Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241265013
Min Jee Kim, Ye-Jee Kim, Daehyun Jeong, Seonok Kim, Seokchan Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Wook Jo
{"title":"Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.","authors":"Min Jee Kim, Ye-Jee Kim, Daehyun Jeong, Seonok Kim, Seokchan Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Kyung-Wook Jo","doi":"10.1177/17562848241265013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents <i>versus</i> non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (<i>n</i> = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241265013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.

Objectives: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.

Design: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.

Methods: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.

Results: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.

Conclusion: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受非抗-TNF 生物制剂或抗-TNF-α 制剂治疗的韩国炎症性肠病患者发生严重感染和结核病的比较风险:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
背景:在韩国人群中,尚未根据抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α药物与非抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂(维妥珠单抗/奥司替尼)的使用情况同时评估炎症性肠病(IBD)患者发生严重感染和活动性肺结核的风险:我们比较了接受非抗-TNF生物制剂(维妥珠单抗/奥司替尼)或抗-TNF-α制剂治疗的韩国IBD患者发生严重感染和活动性肺结核的风险:方法:回顾2007年1月至2021年2月期间健康保险审查和评估服务的索赔数据(占韩国人口的97%),纳入2017年至2020年期间开始使用维多珠单抗/奥斯特库单抗或抗-TNF-α治疗的成人IBD患者(n = 6123)。分析了随访期间需要住院/急诊就诊的严重感染或活动性肺结核风险的组间差异:在平均随访1.55±1.05年和0.84±0.69年期间接受抗TNF-α药物或维多珠单抗/奥司替尼治疗的患者中,严重感染发生率分别为9.43/100人年和6.87/100人年。多变量分析显示,使用维多珠单抗/奥司替尼或抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗的严重感染风险在组间无明显差异;与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物相比,使用维多珠单抗/奥司替尼的调整后相对风险为0.81(95%置信区间为0.46-1.44,P = 0.478)。在接受抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物和维多珠单抗/奥司替尼治疗的患者中,活动性肺结核的发病率分别为每100人年0.87例和0.37例。与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物相比,维多珠单抗/奥司替尼的相对风险为0.31(95%置信区间为0.07-1.26,P = 0.101)。在比较维多珠单抗和乌斯特库单抗与抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物的子集分析中,也观察到类似的结果:结论:在韩国IBD患者中,与抗肿瘤坏死因子α药物相比,非抗肿瘤坏死因子生物制剂(维多利珠单抗/乌斯特库单抗)发生严重感染或活动性肺结核的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of colorectal cancer in patients with Crohn's disease: American versus Korean tertiary referral center perspectives. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies in ulcerative colitis. Weekend endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has similar outcomes as weekday procedures-a propensity score match analysis of the Hungarian ERCP Registry. Effectiveness of autologous emulsified stromal vascular fraction tissue injection for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a pilot study. Depression influences fatigue in inflammatory bowel disease amongst other factors: a structural modelling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1