","authors":"William M Sage, Keegan D Warren","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2024.640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical-legal partnership (MLP) integrates the unique expertise of lawyers into collaborative clinical environments. MLP teams meet the needs of individual patients while also detecting structural problems at the root of health inequities and advancing solutions at the institutional, community, and system levels. Yet MLPs today operate in limited settings and survive on scant budgets. Expanding their impact requires secure funding. Financing MLPs as health care can do the following: (1) help address inequity at the point of care; (2) enable expert diagnosis and treatment of nonmedical drivers of health; (3) enhance team-based practice in health care organizations; (4) offer another way for clinicians to participate in advocacy; and (5) bolster a broader movement to increase access to justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"26 8","pages":"E640-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2024.640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical-legal partnership (MLP) integrates the unique expertise of lawyers into collaborative clinical environments. MLP teams meet the needs of individual patients while also detecting structural problems at the root of health inequities and advancing solutions at the institutional, community, and system levels. Yet MLPs today operate in limited settings and survive on scant budgets. Expanding their impact requires secure funding. Financing MLPs as health care can do the following: (1) help address inequity at the point of care; (2) enable expert diagnosis and treatment of nonmedical drivers of health; (3) enhance team-based practice in health care organizations; (4) offer another way for clinicians to participate in advocacy; and (5) bolster a broader movement to increase access to justice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么 MLP 法律护理应像医疗保健一样筹资?
医疗法律伙伴关系(MLP)将律师的独特专长融入合作性临床环境。MLP 团队在满足患者个人需求的同时,还能发现造成医疗不公平的结构性问题,并在机构、社区和系统层面提出解决方案。然而,如今的MLP运作环境有限,预算匮乏。扩大其影响需要可靠的资金。资助作为医疗保健的 MLP 可以做到以下几点:(1) 有助于在护理点解决不公平问题;(2) 能够对影响健康的非医疗因素进行专家诊断和治疗;(3) 加强医疗机构中以团队为基础的实践;(4) 为临床医生提供另一种参与宣传的方式;以及 (5) 支持更广泛的运动,以增加诉诸司法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
期刊最新文献
How We Lie About Pain. Key Roles of Epistemic Humility in OB/GYN Care of Patients in Acute Non-Labor and Delivery Pain Care. Learning to Communicate With Patients About Potentially Painful Gynecologic Procedures. Performing Clarity, Sincerity, and Endurance. Response to "Humanity and Inhumanity of Nonhuman Primate Research".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1