Outlier detection and selection of representative fluid samples using machine learning: a case study of Iranian oil fields

IF 2.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s13202-024-01850-3
Mahdi Hosseini, Seyed Hayan Zaheri, Ali Roosta
{"title":"Outlier detection and selection of representative fluid samples using machine learning: a case study of Iranian oil fields","authors":"Mahdi Hosseini, Seyed Hayan Zaheri, Ali Roosta","doi":"10.1007/s13202-024-01850-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the development of a field, many fluid samples are taken from wells. Selecting a robust fluid sample as the reservoir representative helps to have a better field characterization, reliable reservoir simulation, valid production forecast, efficient well placement and finally achieving optimized ultimate recovery. First, this paper aims to detect and separate the samples that have been collected under poor conditions or analyzed in a non-standard way. Moreover, it introduces a novel ranking method to score the samples based on the amount of coordination with other fluid samples in the region. The dataset includes 136 fluid samples from five reservoirs in Iranian fields, each of them consisting of 21 key parameters. Five acknowledged machine learning based anomaly detection techniques are implemented to compare fluid samples and detect those whose results deviate from others, indicating non-standard samples. To ensure the proper detection of outlier data, the results are compared with the traditional validation method of gas-oil ratio estimation. All five outlier detection methods demonstrate acceptable performance with average accuracy of 79% compared to traditional validation. Furthermore, the fluid samples with the highest scores in scoring-based algorithms are introduced as the best reservoir’s representative fluid. Finally, fuzzy logic is used to obtain a final score for each sample, taking the results of the six methods as input and ranking the samples based on their output score. The study confirms the robustness of the novel approach for fluid validation using outlier detection techniques and the value of machine learning and fuzzy logic for sample ranking, excelling in considering all critical fluid parameters simultaneously over traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01850-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the development of a field, many fluid samples are taken from wells. Selecting a robust fluid sample as the reservoir representative helps to have a better field characterization, reliable reservoir simulation, valid production forecast, efficient well placement and finally achieving optimized ultimate recovery. First, this paper aims to detect and separate the samples that have been collected under poor conditions or analyzed in a non-standard way. Moreover, it introduces a novel ranking method to score the samples based on the amount of coordination with other fluid samples in the region. The dataset includes 136 fluid samples from five reservoirs in Iranian fields, each of them consisting of 21 key parameters. Five acknowledged machine learning based anomaly detection techniques are implemented to compare fluid samples and detect those whose results deviate from others, indicating non-standard samples. To ensure the proper detection of outlier data, the results are compared with the traditional validation method of gas-oil ratio estimation. All five outlier detection methods demonstrate acceptable performance with average accuracy of 79% compared to traditional validation. Furthermore, the fluid samples with the highest scores in scoring-based algorithms are introduced as the best reservoir’s representative fluid. Finally, fuzzy logic is used to obtain a final score for each sample, taking the results of the six methods as input and ranking the samples based on their output score. The study confirms the robustness of the novel approach for fluid validation using outlier detection techniques and the value of machine learning and fuzzy logic for sample ranking, excelling in considering all critical fluid parameters simultaneously over traditional methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习检测异常值并选择代表性流体样本:伊朗油田案例研究
在油田开发过程中,要从油井中采集许多流体样本。选择可靠的流体样本作为储层代表,有助于更好地进行油田特征描述、可靠的储层模拟、有效的产量预测、高效的井位安排,并最终实现优化的最终采收率。首先,本文旨在检测和分离在恶劣条件下采集或以非标准方式分析的样本。此外,本文还引入了一种新颖的排序方法,根据样本与区域内其他流体样本的协调程度对样本进行评分。数据集包括来自伊朗油田五个储层的 136 个流体样本,每个样本由 21 个关键参数组成。该数据集采用了五种公认的基于机器学习的异常检测技术来比较流体样本,并检测那些结果与其他样本有偏差的样本,这些样本表明是非标准样本。为确保正确检测异常值数据,将检测结果与传统的气油比估算验证方法进行了比较。与传统验证方法相比,所有五种离群值检测方法都表现出了可接受的性能,平均准确率达到 79%。此外,在基于评分的算法中得分最高的流体样本被引入作为最佳储层代表流体。最后,将六种方法的结果作为输入,并根据输出得分对样本进行排序,利用模糊逻辑为每个样本得出最终得分。研究证实了使用离群点检测技术进行流体验证的新方法的稳健性,以及机器学习和模糊逻辑在样本排序方面的价值,在同时考虑所有关键流体参数方面优于传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is an international open access journal that publishes original and review articles as well as book reviews on leading edge studies in the field of petroleum engineering, petroleum geology and exploration geophysics and the implementation of related technologies to the development and management of oil and gas reservoirs from their discovery through their entire production cycle. Focusing on: Reservoir characterization and modeling Unconventional oil and gas reservoirs Geophysics: Acquisition and near surface Geophysics Modeling and Imaging Geophysics: Interpretation Geophysics: Processing Production Engineering Formation Evaluation Reservoir Management Petroleum Geology Enhanced Recovery Geomechanics Drilling Completions The Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice as detailed here: https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies
期刊最新文献
Maximizing efficiency and uniformity in SAGD steam circulation through effect of heat convection The role of stylolites as a fluid conductive, in the heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs The influence of fracturing fluid temperature and viscosity on the migration and distribution of proppants within a fracture The reservoir screening standard of CO2 huff-n-puff based on orthogonal analysis method and random forest algorithm Identification of the low resistivity-low contrast (LRLC) gas-bearing pay zones in Shaly sand reservoirs using acoustic data: a case study from the Messinian Abu Madi formation, onshore Nile Delta, Egypt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1