{"title":"Outlier detection and selection of representative fluid samples using machine learning: a case study of Iranian oil fields","authors":"Mahdi Hosseini, Seyed Hayan Zaheri, Ali Roosta","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01850-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the development of a field, many fluid samples are taken from wells. Selecting a robust fluid sample as the reservoir representative helps to have a better field characterization, reliable reservoir simulation, valid production forecast, efficient well placement and finally achieving optimized ultimate recovery. First, this paper aims to detect and separate the samples that have been collected under poor conditions or analyzed in a non-standard way. Moreover, it introduces a novel ranking method to score the samples based on the amount of coordination with other fluid samples in the region. The dataset includes 136 fluid samples from five reservoirs in Iranian fields, each of them consisting of 21 key parameters. Five acknowledged machine learning based anomaly detection techniques are implemented to compare fluid samples and detect those whose results deviate from others, indicating non-standard samples. To ensure the proper detection of outlier data, the results are compared with the traditional validation method of gas-oil ratio estimation. All five outlier detection methods demonstrate acceptable performance with average accuracy of 79% compared to traditional validation. Furthermore, the fluid samples with the highest scores in scoring-based algorithms are introduced as the best reservoir’s representative fluid. Finally, fuzzy logic is used to obtain a final score for each sample, taking the results of the six methods as input and ranking the samples based on their output score. The study confirms the robustness of the novel approach for fluid validation using outlier detection techniques and the value of machine learning and fuzzy logic for sample ranking, excelling in considering all critical fluid parameters simultaneously over traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01850-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the development of a field, many fluid samples are taken from wells. Selecting a robust fluid sample as the reservoir representative helps to have a better field characterization, reliable reservoir simulation, valid production forecast, efficient well placement and finally achieving optimized ultimate recovery. First, this paper aims to detect and separate the samples that have been collected under poor conditions or analyzed in a non-standard way. Moreover, it introduces a novel ranking method to score the samples based on the amount of coordination with other fluid samples in the region. The dataset includes 136 fluid samples from five reservoirs in Iranian fields, each of them consisting of 21 key parameters. Five acknowledged machine learning based anomaly detection techniques are implemented to compare fluid samples and detect those whose results deviate from others, indicating non-standard samples. To ensure the proper detection of outlier data, the results are compared with the traditional validation method of gas-oil ratio estimation. All five outlier detection methods demonstrate acceptable performance with average accuracy of 79% compared to traditional validation. Furthermore, the fluid samples with the highest scores in scoring-based algorithms are introduced as the best reservoir’s representative fluid. Finally, fuzzy logic is used to obtain a final score for each sample, taking the results of the six methods as input and ranking the samples based on their output score. The study confirms the robustness of the novel approach for fluid validation using outlier detection techniques and the value of machine learning and fuzzy logic for sample ranking, excelling in considering all critical fluid parameters simultaneously over traditional methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle.
Focusing on:
Reservoir characterization and modeling
Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs
Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface
Geophysics Modeling and Imaging
Geophysics: Interpretation
Geophysics: Processing
Production Engineering
Formation Evaluation
Reservoir Management
Petroleum Geology
Enhanced Recovery
Geomechanics
Drilling
Completions
The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies