Clinical Outcomes of Dental Implant Fractures: A Case Series and Analysis of Influencing Factors.

Zhen Li, M M Yun Yang, Mbbs Meng Yang, M M Xin Tong
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Dental Implant Fractures: A Case Series and Analysis of Influencing Factors.","authors":"Zhen Li, M M Yun Yang, Mbbs Meng Yang, M M Xin Tong","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To observe and analyse patients with dental implant fracture and explore the factors influencing the fracture with the aim of providing reference for physicians' clinical work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data of 19 patients with dental implant fracture who visited the Department of Implantology of our hospital between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively observed and analysed, and the fracture's influencing factors (e.g. the fracted implant site, implant diameter and connection mode, upper prosthetic method and fracture site) were analysed and investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fractured implants comprised 12 Straumann implants (5 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 7 atop the central screws), 5 Bego implants (4 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 1 atop the central screw), 3 Lifecore implants fractured atop the central screws and 1 Anthogyr implant fractured atop the central screw. Of the 19 patients, 6 had anterior dental implant fracture, and 13 had posterior dental implant fracture (21 fractured implants in total). Maxillary anterior dental implant fracture was observed in 6 patients (8 implants), maxillary posterior implant fracture was observed in 3 patients (3 implants), and mandibular posterior dental implant fracture was observed in 10 patients (10 implants).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A good implant system design, appropriate implant diameter and reasonable upper prosthetic method are key to maintaining long-term stability of a dental implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To observe and analyse patients with dental implant fracture and explore the factors influencing the fracture with the aim of providing reference for physicians' clinical work.

Methods: The clinical data of 19 patients with dental implant fracture who visited the Department of Implantology of our hospital between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively observed and analysed, and the fracture's influencing factors (e.g. the fracted implant site, implant diameter and connection mode, upper prosthetic method and fracture site) were analysed and investigated.

Results: The fractured implants comprised 12 Straumann implants (5 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 7 atop the central screws), 5 Bego implants (4 fractured at the smooth dental neck and 1 atop the central screw), 3 Lifecore implants fractured atop the central screws and 1 Anthogyr implant fractured atop the central screw. Of the 19 patients, 6 had anterior dental implant fracture, and 13 had posterior dental implant fracture (21 fractured implants in total). Maxillary anterior dental implant fracture was observed in 6 patients (8 implants), maxillary posterior implant fracture was observed in 3 patients (3 implants), and mandibular posterior dental implant fracture was observed in 10 patients (10 implants).

Conclusions: A good implant system design, appropriate implant diameter and reasonable upper prosthetic method are key to maintaining long-term stability of a dental implant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植牙骨折的临床结果:病例系列及影响因素分析
目的方法:对我院种植科2007年至2019年就诊的19例种植牙骨折患者的临床资料进行回顾性观察分析,探讨骨折的影响因素,旨在为医生的临床工作提供参考:回顾性观察分析2007年至2019年在我院种植科就诊的19例种植牙骨折患者的临床资料,分析研究骨折的影响因素(如种植体骨折部位、种植体直径及连接方式、上部修复方式及骨折部位等):骨折的种植体包括 12 个 Straumann 种植体(5 个在光滑的牙颈部骨折,7 个在中心螺丝上骨折)、5 个 Bego 种植体(4 个在光滑的牙颈部骨折,1 个在中心螺丝上骨折)、3 个在中心螺丝上骨折的 Lifecore 种植体和 1 个在中心螺丝上骨折的 Anthogyr 种植体。在 19 名患者中,6 名患者的前牙种植体断裂,13 名患者的后牙种植体断裂(共有 21 个种植体断裂)。其中上颌前牙种植体断裂 6 例(8 个种植体),上颌后牙种植体断裂 3 例(3 个种植体),下颌后牙种植体断裂 10 例(10 个种植体):结论:良好的种植系统设计、适当的种植体直径和合理的上部修复方法是保持种植牙长期稳定性的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration: L-PRF Bone-Block Vs A Mixture of Autogenous Bone with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. A Split-Mouth RCT Study with 25 Months Follow-Up. Influence of Dental Implant Diameters on Prosthesis Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Qualitative Analysis of Implant-Bone Interface After Implant Placement Implementing Condensation Technique In Vitro. Thermal Changes During Digital Guided Implant Surgery Using the Conventional and Single Drill Protocols. Effect of Primary Stability on Short vs. Conventional -Implants with Reverse Concave Neck.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1