Examining aid fragmentation and collaboration opportunities in Cambodia's health sector.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Globalization and Health Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1186/s12992-024-01063-7
Suyeon Lee, Eunice Y Park
{"title":"Examining aid fragmentation and collaboration opportunities in Cambodia's health sector.","authors":"Suyeon Lee, Eunice Y Park","doi":"10.1186/s12992-024-01063-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cambodia's health sector faces significant challenges exacerbated by aid fragmentation, where development aid is dispersed among numerous small, uncoordinated projects. This study examines the distribution of health sector aid among Cambodia's principal donors to identify priorities, overlaps, and potential collaboration opportunities, addressing the urgent need for aid efficiency and alignment with national health priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing OECD datasets and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for the years 2010-2021, this study quantifies aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector. It analyzes aid allocations from the top five donors-United States, Australia, South Korea, Japan, and Germany-across various health projects and initiatives, evaluating the extent of fragmentation and identifying areas for potential donor collaboration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study's findings highlight a pervasive issue of aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector, evident through the sector's low HHI score. This indicates a widespread distribution of aid across numerous small-scale initiatives, rather than targeted, unified efforts. A notable example includes Japan and Korea, which exhibit lower HHI scores, indicating a more pronounced fragmentation in their aid allocation. These countries' contributions are spread across various sectors without a dominant focus, contrasting with the United States' significant dedication to infectious disease control. However, beyond this specific area, the US's aid distribution across other priority health areas shows signs of fragmentation. This scattered approach to aid allocation, even amidst instances of focused support, illustrates the overarching challenge of aligning donor contributions with the holistic needs of Cambodia's health infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation highlights the critical need for enhanced collaboration and strategic harmonization among international donors to mitigate aid fragmentation in Cambodia's health sector. It underscores the importance of adopting integrated and priority-aligned aid strategies to improve the efficiency and impact of health aid. By fostering synergistic partnerships and harmonizing donor efforts, there is a potential to create a more cohesive support framework that resonates with Cambodia's comprehensive health requirements and contributes to sustainable health outcomes. Such harmonization not only aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 3 by optimizing health services and outcomes but also strengthens global partnerships under Sustainable Development Goal 17, fostering a unified approach to international development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11297730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01063-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cambodia's health sector faces significant challenges exacerbated by aid fragmentation, where development aid is dispersed among numerous small, uncoordinated projects. This study examines the distribution of health sector aid among Cambodia's principal donors to identify priorities, overlaps, and potential collaboration opportunities, addressing the urgent need for aid efficiency and alignment with national health priorities.

Methods: Utilizing OECD datasets and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for the years 2010-2021, this study quantifies aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector. It analyzes aid allocations from the top five donors-United States, Australia, South Korea, Japan, and Germany-across various health projects and initiatives, evaluating the extent of fragmentation and identifying areas for potential donor collaboration.

Results: This study's findings highlight a pervasive issue of aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector, evident through the sector's low HHI score. This indicates a widespread distribution of aid across numerous small-scale initiatives, rather than targeted, unified efforts. A notable example includes Japan and Korea, which exhibit lower HHI scores, indicating a more pronounced fragmentation in their aid allocation. These countries' contributions are spread across various sectors without a dominant focus, contrasting with the United States' significant dedication to infectious disease control. However, beyond this specific area, the US's aid distribution across other priority health areas shows signs of fragmentation. This scattered approach to aid allocation, even amidst instances of focused support, illustrates the overarching challenge of aligning donor contributions with the holistic needs of Cambodia's health infrastructure.

Conclusions: This investigation highlights the critical need for enhanced collaboration and strategic harmonization among international donors to mitigate aid fragmentation in Cambodia's health sector. It underscores the importance of adopting integrated and priority-aligned aid strategies to improve the efficiency and impact of health aid. By fostering synergistic partnerships and harmonizing donor efforts, there is a potential to create a more cohesive support framework that resonates with Cambodia's comprehensive health requirements and contributes to sustainable health outcomes. Such harmonization not only aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 3 by optimizing health services and outcomes but also strengthens global partnerships under Sustainable Development Goal 17, fostering a unified approach to international development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究柬埔寨卫生部门的援助分散与合作机会。
背景:柬埔寨的卫生部门面临着巨大的挑战,援助分散加剧了这一挑战,发展援助被分散在众多小型、不协调的项目中。本研究探讨了柬埔寨卫生部门援助在主要捐助方之间的分配情况,以确定优先事项、重叠之处和潜在的合作机会,从而满足提高援助效率和与国家卫生优先事项保持一致的迫切需要:本研究利用经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的数据集和 2010-2021 年的赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI),量化了柬埔寨卫生部门的援助分散情况。研究分析了五大捐助国--美国、澳大利亚、韩国、日本和德国--在各种卫生项目和倡议中的援助分配情况,评估了援助分散的程度,并确定了潜在的捐助合作领域:本研究的结果突出表明,柬埔寨卫生部门普遍存在援助分散的问题,该部门的 HHI 分数较低就是明证。这表明,援助广泛分布于众多小规模项目中,而不是有针对性的统一行动。一个明显的例子是日本和韩国,这两个国家的 HHI 分数较低,表明其援助分配更加分散。这些国家的援助分散在各个部门,没有一个主导重点,这与美国在传染病控制方面的巨大投入形成了鲜明对比。然而,除这一特定领域外,美国在其他优先卫生领域的援助分配也显示出分散的迹象。这种分散的援助分配方式,即使是在重点支持的情况下,也说明了如何使捐助方的捐款与柬埔寨卫生基础设施的整体需求相一致这一重大挑战:这项调查突出表明,国际捐助方之间亟需加强合作和战略协调,以缓解柬埔寨卫生部门援助分散的问题。它强调了采取综合的、与优先事项相一致的援助战略以提高卫生援助的效率和影响的重要性。通过促进协同伙伴关系和协调捐助者的努力,有可能建立一个更有凝聚力的支持框架,与柬埔寨的全面卫生要求产生共鸣,并有助于取得可持续的卫生成果。这种协调不仅能通过优化保健服务和成果与可持续发展目标 3 保持一致,还能加强可持续发展目标 17 下的全球伙伴关系,促进对国际发展采取统一的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
期刊最新文献
The adoption of international travel measures during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis. Capturing sources of health system legitimacy in fragmented conflict zones under different governance models: a case study of northwest Syria. Protecting whose welfare? A document analysis of competition regulatory decisions in four jurisdictions across three harmful consumer product industries. Assessing the health status of migrants upon arrival in Europe: a systematic review of the adverse impact of migration journeys. How can advocates leverage power to advance comprehensive regulation on ultra-processed foods? learning from advocate experience in Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1