ALARA principles in practice: reduced frame and pulse rates for middle meningeal artery embolization.

Arvin R Wali, Ryan W Sindewald, Michael G Brandel, Sarath Pathuri, Brian R Hirshman, Javier A Bravo, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa
{"title":"ALARA principles in practice: reduced frame and pulse rates for middle meningeal artery embolization.","authors":"Arvin R Wali, Ryan W Sindewald, Michael G Brandel, Sarath Pathuri, Brian R Hirshman, Javier A Bravo, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As the prevalence of neuroendovascular interventions increases, it is critical to mitigate unnecessary radiation for patients, providers, and health care staff. Our group previously demonstrated reduced radiation dose and exposure during diagnostic angiography by reducing the default pulse and frame rates. We applied the same technique for basic neuroendovascular interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data after implementing a quality improvement protocol in which pulse rate and frame rate were reduced from 15 p/s to 7.5 p/s and 7.5 f/s to 4.0 f/s respectively. We studied consecutive, unilateral middle meningeal artery embolizations treated with particles. Total radiation dose, radiation per angiographic run, total radiation exposure, and exposure per run were calculated. Multivariable log-linear regression was performed to account for patient body mass index (BMI), number of angiographic runs, and number of vessels catheterized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 consecutive, unilateral middle meningeal artery embolizations were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation reduction protocol was associated with a 39.2% decrease in the total radiation dose and a 37.1% decrease in radiation dose per run. The protocol was associated with a 41.6% decrease in the total radiation exposure and a 39.5% decrease in exposure per run.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiation reduction protocols can be readily applied to neuroendovascular interventions without increasing overall fluoroscopy time and reduce radiation dose and exposure by 39.2% and 41.6% respectively. We strongly encourage all interventionalists to be cognizant of pulse rate and frame rate when performing routine interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"293-297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2024.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As the prevalence of neuroendovascular interventions increases, it is critical to mitigate unnecessary radiation for patients, providers, and health care staff. Our group previously demonstrated reduced radiation dose and exposure during diagnostic angiography by reducing the default pulse and frame rates. We applied the same technique for basic neuroendovascular interventions.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data after implementing a quality improvement protocol in which pulse rate and frame rate were reduced from 15 p/s to 7.5 p/s and 7.5 f/s to 4.0 f/s respectively. We studied consecutive, unilateral middle meningeal artery embolizations treated with particles. Total radiation dose, radiation per angiographic run, total radiation exposure, and exposure per run were calculated. Multivariable log-linear regression was performed to account for patient body mass index (BMI), number of angiographic runs, and number of vessels catheterized.

Results: A total of 20 consecutive, unilateral middle meningeal artery embolizations were retrospectively analyzed. The radiation reduction protocol was associated with a 39.2% decrease in the total radiation dose and a 37.1% decrease in radiation dose per run. The protocol was associated with a 41.6% decrease in the total radiation exposure and a 39.5% decrease in exposure per run.

Conclusions: Radiation reduction protocols can be readily applied to neuroendovascular interventions without increasing overall fluoroscopy time and reduce radiation dose and exposure by 39.2% and 41.6% respectively. We strongly encourage all interventionalists to be cognizant of pulse rate and frame rate when performing routine interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ALARA 原则在实践中的应用:降低脑膜中动脉栓塞的帧率和脉搏率。
目的:随着神经内血管介入治疗的普及,减少对患者、医疗服务提供者和医护人员的不必要辐射至关重要。我们的研究小组之前通过降低默认脉冲和帧频,减少了诊断性血管造影的辐射剂量和暴露。我们将同样的技术应用于基本的神经内血管介入治疗:方法:在实施质量改进方案后,我们对前瞻性获取的数据进行了回顾性审查,其中脉率和帧率分别从 15 p/s 降至 7.5 p/s 和 7.5 f/s 降至 4.0 f/s。我们研究了用粒子治疗的连续单侧脑膜中动脉栓塞。我们计算了总辐射剂量、每次血管造影的辐射量、总辐射量和每次造影的辐射量。对患者体重指数(BMI)、血管造影次数和导管血管数量进行了多变量对数线性回归:对20例连续的单侧脑膜中动脉栓塞进行了回顾性分析。减少辐射方案使总辐射剂量减少了 39.2%,每次运行的辐射剂量减少了 37.1%。该方案使总辐射量减少了41.6%,每次运行的辐射量减少了39.5%:结论:减少辐射方案可在不增加整体透视时间的情况下轻松应用于神经内血管介入治疗,并可将辐射剂量和辐射量分别减少 39.2% 和 41.6%。我们强烈建议所有介入医师在进行常规介入时注意脉搏率和帧频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Picket fence" an alternative clipping technique for wide necked and large aneurysms: technical nuances in a case series. The natural history of cerebral infundibula: A retrospective cohort study. Safety and effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Multiple AVM with separate nidi, a case report and review the literatures. Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087" inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1