Influence of facetectomy, cross-link augmentation, and interbody procedure on progression of bone fusion in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the long cortical bone trajectory technique.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-08-02 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231366
Keitaro Matsukawa, Takashi Kato, Yoshihide Yanai, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi, Yoshiyuki Yato
{"title":"Influence of facetectomy, cross-link augmentation, and interbody procedure on progression of bone fusion in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the long cortical bone trajectory technique.","authors":"Keitaro Matsukawa, Takashi Kato, Yoshihide Yanai, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi, Yoshiyuki Yato","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>When using the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique, two technical countermeasures are recommended to promote bone fusion: taking a long CBT screw path directed more anteriorly and improving the stability of the spinal construct by facet joint preservation, cross-link augmentation, and rigid anterior interbody reconstruction. However, there has been no report on how these surgical procedures, which are heavily dependent on the surgeon's preference, contribute to successful bone fusion. The aim of the present study was to investigate the progression of lumbar spinal fusion using the long CBT technique and identify factors contributing to the time taken to achieve bone fusion, with a particular focus on the involvement of surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 167 consecutive patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 using the long CBT technique were included (mean follow-up 42.8 months). Bone fusion was assessed to identify factors contributing to the time to achieve bone fusion. Investigated factors were 1) age, 2) sex, 3) BMI, 4) bone mineral density, 5) intervertebral mobility, 6) screw depth in the vertebra, 7) extent of facetectomy, 8) cross-link augmentation, 9) cage material, 10) cage design, 11) number of cages, and 12) contact area of cages with the vertebral endplate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bone fusion rate was 89.2% at 2 years postoperatively and 95.8% at the last follow-up, with a mean period to bone fusion of 16.6 ± 9.6 months. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age (standardized regression coefficient [β] = 0.25, p = 0.002), female sex (β = -0.22, p = 0.004), and BMI (β = 0.15, p = 0.045) were significant independent factors affecting the time to achieve bone fusion. There was no significant effect of surgical procedures (p ≥ 0.364).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to investigate the progression of lumbar spinal fusion using the long CBT technique and identify factors contributing to the time taken to achieve bone fusion. Patient factors such as age, sex, and BMI affected the progression of bone fusion, and surgical factors had only weak effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"483-488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.SPINE231366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: When using the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technique, two technical countermeasures are recommended to promote bone fusion: taking a long CBT screw path directed more anteriorly and improving the stability of the spinal construct by facet joint preservation, cross-link augmentation, and rigid anterior interbody reconstruction. However, there has been no report on how these surgical procedures, which are heavily dependent on the surgeon's preference, contribute to successful bone fusion. The aim of the present study was to investigate the progression of lumbar spinal fusion using the long CBT technique and identify factors contributing to the time taken to achieve bone fusion, with a particular focus on the involvement of surgical procedures.

Methods: A total of 167 consecutive patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5 using the long CBT technique were included (mean follow-up 42.8 months). Bone fusion was assessed to identify factors contributing to the time to achieve bone fusion. Investigated factors were 1) age, 2) sex, 3) BMI, 4) bone mineral density, 5) intervertebral mobility, 6) screw depth in the vertebra, 7) extent of facetectomy, 8) cross-link augmentation, 9) cage material, 10) cage design, 11) number of cages, and 12) contact area of cages with the vertebral endplate.

Results: The bone fusion rate was 89.2% at 2 years postoperatively and 95.8% at the last follow-up, with a mean period to bone fusion of 16.6 ± 9.6 months. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age (standardized regression coefficient [β] = 0.25, p = 0.002), female sex (β = -0.22, p = 0.004), and BMI (β = 0.15, p = 0.045) were significant independent factors affecting the time to achieve bone fusion. There was no significant effect of surgical procedures (p ≥ 0.364).

Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the progression of lumbar spinal fusion using the long CBT technique and identify factors contributing to the time taken to achieve bone fusion. Patient factors such as age, sex, and BMI affected the progression of bone fusion, and surgical factors had only weak effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用长皮质骨轨迹技术进行单层后路腰椎椎体间融合术时,面骨切除术、交叉连接增强术和椎体间手术对骨融合进展的影响。
目的:在使用皮质骨轨迹(CBT)技术时,建议采取两种技术对策来促进骨融合:采取更靠前的长CBT螺钉路径,以及通过保留面关节、交叉连接增强和刚性前椎间重建来提高脊柱结构的稳定性。然而,这些手术方法在很大程度上取决于外科医生的偏好,目前还没有关于这些手术方法如何促进骨融合成功的报道。本研究的目的是调查使用长 CBT 技术进行腰椎融合术的进展情况,并确定导致实现骨融合所需时间的因素,尤其关注手术程序的参与情况:共纳入了167例连续接受长CBT技术L4-5单层后路腰椎椎间融合术的L4退行性脊椎滑脱症患者(平均随访42.8个月)。对骨融合进行了评估,以确定影响骨融合时间的因素。调查因素包括:1)年龄;2)性别;3)体重指数;4)骨矿物质密度;5)椎体间活动度;6)螺钉在椎体内的深度;7)面神经切除范围;8)交联增强;9)保持架材料;10)保持架设计;11)保持架数量;12)保持架与椎体终板的接触面积:术后两年的骨融合率为 89.2%,最后一次随访的骨融合率为 95.8%,平均骨融合时间为 16.6 ± 9.6 个月。多变量回归分析显示,年龄(标准化回归系数 [β] = 0.25,p = 0.002)、女性性别(β = -0.22,p = 0.004)和体重指数(β = 0.15,p = 0.045)是影响骨融合时间的重要独立因素。手术方法无明显影响(p ≥ 0.364):这是首次研究使用长CBT技术对腰椎融合术的进展进行调查,并确定影响骨融合时间的因素。年龄、性别和体重指数等患者因素会影响骨融合的进展,而手术因素的影响较弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
A propensity score-matched comparison between single-stage and multistage anterior/posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study. Return to play in professional football players following traumatic cervical spine injury: expert opinions from the National Football League spine surgeons. Assessing the prognostic impact of body composition phenotypes on surgical outcomes and survival in patients with spinal metastasis: a deep learning approach to preoperative CT analysis. Presentation, management, and outcome of traumatic spine injuries in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Opioid prescribing guidelines for spine surgery patients: a multisite analysis of guideline implementation and monitoring with an automated text messaging platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1