Paul G. Bulger, Michael T. Jones, J. Gair Ford, Kate Schrier, Kevin P. Cole, Frank Bernardoni, Olivier Dirat, Qunying Zhang, Osama Chahrour, Joy Miller, Llorente Bonaga, Andrew T. Parsons, Lan Yang
{"title":"Risk Assessment and Control of N-Nitrosamines in Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Current Industry Practices","authors":"Paul G. Bulger, Michael T. Jones, J. Gair Ford, Kate Schrier, Kevin P. Cole, Frank Bernardoni, Olivier Dirat, Qunying Zhang, Osama Chahrour, Joy Miller, Llorente Bonaga, Andrew T. Parsons, Lan Yang","doi":"10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and <i>N</i>-nitrosamines are two topics that have seen a surge of interest in recent years. ADCs are increasingly prevalent as oncology therapeutics in clinical development and on the market. Concerns about the potential presence of <i>N</i>-nitrosamines in pharmaceutical products have led to increased regulatory scrutiny and implementation of robust control strategies by the industry. This article, the first in a two-part series, provides visibility into current industry practices for risk assessment and control of <i>N</i>-nitrosamines in ADCs with results and analysis from a benchmarking survey of member companies of the IQ Consortium. Items covered include assessment methodology, identification and characterization of risks, control limits at the drug-linker intermediate and drug substance, and specific factors related to the ADC modality that can be considered. Simpler <i>N</i>-nitrosamines (e.g., NDMA) and more complex <i>N</i>-nitrosamine drug-linker-related impurities (NDLRIs) are discussed. Areas where there are greater or lesser degrees of consistency across companies are highlighted. The second paper builds on these survey results by presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations for the risk evaluation and control strategy of <i>N</i>-nitrosamine impurities in drug-linkers and ADCs. Taken together, these papers provide a perspective on the current state and encourage further development of scientifically sound approaches in this field.","PeriodicalId":55,"journal":{"name":"Organic Process Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Process Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.4c00254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) and N-nitrosamines are two topics that have seen a surge of interest in recent years. ADCs are increasingly prevalent as oncology therapeutics in clinical development and on the market. Concerns about the potential presence of N-nitrosamines in pharmaceutical products have led to increased regulatory scrutiny and implementation of robust control strategies by the industry. This article, the first in a two-part series, provides visibility into current industry practices for risk assessment and control of N-nitrosamines in ADCs with results and analysis from a benchmarking survey of member companies of the IQ Consortium. Items covered include assessment methodology, identification and characterization of risks, control limits at the drug-linker intermediate and drug substance, and specific factors related to the ADC modality that can be considered. Simpler N-nitrosamines (e.g., NDMA) and more complex N-nitrosamine drug-linker-related impurities (NDLRIs) are discussed. Areas where there are greater or lesser degrees of consistency across companies are highlighted. The second paper builds on these survey results by presenting a comprehensive set of recommendations for the risk evaluation and control strategy of N-nitrosamine impurities in drug-linkers and ADCs. Taken together, these papers provide a perspective on the current state and encourage further development of scientifically sound approaches in this field.
期刊介绍:
The journal Organic Process Research & Development serves as a communication tool between industrial chemists and chemists working in universities and research institutes. As such, it reports original work from the broad field of industrial process chemistry but also presents academic results that are relevant, or potentially relevant, to industrial applications. Process chemistry is the science that enables the safe, environmentally benign and ultimately economical manufacturing of organic compounds that are required in larger amounts to help address the needs of society. Consequently, the Journal encompasses every aspect of organic chemistry, including all aspects of catalysis, synthetic methodology development and synthetic strategy exploration, but also includes aspects from analytical and solid-state chemistry and chemical engineering, such as work-up tools,process safety, or flow-chemistry. The goal of development and optimization of chemical reactions and processes is their transfer to a larger scale; original work describing such studies and the actual implementation on scale is highly relevant to the journal. However, studies on new developments from either industry, research institutes or academia that have not yet been demonstrated on scale, but where an industrial utility can be expected and where the study has addressed important prerequisites for a scale-up and has given confidence into the reliability and practicality of the chemistry, also serve the mission of OPR&D as a communication tool between the different contributors to the field.