Impact on Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Layer Detector Spectral CT for Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: Comparison With Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001640
Li Ding, Xiaomei Li, Jie Lin, Shuting Deng, Mingwang Chen, Weiwei Deng, Yikai Xu, Zhao Chen, Chenggong Yan
{"title":"Impact on Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Layer Detector Spectral CT for Pulmonary Subsolid Nodules: Comparison With Hybrid and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction.","authors":"Li Ding, Xiaomei Li, Jie Lin, Shuting Deng, Mingwang Chen, Weiwei Deng, Yikai Xu, Zhao Chen, Chenggong Yan","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of pulmonary subsolid nodules on conventional iterative algorithms, virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), and electron density mapping (EDM) using a dual-layer detector spectral CT (DLSCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study recruited 270 patients who underwent DLSCT scan for lung nodule screening or follow-up. All CT examinations with subsolid nodules (pure ground-glass nodules [GGNs] or part-solid nodules) were reconstructed with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction, VMI at 40, 70, 100, and 130 keV levels, and EDM. The CT number, objective image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, diameter, and volume of subsolid nodules were measured for quantitative analysis. The overall image quality, image noise, visualization of nodules, artifact, and sharpness were subjectively rated by 2 thoracic radiologists on a 5-point scale (1 = unacceptable, 5 = excellent) in consensus. The objective image quality measurements, diameter, and volume were compared among the 7 groups with a repeated 1-way analysis of variance. The subjective scores were compared with Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 subsolid nodules, including 179 pure GGNs, and 19 part-solid nodules were identified. Based on the objective analysis, EDM had the highest signal-to-noise ratio (164.71 ± 133.60; P < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (227.97 ± 161.96; P < 0.001) among all image sets. Furthermore, EDM had a superior mean subjective rating score (4.80 ± 0.42) for visualization of GGNs compared to other reconstructed images (all P < 0.001), although the model-based iterative reconstruction had superior subjective scores of overall image quality. For pure GGNs, the measured diameter and volume did not significantly differ among different reconstructions (both P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EDM derived from DLSCT enabled improved image quality and lesion conspicuity for the evaluation of lung subsolid nodules compared to conventional iterative reconstruction algorithms and VMIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of pulmonary subsolid nodules on conventional iterative algorithms, virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), and electron density mapping (EDM) using a dual-layer detector spectral CT (DLSCT).

Methods: This retrospective study recruited 270 patients who underwent DLSCT scan for lung nodule screening or follow-up. All CT examinations with subsolid nodules (pure ground-glass nodules [GGNs] or part-solid nodules) were reconstructed with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction, VMI at 40, 70, 100, and 130 keV levels, and EDM. The CT number, objective image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, diameter, and volume of subsolid nodules were measured for quantitative analysis. The overall image quality, image noise, visualization of nodules, artifact, and sharpness were subjectively rated by 2 thoracic radiologists on a 5-point scale (1 = unacceptable, 5 = excellent) in consensus. The objective image quality measurements, diameter, and volume were compared among the 7 groups with a repeated 1-way analysis of variance. The subjective scores were compared with Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: A total of 198 subsolid nodules, including 179 pure GGNs, and 19 part-solid nodules were identified. Based on the objective analysis, EDM had the highest signal-to-noise ratio (164.71 ± 133.60; P < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratio (227.97 ± 161.96; P < 0.001) among all image sets. Furthermore, EDM had a superior mean subjective rating score (4.80 ± 0.42) for visualization of GGNs compared to other reconstructed images (all P < 0.001), although the model-based iterative reconstruction had superior subjective scores of overall image quality. For pure GGNs, the measured diameter and volume did not significantly differ among different reconstructions (both P > 0.05).

Conclusions: EDM derived from DLSCT enabled improved image quality and lesion conspicuity for the evaluation of lung subsolid nodules compared to conventional iterative reconstruction algorithms and VMIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双层探测器光谱 CT 对肺实性下结节图像质量和诊断性能的影响:与混合重建和基于模型的迭代重建的比较。
目的评估使用双层探测器光谱 CT(DLSCT)的传统迭代算法、虚拟单能图像(VMI)和电子密度绘图(EDM)对肺实性下结节的图像质量和诊断性能:这项回顾性研究招募了 270 名接受 DLSCT 扫描的肺结节筛查或随访患者。所有带有亚实性结节(纯磨玻璃结节 [GGNs] 或部分实性结节)的 CT 检查均采用混合和基于模型的迭代重建、40、70、100 和 130 keV 水平的 VMI 以及 EDM 进行重建。测量 CT 数量、客观图像噪声、信噪比、对比噪声比、直径和实性下结节的体积,并进行定量分析。总体图像质量、图像噪声、结节可视度、伪影和清晰度由两名胸部放射科医生以 5 分制(1 = 不可接受,5 = 优秀)进行主观评分,并达成共识。7 组患者的客观图像质量测量值、直径和体积采用重复单因素方差分析进行比较。主观评分采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行比较:结果:共发现 198 个实性下结节,包括 179 个纯 GGN 和 19 个部分实性结节。根据客观分析,在所有图像组中,EDM 的信噪比(164.71 ± 133.60;P < 0.001)和对比度与信噪比(227.97 ± 161.96;P < 0.001)最高。此外,与其他重建图像相比,EDM 在 GGN 可视化方面的平均主观评分(4.80 ± 0.42)更高(均为 P <0.001),尽管基于模型的迭代重建在整体图像质量方面的主观评分更高。对于纯GGNs,不同重建的测量直径和体积没有显著差异(均为P > 0.05):结论:与传统的迭代重建算法和 VMI 相比,DLSCT 导出的 EDM 在评估肺实性下结节时可提高图像质量和病灶的清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging Combined With Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen for Grading Cervical cancer. Evaluating the Efficacy of Deep Learning Reconstruction in Reducing Radiation Dose for Computer-Aided Volumetry for Liver Tumor: A Phantom Study. Improving Image Quality and Visualization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Arterial Phase Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement-Boost Technique. Phosphaturic Mesenchymal Tumor and Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia: A Report of 5 Cases, Including 2 Skull Base Cases With Arterial Spin Label Perfusion. Application of a Deep Learning-Based Contrast-Boosting Algorithm to Low-Dose Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography With Reduced Iodine Load.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1