{"title":"Utilizing a multisystemic model of resilience to synthesize research in youth with inflammatory bowel disease: a narrative review.","authors":"Barbara Storch, Laura C Reigada","doi":"10.21037/tgh-24-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The study of resilience in youth with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is in early stages. The current review aims to illustrate how the use of a multisystemic framework may serve as a developmental and disease-appropriate framework for conceptualizing and designing resilience research for youth with IBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a narrative review; therefore, a comprehensive and systematic literature search was not conducted. Rather, the current paper aims to map selected existing literature to a multisystemic model as exemplars of how the model may be used in youth with IBD. Relevant literature was reviewed, synthesized, and mapped onto the proposed multi-systemic framework.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>The current review considers existing literature across three proposed dimensions of resilience: contexts of risk exposure, protective and promotive factors/processes, and desired outcomes. Review of each dimension includes consideration of selected existing literature to explain what is known about each dimension currently, as well as to propose additional potential future areas to broaden understanding. Specific key takeaways include: (I) understanding risk exposure in young people with IBD requires consideration of disease-specific, demographic, and sociocultural factors; (II) protective and promotive factors and processes for these young people span individual, familial, peer, school, and community levels; and (III) desired outcomes encompass both the absence of negative and the presence of positive indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multisystemic approach to the study of resilience in young people with IBD may not only clarify current gaps in the field, but also allow for additional future considerations to best understand how and for whom outcomes characterized as resilient may occur in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94362,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":"9 ","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-24-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: The study of resilience in youth with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is in early stages. The current review aims to illustrate how the use of a multisystemic framework may serve as a developmental and disease-appropriate framework for conceptualizing and designing resilience research for youth with IBD.
Methods: This is a narrative review; therefore, a comprehensive and systematic literature search was not conducted. Rather, the current paper aims to map selected existing literature to a multisystemic model as exemplars of how the model may be used in youth with IBD. Relevant literature was reviewed, synthesized, and mapped onto the proposed multi-systemic framework.
Key content and findings: The current review considers existing literature across three proposed dimensions of resilience: contexts of risk exposure, protective and promotive factors/processes, and desired outcomes. Review of each dimension includes consideration of selected existing literature to explain what is known about each dimension currently, as well as to propose additional potential future areas to broaden understanding. Specific key takeaways include: (I) understanding risk exposure in young people with IBD requires consideration of disease-specific, demographic, and sociocultural factors; (II) protective and promotive factors and processes for these young people span individual, familial, peer, school, and community levels; and (III) desired outcomes encompass both the absence of negative and the presence of positive indicators.
Conclusions: A multisystemic approach to the study of resilience in young people with IBD may not only clarify current gaps in the field, but also allow for additional future considerations to best understand how and for whom outcomes characterized as resilient may occur in this population.