{"title":"Evaluation Resources for Asthma Programs and Beyond.","authors":"Samuel Dunklin, Sarah Gill, Maureen Wilce","doi":"10.5888/pcd21.240035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluation can ensure the quality of public health programs. Systematic efforts to identify and fully engage everyone involved with or affected by a program can provide critical information about asthma programs and the broader environment in which they operate. To assist evaluators working at programs funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) National Asthma Control Program (NACP), we developed a package of tools that build on the CDC's 1999 Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health. The resulting suite of evaluation tools guides evaluators through a structured but flexible process, engaging a diverse array of interest holders and actively involving them in evaluation planning and implementation, all while strengthening their capacity to meaningfully contribute to the evaluation process. For our newest tool, our team reviewed the recent evaluation literature to create an enhanced version of the 1999 framework that describes important elements of professional evaluation practice. Although the original framework describes the steps to take in conducting an evaluation and the standards for a high-quality evaluation, our enhanced framework includes an explanation of how evaluators should approach their work: by incorporating critical reflection, interpersonal competence, situational awareness, and cultural responsiveness. In this article, we highlight many of the evaluation resources our team has created since the NACP's inception, culminating in a free e-text called Planting the Seeds of High-Quality Program Evaluation in Public Health. Public health professionals working in many types of programs - not just asthma - may find these resources useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":51273,"journal":{"name":"Preventing Chronic Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"E57"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventing Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluation can ensure the quality of public health programs. Systematic efforts to identify and fully engage everyone involved with or affected by a program can provide critical information about asthma programs and the broader environment in which they operate. To assist evaluators working at programs funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) National Asthma Control Program (NACP), we developed a package of tools that build on the CDC's 1999 Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health. The resulting suite of evaluation tools guides evaluators through a structured but flexible process, engaging a diverse array of interest holders and actively involving them in evaluation planning and implementation, all while strengthening their capacity to meaningfully contribute to the evaluation process. For our newest tool, our team reviewed the recent evaluation literature to create an enhanced version of the 1999 framework that describes important elements of professional evaluation practice. Although the original framework describes the steps to take in conducting an evaluation and the standards for a high-quality evaluation, our enhanced framework includes an explanation of how evaluators should approach their work: by incorporating critical reflection, interpersonal competence, situational awareness, and cultural responsiveness. In this article, we highlight many of the evaluation resources our team has created since the NACP's inception, culminating in a free e-text called Planting the Seeds of High-Quality Program Evaluation in Public Health. Public health professionals working in many types of programs - not just asthma - may find these resources useful.
评估可以确保公共卫生计划的质量。通过系统性的工作来识别并充分调动与项目有关或受项目影响的每个人,可以提供有关哮喘项目及其运行环境的重要信息。为了帮助由美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的国家哮喘控制项目(NACP)资助的项目的评估人员,我们在美国疾病控制与预防中心 1999 年公共卫生项目评估框架的基础上开发了一套工具。这套评估工具指导评估人员通过一个结构化但灵活的过程,让不同的利益相关者参与进来,并让他们积极参与评估规划和实施,同时加强他们的能力,为评估过程做出有意义的贡献。对于我们的最新工具,我们的团队回顾了最近的评估文献,创建了 1999 年框架的增强版,该框架描述了专业评估实践的重要因素。尽管最初的框架描述了开展评估的步骤和高质量评估的标准,但我们的增强版框架包括了对评估人员应如何开展工作的解释:通过纳入批判性反思、人际交往能力、情景意识和文化响应能力。在这篇文章中,我们重点介绍了自 NACP 成立以来,我们的团队所创建的许多评估资源,最终形成了一份免费的电子文本,名为《在公共卫生领域播下高质量项目评估的种子》(Planting the Seeds of High-Quality Program Evaluation in Public Health)。从事多种类型项目(不仅仅是哮喘项目)的公共卫生专业人员可能会发现这些资源非常有用。
期刊介绍:
Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The mission of PCD is to promote the open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention. The vision of PCD is to be the premier forum where practitioners and policy makers inform research and researchers help practitioners and policy makers more effectively improve the health of the population. Articles focus on preventing and controlling chronic diseases and conditions, promoting health, and examining the biological, behavioral, physical, and social determinants of health and their impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality across the life span.