Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer.

Snigdha Jain, Jessica B Long, Vinay Rao, Anica C Law, Allan J Walkey, Elizabeth Prsic, Peter K Lindenauer, Harlan M Krumholz, Cary P Gross
{"title":"Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer.","authors":"Snigdha Jain, Jessica B Long, Vinay Rao, Anica C Law, Allan J Walkey, Elizabeth Prsic, Peter K Lindenauer, Harlan M Krumholz, Cary P Gross","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used SEER-Medicare data (2003-2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004-2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-intensity end-of-life (EOL) care, marked by admission to intensive care units (ICUs) or in-hospital death, can be costly and burdensome. Recent trends in use of ICUs, life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during EOL hospitalizations among older adults with advanced cancer and patterns of in-hospital death are unknown.

Methods: We used SEER-Medicare data (2003-2017) to identify beneficiaries with advanced solid cancer (summary stage 7) who died within 3 years of diagnosis. We identified EOL hospitalizations (within 30 days of death), classifying them by increasing intensity of care into: (1) without ICU; (2) with ICU but without LST (invasive mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, acute dialysis) or NIV; (3) with ICU and NIV but without LST; and (4) with ICU and LST use. We constructed a multinomial regression model to evaluate trends in risk-adjusted hospitalization, overall and across hospitalization categories, adjusting for sociodemographics, cancer characteristics, comorbidities, and frailty. We evaluated trends in in-hospital death across categories.

Results: Of 226,263 Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer, 138,305 (61.1%) were hospitalized at EOL [Age, Mean (SD):77.9(7.1) years; 45.5% female]. Overall, EOL hospitalizations remained high throughout, from 78.1% (95% CI: 77.4, 78.7) in 2004 to 75.5% (95% CI: 74.5, 76.2) in 2017. Hospitalizations without ICU use decreased from 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) to 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9) while hospitalizations with more intensive care increased, from 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) to 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5) for ICU without LST or NIV, 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) to 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1) for ICU with NIV but without LST, and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) to 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5) for ICU with LST use. Among those who experienced in-hospital death, the proportion receiving ICU care increased from 46.5% to 65.0%.

Conclusions: Among older adults with advanced cancer, EOL hospitalization rates remained stable from 2004-2017. However, intensity of care during EOL hospitalizations increased as evidenced by increasing use of ICUs, LSTs, and NIV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症晚期老年人在临终住院期间使用重症监护的趋势。
背景:以入住重症监护病房(ICU)或院内死亡为标志的高强度生命末期(EOL)护理可能成本高昂且负担沉重。晚期癌症老年人在生命末期住院期间使用重症监护病房、维持生命治疗(LST)和无创通气(NIV)的最新趋势以及院内死亡的模式尚不清楚:我们利用 SEER-Medicare 数据(2003-2017 年)确定了确诊后 3 年内死亡的晚期实体癌(总结性 7 期)受益人。我们确定了临终前(死亡后 30 天内)的住院情况,并根据护理强度的增加将其分为:(1) 无 ICU;(2) 有 ICU,但无 LST(侵入性机械通气、气管切开术、胃造瘘术、急性透析)或 NIV;(3) 有 ICU 和 NIV,但无 LST;(4) 有 ICU 和 LST。我们构建了一个多叉回归模型,以评估风险调整后住院治疗的趋势,包括总体趋势和不同住院类别的趋势,并对社会人口统计学、癌症特征、合并症和虚弱进行了调整。我们还评估了不同住院类别的院内死亡趋势:在 226,263 名晚期癌症医保受益人中,138,305 人(61.1%)在临终前住院[年龄,平均(标清):77.9(7.1) 岁;45.5% 为女性]。总体而言,临终前住院率一直居高不下,从2004年的78.1%(95% CI:77.4,78.7)降至2017年的75.5%(95% CI:74.5,76.2)。未使用重症监护室的住院率从 49.3% (95% CI: 48.5, 50.2) 下降到 35.0% (95% CI: 34.2, 35.9),而使用更多重症监护的住院率则从 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) 上升到 28.没有使用 LST 或 NIV 的重症监护病房的住院率从 23.7% (95% CI: 23.0, 24.4) 增加到 28.7% (95% CI: 27.9, 29.5),使用 NIV 但没有使用 LST 的重症监护病房的住院率从 0.8% (95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) 增加到 3.8% (95% CI: 3.4, 4.1),使用 LST 的重症监护病房的住院率从 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0, 4.7) 增加到 8.0% (95% CI: 7.5, 8.5)。在出现院内死亡的患者中,接受重症监护室治疗的比例从46.5%上升至65.0%:在患有晚期癌症的老年人中,2004-2017年的临终住院率保持稳定。但是,临终住院期间的护理强度有所增加,这体现在重症监护室、LST 和 NIV 的使用率不断增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Caring for dementia caregivers: How well does social risk screening reflect unmet needs? End-of-life emergency department use and healthcare expenditures among older adults: A nationally representative study. Antipsychotics for nursing home residents with dementia: Chemical restraints or essential therapeutic intervention? Identifying and quantifying potentially problematic prescribing cascades in clinical practice: A mixed-methods study. Clinical momentum in the care of older adults with advanced dementia: What evidence is there in the medical record?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1