Correlation Among Neighborhood-Level Measures of the Tobacco Retail Environment.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae190
Paul L Delamater, Lily Herbert, Shelley D Golden, Amanda Y Kong
{"title":"Correlation Among Neighborhood-Level Measures of the Tobacco Retail Environment.","authors":"Paul L Delamater, Lily Herbert, Shelley D Golden, Amanda Y Kong","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco retailer density and distance to tobacco retailers are understood to influence tobacco-related behaviors; however, there is no general agreement on how to best characterize or measure the tobacco retail environment (TRE). In this data-driven analysis, we examine similarities among neighborhood-level measures of the TRE and assess how the geographic resolution of the neighborhood units may affect them.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>We used locations of likely tobacco retailers in the United States to calculate multiple retailer count, density, and distance measures. Measures were calculated at the Census block group, tract, and county (including county equivalents) levels of geographic aggregation. Spearman's correlation was used to evaluate the similarity among the TRE measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the block group and tract level, correlation among all TRE measures ranged from slightly negative (ρ = -0.03) to nearly perfect (ρ = 0.99). At both levels of aggregation, distance-based TRE measures were highly correlated (ρ > 0.76). At the block group level, the simple count of retailers was highly correlated with the density measures (ρ > 0.83), and at the tract level, simple count was moderately to highly correlated with the density measures (ρ > 0.5). Findings were generally similar at the county level; a notable deviation was that retailers per person were negatively correlated with all other TRE measures (range from ρ = -0.08 to ρ = -0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some common measures were not correlated, suggesting they capture different aspects of the TRE; similarity among the various measures also varied by level of geographic aggregation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Because the TRE shapes people's tobacco-related behaviors, using appropriate measures to characterize it at a neighborhood level is paramount. Our work highlights both the similarities and differences among a set of common measures, thereby suggesting the measures may be capturing different aspects of the overall retail environment. Our findings regarding geographic level of aggregation underscore the importance of neighborhood definition in any TRE analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco retailer density and distance to tobacco retailers are understood to influence tobacco-related behaviors; however, there is no general agreement on how to best characterize or measure the tobacco retail environment (TRE). In this data-driven analysis, we examine similarities among neighborhood-level measures of the TRE and assess how the geographic resolution of the neighborhood units may affect them.

Aims and methods: We used locations of likely tobacco retailers in the United States to calculate multiple retailer count, density, and distance measures. Measures were calculated at the Census block group, tract, and county (including county equivalents) levels of geographic aggregation. Spearman's correlation was used to evaluate the similarity among the TRE measures.

Results: At the block group and tract level, correlation among all TRE measures ranged from slightly negative (ρ = -0.03) to nearly perfect (ρ = 0.99). At both levels of aggregation, distance-based TRE measures were highly correlated (ρ > 0.76). At the block group level, the simple count of retailers was highly correlated with the density measures (ρ > 0.83), and at the tract level, simple count was moderately to highly correlated with the density measures (ρ > 0.5). Findings were generally similar at the county level; a notable deviation was that retailers per person were negatively correlated with all other TRE measures (range from ρ = -0.08 to ρ = -0.32).

Conclusions: Some common measures were not correlated, suggesting they capture different aspects of the TRE; similarity among the various measures also varied by level of geographic aggregation.

Implications: Because the TRE shapes people's tobacco-related behaviors, using appropriate measures to characterize it at a neighborhood level is paramount. Our work highlights both the similarities and differences among a set of common measures, thereby suggesting the measures may be capturing different aspects of the overall retail environment. Our findings regarding geographic level of aggregation underscore the importance of neighborhood definition in any TRE analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
邻里层面的烟草零售环境衡量标准之间的相关性。
导言:烟草零售商的密度和与烟草零售商的距离被认为会影响烟草相关行为;然而,对于如何最好地描述或测量烟草零售环境(TRE),目前还没有达成普遍共识。在这项数据驱动的分析中,我们研究了邻里层面的烟草零售环境测量值之间的相似性,并评估了邻里单位的地理分辨率可能对其产生的影响:方法:我们利用美国可能的烟草零售商的位置来计算多种零售商数量、密度和距离测量值。这些指标是在人口普查街区组、片区和县(包括县等同物)的地理汇总水平上计算得出的。斯皮尔曼相关性用于评估 TRE 测量之间的相似性:在街区组和片区层面,所有 TRE 指标之间的相关性从轻微负相关(ρ = -0.03)到接近完美相关(ρ = 0.99)不等。在两个聚合水平上,基于距离的 TRE 测量都高度相关(ρ > 0.76)。在街区组层面,零售商的简单计数与密度测量高度相关(ρ > 0.83),而在片区层面,简单计数与密度测量中度到高度相关(ρ > 0.5)。县级层面的研究结果大致相似;一个显著的偏差是人均零售量与所有其他 TRE 测量值呈负相关(范围从 ρ = -0.08 到 ρ = -0.32):结论:一些共同的测量指标并不相关,这表明它们捕捉到了 TRE 的不同方面;各种测量指标之间的相似性也因地理汇总水平而异:启示:由于烟草零售环境影响着人们的烟草相关行为,因此在邻里层面使用适当的测量方法来描述烟草零售环境是至关重要的。我们的研究强调了一系列通用测量指标之间的相似性和差异性,从而表明这些测量指标可能捕捉到了整体零售环境的不同方面。我们在地理聚合层面的研究结果强调了邻里定义在任何烟草零售环境分析中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Reducing Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in the Home: A Qualitative Study With Palestinian-Arab Women in Israel. The Impact of Three Alternate Nicotine-Delivery Products on Combusted Cigarette Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reactions to a Hypothetical Ban of Open-System Electronic Cigarettes Among People Who Currently Use Electronic Cigarettes. Trends in Exclusive Non-Cigarette Tobacco Smoking in England: A Population Survey 2013-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1