Invasive freshwater algae and cyanobacteria are overlooked: insights from a bibliometric study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s10750-024-05655-7
Florencia S. Alvarez Dalinger, Claudia Nidia Borja, Camila Muñoz, Liliana Beatriz Moraña, Verónica Laura Lozano
{"title":"Invasive freshwater algae and cyanobacteria are overlooked: insights from a bibliometric study","authors":"Florencia S. Alvarez Dalinger, Claudia Nidia Borja, Camila Muñoz, Liliana Beatriz Moraña, Verónica Laura Lozano","doi":"10.1007/s10750-024-05655-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological invasions represent a critical global challenge, profoundly impacting ecosystems and driving environmental change. While the distribution of invasive animal or plant species has received considerable attention, our understanding of the global prevalence of invasive algae and cyanobacteria in continental freshwater ecosystems remains limited. With the aim of studying how much freshwater algae and cyanobacteria are being detected as invaders, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. It revealed 72 reported species as invasive, with <i>R. raciborskii</i>, <i>D. geminata</i>, and <i>C. furcoides</i> emerging as principal ones. Only 52% of the reports quantified or analyzed environmental impacts. Among the documented impacts and environmental alterations, changes in phytoplankton structure and diversity were the most frequently reported, followed by toxin production, particularly associated with invasive cyanobacteria species. Geographically, there is a noticeable concentration of reports, with Africa and Asia being underrepresented. Meanwhile, the Czech Republic and Poland emerge as leaders in the number of species classified as invaders. This geographical bias suggests a significant gap in our understanding of the true distribution of invasive freshwater algae and cyanobacteria species.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-024-05655-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological invasions represent a critical global challenge, profoundly impacting ecosystems and driving environmental change. While the distribution of invasive animal or plant species has received considerable attention, our understanding of the global prevalence of invasive algae and cyanobacteria in continental freshwater ecosystems remains limited. With the aim of studying how much freshwater algae and cyanobacteria are being detected as invaders, we conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. It revealed 72 reported species as invasive, with R. raciborskii, D. geminata, and C. furcoides emerging as principal ones. Only 52% of the reports quantified or analyzed environmental impacts. Among the documented impacts and environmental alterations, changes in phytoplankton structure and diversity were the most frequently reported, followed by toxin production, particularly associated with invasive cyanobacteria species. Geographically, there is a noticeable concentration of reports, with Africa and Asia being underrepresented. Meanwhile, the Czech Republic and Poland emerge as leaders in the number of species classified as invaders. This geographical bias suggests a significant gap in our understanding of the true distribution of invasive freshwater algae and cyanobacteria species.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被忽视的入侵淡水藻类和蓝藻:一项文献计量学研究的启示
生物入侵是一项严峻的全球性挑战,它对生态系统产生了深远影响,并推动了环境变化。虽然入侵动物或植物物种的分布已受到广泛关注,但我们对入侵藻类和蓝藻在全球大陆淡水生态系统中的流行情况的了解仍然有限。为了研究有多少淡水藻类和蓝藻被检测为入侵者,我们进行了一次全面的文献计量分析。结果显示,有 72 个物种被报告为入侵物种,其中主要是 R. raciborskii、D. geminata 和 C. furcoides。只有 52% 的报告对环境影响进行了量化或分析。在已记录的影响和环境变化中,浮游植物结构和多样性的变化是最常见的报告,其次是毒素的产生,尤其是与入侵蓝藻物种有关的毒素。从地域上看,报告明显集中在非洲和亚洲。同时,捷克共和国和波兰在被列为入侵物种的数量上遥遥领先。这种地域偏差表明,我们对入侵淡水藻类和蓝藻物种真实分布情况的了解还存在很大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1