Oculomotor Behaviour in Individuals with Long COVID-19.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1177/02692155241265886
L González-Vides, J L Hernández-Verdejo, J A Gómez-Pedrero, A Ruiz-Pomeda, P Cañadas-Suárez
{"title":"Oculomotor Behaviour in Individuals with Long COVID-19.","authors":"L González-Vides, J L Hernández-Verdejo, J A Gómez-Pedrero, A Ruiz-Pomeda, P Cañadas-Suárez","doi":"10.1177/02692155241265886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Spanish Association of Persistent COVID.</p><p><strong>Participant: </strong>Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (<i>p</i> < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (<i>p</i> = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (<i>p</i> < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (<i>p</i> = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (<i>p</i> = .0034), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1372-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241265886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour.

Design: A case-control study.

Setting: Spanish Association of Persistent COVID.

Participant: Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13).

Intervention: An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants.

Main measures: The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations.

Results: In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (p < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (p < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (p = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (p < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (p = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (p = .0034), respectively.

Conclusions: Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长 COVID-19 患者的眼球运动行为。
目的:确定长 COVID-19 对眼球运动行为的影响:确定长COVID-19对眼球运动行为的影响:病例对照研究:西班牙持久性 COVID 协会:参与者:75 名病例(64 名女性,11 名男性,平均年龄为 46.4 岁 ±8.9 岁)和 42 名对照组(22 名女性,20 名男性,平均年龄为 53.5 岁 ±13.13 岁):干预措施:采用基于视觉搜索范式的眼动跟踪测试和成人发育眼动测试对参与者进行评估:成人发育眼动测试的主要结果是水平阅读时间、垂直阅读时间及其比率。眼动追踪测试的主要结果是找到目标的时间、持续时间和眼球固定的次数:结果:病例和对照组的眼动测试结果分别为水平(Hadj)阅读时间(74.2 ± 22.7 秒) vs 52.0 ± 6.1 秒(p p = .0032);眼球跟踪测试结果分别为固定次数(11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57)(p p = .0013)和找到目标时间(24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4)(p = .0034):数据显示,与健康人相比,长 COVID-19 患者的眼球运动能力较低。这并不能确定是眼部肌肉功能障碍;行为差异可能与这些人的认知改变有关。所使用的两种测试都可以作为对这些参与者进行临床评估的有用工具。还需要进一步的研究来探讨这些程序的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review. Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training with physical therapy for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic factors of pain, disability, and poor outcomes in persons with neck pain - an umbrella review. Working towards consensus on the assessment of mood after severe acquired brain injury: Focus groups with UK-based professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1