International Benchmark for Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurement in Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT of Lymphoma Patients: A Milestone Toward Clinical Implementation.

Ronald Boellaard, Irène Buvat, Christophe Nioche, Luca Ceriani, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau, Luca Guerra, Rodney J Hicks, Salim Kanoun, Carsten Kobe, Annika Loft, Heiko Schöder, Annibale Versari, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Gerben J C Zwezerijnen, Josée M Zijlstra, N George Mikhaeel, Andrea Gallamini, Tarec C El-Galaly, Christine Hanoun, Stephane Chauvie, Romain Ricci, Emanuele Zucca, Michel Meignan, Sally F Barrington
{"title":"International Benchmark for Total Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurement in Baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT of Lymphoma Patients: A Milestone Toward Clinical Implementation.","authors":"Ronald Boellaard, Irène Buvat, Christophe Nioche, Luca Ceriani, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau, Luca Guerra, Rodney J Hicks, Salim Kanoun, Carsten Kobe, Annika Loft, Heiko Schöder, Annibale Versari, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Gerben J C Zwezerijnen, Josée M Zijlstra, N George Mikhaeel, Andrea Gallamini, Tarec C El-Galaly, Christine Hanoun, Stephane Chauvie, Romain Ricci, Emanuele Zucca, Michel Meignan, Sally F Barrington","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.124.267789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is prognostic in lymphoma. However, cutoff values for risk stratification vary markedly, according to the tumor delineation method used. We aimed to create a standardized TMTV benchmark dataset allowing TMTV to be tested and applied as a reproducible biomarker. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans were identified with a range of disease distributions (20 follicular, 20 Hodgkin, and 20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). TMTV was measured by 12 nuclear medicine experts, each analyzing 20 cases split across subtypes, with each case processed by 3-4 readers. LIFEx or ACCURATE software was chosen according to reader preference. Analysis was performed stepwise: TMTV1 with automated preselection of lesions using an SUV of at least 4 and a volume of at least 3 cm<sup>3</sup> with single-click removal of physiologic uptake; TMTV2 with additional removal of reactive bone marrow and spleen with single clicks; TMTV3 with manual editing to remove other physiologic uptake, if required; and TMTV4 with optional addition of lesions using mouse clicks with an SUV of at least 4 (no volume threshold). <b>Results:</b> The final TMTV (TMTV4) ranged from 8 to 2,288 cm<sup>3</sup>, showing excellent agreement among all readers in 87% of cases (52/60) with a difference of less than 10% or less than 10 cm<sup>3</sup> In 70% of the cases, TMTV4 equaled TMTV1, requiring no additional reader interaction. Differences in the TMTV4 were exclusively related to reader interpretation of lesion inclusion or physiologic high-uptake region removal, not to the choice of software. For 5 cases, large TMTV differences (>25%) were due to disagreement about inclusion of diffuse splenic uptake. <b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed segmentation method enabled highly reproducible TMTV measurements, with minimal reader interaction in 70% of the patients. The inclusion or exclusion of diffuse splenic uptake requires definition of specific criteria according to lymphoma subtype. The publicly available proposed benchmark allows comparison of study results and could serve as a reference to test improvements using other segmentation approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1343-1348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is prognostic in lymphoma. However, cutoff values for risk stratification vary markedly, according to the tumor delineation method used. We aimed to create a standardized TMTV benchmark dataset allowing TMTV to be tested and applied as a reproducible biomarker. Methods: Sixty baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were identified with a range of disease distributions (20 follicular, 20 Hodgkin, and 20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). TMTV was measured by 12 nuclear medicine experts, each analyzing 20 cases split across subtypes, with each case processed by 3-4 readers. LIFEx or ACCURATE software was chosen according to reader preference. Analysis was performed stepwise: TMTV1 with automated preselection of lesions using an SUV of at least 4 and a volume of at least 3 cm3 with single-click removal of physiologic uptake; TMTV2 with additional removal of reactive bone marrow and spleen with single clicks; TMTV3 with manual editing to remove other physiologic uptake, if required; and TMTV4 with optional addition of lesions using mouse clicks with an SUV of at least 4 (no volume threshold). Results: The final TMTV (TMTV4) ranged from 8 to 2,288 cm3, showing excellent agreement among all readers in 87% of cases (52/60) with a difference of less than 10% or less than 10 cm3 In 70% of the cases, TMTV4 equaled TMTV1, requiring no additional reader interaction. Differences in the TMTV4 were exclusively related to reader interpretation of lesion inclusion or physiologic high-uptake region removal, not to the choice of software. For 5 cases, large TMTV differences (>25%) were due to disagreement about inclusion of diffuse splenic uptake. Conclusion: The proposed segmentation method enabled highly reproducible TMTV measurements, with minimal reader interaction in 70% of the patients. The inclusion or exclusion of diffuse splenic uptake requires definition of specific criteria according to lymphoma subtype. The publicly available proposed benchmark allows comparison of study results and could serve as a reference to test improvements using other segmentation approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
淋巴瘤患者基线 18F-FDG PET/CT 总代谢肿瘤体积测量的国际基准:临床应用的里程碑。
总代谢肿瘤体积(TMTV)是淋巴瘤的预后指标。然而,根据所用肿瘤划分方法的不同,风险分层的临界值也明显不同。我们的目标是创建一个标准化的 TMTV 基准数据集,以便将 TMTV 作为可重复的生物标记物进行测试和应用。方法确定了 60 例基线 18F-FDG PET/CT 扫描,这些扫描具有不同的疾病分布(20 例滤泡性淋巴瘤、20 例霍奇金淋巴瘤和 20 例弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤)。由 12 位核医学专家测量 TMTV,每位专家分析 20 个病例,每个病例由 3-4 位阅读者处理,每个病例按亚型划分。根据阅读者的偏好选择 LIFEx 或 ACCURATE 软件。分析是逐步进行的:TMTV1 使用 SUV 至少为 4 和体积至少为 3 cm3 的自动预选病灶,单击去除生理性摄取;TMTV2 单击去除反应性骨髓和脾脏;TMTV3 手动编辑以去除其他生理性摄取(如需要);TMTV4 使用鼠标单击增加病灶,SUV 至少为 4(无体积阈值)。结果最终的 TMTV(TMTV4)介于 8 到 2,288 立方厘米之间,87% 的病例(52/60)显示所有读片者之间的一致性极佳,差异小于 10% 或小于 10 立方厘米,70% 的病例中,TMTV4 等同于 TMTV1,无需额外的读片者互动。TMTV4 的差异完全与读者对病变纳入或生理高摄取区去除的解释有关,而与软件的选择无关。有 5 个病例的 TMTV 差异较大(>25%),原因是对是否纳入弥漫性脾摄取存在分歧。结论在 70% 的患者中,所建议的分割方法可使 TMTV 测量结果具有高度的可重复性,读者之间的交互作用极小。纳入或排除弥漫性脾摄取需要根据淋巴瘤亚型定义特定标准。公开的拟议基准可对研究结果进行比较,并可作为使用其他分割方法测试改进情况的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meningioma Revisited: Should Whole-Body Staging with [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT of High-Grade Meningiomas Become Standard Practice? SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) PET. Solving Challenging Puzzles: Heather Jacene Talks with Johannes Czernin About Leadership in Clinical Nuclear Medicine and the SNMMI. [11C]PS13 Demonstrates Pharmacologically Selective and Substantial Binding to Cyclooxygenase-1 in the Human Brain. Imaging of the Aging Human Brain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1