Outcomes of pediatric-focused advanced practice provider fellowship programs: An integrative review.

Rajashree Koppolu, Brigit Van Graafeiland, Bryan R Hansen
{"title":"Outcomes of pediatric-focused advanced practice provider fellowship programs: An integrative review.","authors":"Rajashree Koppolu, Brigit Van Graafeiland, Bryan R Hansen","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increased demand for pediatric-focused advanced practice providers (APPs) exists to address the health care needs of children with medical complexity. Postlicensure advanced practice fellowship programs have been developed to help improve novice provider transition to practice, reducing attrition.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this integrative review are to (1) identify outcome measurements of pediatric-focused advanced practice fellowship programs and (2) evaluate the outcome measures to guide future implications for practice.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic integrative literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched in August and September 2022. Articles met inclusion criteria if they included new graduate APPs, reported the intervention of a pediatric fellowship program, and shared outcome measurements. Studies were excluded if they did not directly report on fellowship program outcome measures. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and were summarized and appraised for quality using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Four themes from the literature included the favorable impact of advanced practice fellowship programs on (a) job satisfaction, (b) retention, (c) clinical and professional performance, and (d) financial outcomes. Variable strategies were used to measure outcomes across programs.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Postlicensure pediatric-focused advanced practice fellowship programs seem to improve retention and job satisfaction, increase provider confidence, and bring a favorable return on investment for the organization. Future work should include investment in developing validated, standardized assessment tools to support future development of these programs in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increased demand for pediatric-focused advanced practice providers (APPs) exists to address the health care needs of children with medical complexity. Postlicensure advanced practice fellowship programs have been developed to help improve novice provider transition to practice, reducing attrition.

Objectives: The objectives of this integrative review are to (1) identify outcome measurements of pediatric-focused advanced practice fellowship programs and (2) evaluate the outcome measures to guide future implications for practice.

Data sources: A systematic integrative literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched in August and September 2022. Articles met inclusion criteria if they included new graduate APPs, reported the intervention of a pediatric fellowship program, and shared outcome measurements. Studies were excluded if they did not directly report on fellowship program outcome measures. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria and were summarized and appraised for quality using the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model.

Conclusions: Four themes from the literature included the favorable impact of advanced practice fellowship programs on (a) job satisfaction, (b) retention, (c) clinical and professional performance, and (d) financial outcomes. Variable strategies were used to measure outcomes across programs.

Implications for practice: Postlicensure pediatric-focused advanced practice fellowship programs seem to improve retention and job satisfaction, increase provider confidence, and bring a favorable return on investment for the organization. Future work should include investment in developing validated, standardized assessment tools to support future development of these programs in the pediatric population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以儿科为重点的高级实习医生奖学金项目的成果:综合评述。
背景:为满足病情复杂的儿童的医疗保健需求,对儿科高级执业医师(APPs)的需求日益增加。已制定了执照后高级实践奖学金计划,以帮助改善新手医疗服务提供者向实践的过渡,减少自然减员:本综合综述的目的是:(1)确定以儿科为重点的高级实践研究金项目的成果衡量标准;(2)评估成果衡量标准,以指导未来的实践意义:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》进行了系统的综合文献综述。在 2022 年 8 月和 9 月对 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase 和 Google Scholar 进行了检索。符合纳入标准的文章包括新毕业的APP,报告了儿科奖学金项目的干预措施,并分享了结果测量。如果研究没有直接报告研究金项目的结果测量,则排除在外。有 13 项研究符合纳入标准,我们采用约翰-霍普金斯大学的循证实践模型对这些研究进行了总结和质量评估:文献中的四个主题包括高级实践奖学金项目对以下方面的有利影响:(a)工作满意度;(b)留用率;(c)临床和专业表现;以及(d)财务结果。在衡量不同项目的成果时采用了不同的策略:实践启示:以儿科为重点的执照后高级实践奖学金项目似乎能提高留用率和工作满意度,增强医疗服务提供者的信心,并为机构带来良好的投资回报。未来的工作应包括投资开发经过验证的标准化评估工具,以支持这些项目在儿科人群中的未来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
The effects of health beliefs and acculturation on the acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccination among Asian Indian parents in the United States. To precept or not to precept: Perspectives from nurse practitioners. The use of an online learning module to improve knowledge for prevention of back pain and injury in industrial workers. Integrating genomics and precision health knowledge into practice: A guide for nurse practitioners. A nurse practitioner-led deprescribing bundled intervention to reduce rates of polypharmacy in the post-acute care setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1