Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101411
Jérémie Guillemin , Benjamin Rieu , Olivier Huet , Léonie Villeret , Stéphanie Pons , Anne Bignon , Quentin de Roux , Raphaël Cinotti , Vincent Legros , Gaëtan Plantefeve , Claire Dayhot-Fizelier , Edris Omar , Cyril Cadoz , Fanny Bounes , Cécile Caplin , Karim Toumert , Thibault Martinez , Damien Bouvier , Maxime Coutrot , Thomas Godet , Florian Blanchard
{"title":"Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study","authors":"Jérémie Guillemin ,&nbsp;Benjamin Rieu ,&nbsp;Olivier Huet ,&nbsp;Léonie Villeret ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Pons ,&nbsp;Anne Bignon ,&nbsp;Quentin de Roux ,&nbsp;Raphaël Cinotti ,&nbsp;Vincent Legros ,&nbsp;Gaëtan Plantefeve ,&nbsp;Claire Dayhot-Fizelier ,&nbsp;Edris Omar ,&nbsp;Cyril Cadoz ,&nbsp;Fanny Bounes ,&nbsp;Cécile Caplin ,&nbsp;Karim Toumert ,&nbsp;Thibault Martinez ,&nbsp;Damien Bouvier ,&nbsp;Maxime Coutrot ,&nbsp;Thomas Godet ,&nbsp;Florian Blanchard","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% <em>vs.</em> 8% ICU-mortality, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% <em>vs.</em> 11%, <em>p</em> = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"43 5","pages":"Article 101411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824000699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU.

Methods

A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation.

Results

During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% vs. 8% ICU-mortality, p < 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% vs. 11%, p = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO2/FiO2 at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation.

Conclusion

Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国重症监护病房意外拔管发生率及其结果的前瞻性多中心评估。安全重症监护室研究。
背景:我们旨在确定重症监护室意外拔管和自行拔管的流行病学和结果:在法国 47 家重症监护室开展了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。每个中心至少连续三个月记录机械通气(MV)天数、计划内和计划外拔管次数,以评估 UE 发生率。根据 UE 机制(意外拔管或自行拔管)对患者特征、UE 环境因素和结果进行了比较。利用倾向匹配人群对自行拔管与计划拔管的结果进行了比较。最后,确定了自我拔管后拔管失败(第 7 天前再次插管)的风险因素:结果:在为期 12 个月的纳入期内,我们发现每 100 个 MV 天的 UE 发生率为 1.0。UE占所有气管插管拔除率的9%。在 605 例 UE 中,88% 为自行拔管,12% 为意外拔管。后者比自行拔管的预后更差(34%vs.8%的ICU死亡率,拔管时的p 2/FiO2、断奶过程未持续、拔管后立即出现呼吸衰竭是自行拔管失败的独立预测因素):结论:非计划性拔管(主要表现为自行拔管)在重症监护病房很常见,占所有气管内拔管的 9%。虽然意外拔管是一种严重且不常见的不良事件,但与计划拔管相比,自行拔管不会增加死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
期刊最新文献
The association between neuraxial labor analgesia and subacute pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network. Developing a sustainable team in critical care: focus on gender-based diversity Intraoperative ketamine and pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): A systematic review and meta-analysis Is quantitative neuromuscular monitoring mandatory after administration of the recommended dose of sugammadex? A prospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1