Optimization of extraction of liquid extract from microalgae Chlorella vulgaris via cavitation-based techniques

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Food Process Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/jfpe.14665
Fatemeh Jamshidi-Kia, Keramatolah Saeidi, Zahra Lorigooini, Bahram Hosseinzadeh Samani, Rahim Barzegar
{"title":"Optimization of extraction of liquid extract from microalgae Chlorella vulgaris via cavitation-based techniques","authors":"Fatemeh Jamshidi-Kia,&nbsp;Keramatolah Saeidi,&nbsp;Zahra Lorigooini,&nbsp;Bahram Hosseinzadeh Samani,&nbsp;Rahim Barzegar","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.14665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Microalgae are a high-potential source of biomolecules. Therefore, extracting bioactive components from microalgae with efficient and green extraction techniques is an important objective in many research. Cavitation-based extraction is gaining widespread attention as an environmentally friendly method due to its reduced energy and solvent consumption, enhanced extraction yield, improved extract quality, and reduced extraction time to extract bioactive products. This study aims to examine and optimize the extraction method for bioactive products from <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> using Cavitation-based techniques compared with the traditional method to enhance the efficiency of extracting liquid extract. This experiment examined the extraction of bioactive components using various extraction methods, including Maceration, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) (2–8 min) and hydrodynamic cavitation extraction (HCE) (1–5 min) was investigated regarding the extract's minerals, vitamins, amino acids, phytohormones, and total carbohydrates. The experimental design followed a response surface methodology to assess the effects of ultrasound-assisted and hydrodynamic cavitation extraction of liquid extract. The optimum time for maximum content of bioactive components using UAE and HCE was obtained at 7.87 and 1.76 min, respectively. This study showed that in comparing the three methods, Maceration (ME), UAE, and HCE, the UAC method was more useful and had a shorter extraction time compared with the ME and HCE methods for extracting bioactive products from <i>C. vulgaris</i>. Also HCE was more useful compared with the ME method. These results demonstrate that the cavitation-based extraction methods are more effective and efficient than traditional extraction methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical applications</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Extract of Microalgae <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> is a high-potential source of bioactive compounds.</li>\n \n <li>Ultrasonic is one of the most effective techniques for the extraction of bioactive compounds of microalgae.</li>\n \n <li>The Hydrodynamic cavitation technology can be considered a green technology for large-scale extraction of bioactive compounds of microalgae.</li>\n \n <li>The cavitation-based extraction methods are more efficient than traditional extraction methods.</li>\n \n <li>Optimization of the extraction techniques can promote reductions in cost and time.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"47 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.14665","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microalgae are a high-potential source of biomolecules. Therefore, extracting bioactive components from microalgae with efficient and green extraction techniques is an important objective in many research. Cavitation-based extraction is gaining widespread attention as an environmentally friendly method due to its reduced energy and solvent consumption, enhanced extraction yield, improved extract quality, and reduced extraction time to extract bioactive products. This study aims to examine and optimize the extraction method for bioactive products from Chlorella vulgaris using Cavitation-based techniques compared with the traditional method to enhance the efficiency of extracting liquid extract. This experiment examined the extraction of bioactive components using various extraction methods, including Maceration, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) (2–8 min) and hydrodynamic cavitation extraction (HCE) (1–5 min) was investigated regarding the extract's minerals, vitamins, amino acids, phytohormones, and total carbohydrates. The experimental design followed a response surface methodology to assess the effects of ultrasound-assisted and hydrodynamic cavitation extraction of liquid extract. The optimum time for maximum content of bioactive components using UAE and HCE was obtained at 7.87 and 1.76 min, respectively. This study showed that in comparing the three methods, Maceration (ME), UAE, and HCE, the UAC method was more useful and had a shorter extraction time compared with the ME and HCE methods for extracting bioactive products from C. vulgaris. Also HCE was more useful compared with the ME method. These results demonstrate that the cavitation-based extraction methods are more effective and efficient than traditional extraction methods.

Practical applications

  • Extract of Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris is a high-potential source of bioactive compounds.
  • Ultrasonic is one of the most effective techniques for the extraction of bioactive compounds of microalgae.
  • The Hydrodynamic cavitation technology can be considered a green technology for large-scale extraction of bioactive compounds of microalgae.
  • The cavitation-based extraction methods are more efficient than traditional extraction methods.
  • Optimization of the extraction techniques can promote reductions in cost and time.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过空化技术优化微藻小球藻液体提取物的提取方法
微藻是一种极具潜力的生物大分子来源。因此,采用高效、绿色的萃取技术从微藻中提取生物活性成分是许多研究的重要目标。基于空化的萃取技术因其减少能源和溶剂消耗、提高萃取率、改善萃取物质量、缩短生物活性产品萃取时间等优点,作为一种环境友好型方法受到广泛关注。与传统方法相比,本研究旨在研究和优化基于空化技术的小球藻生物活性产品提取方法,以提高液体提取物的提取效率。本实验采用浸渍法、超声辅助萃取法(UAE)(2-8 分钟)和流体动力空化萃取法(HCE)(1-5 分钟)等多种萃取方法对提取物中的矿物质、维生素、氨基酸、植物激素和总碳水化合物等生物活性成分进行了研究。实验设计遵循响应面方法,以评估超声辅助萃取和流体动力空化萃取对液体提取物的影响。使用 UAE 和 HCE 提取生物活性成分的最佳时间分别为 7.87 分钟和 1.76 分钟。这项研究表明,在比较浸渍法(ME)、UAE 和 HCE 这三种方法时,UAC 法比 ME 和 HCE 法更有效,提取时间更短。此外,与 ME 方法相比,HCE 方法更有用。这些结果表明,基于空化的提取方法比传统的提取方法更有效、更高效。超声波是提取微藻生物活性化合物最有效的技术之一。水动力空化技术可被视为大规模提取微藻生物活性化合物的绿色技术。基于空化的萃取方法比传统萃取方法更有效。优化萃取技术可以降低成本,缩短时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
期刊最新文献
Application of Image-Based Features and Machine Learning Models to Detect Brick Powder Adulteration in Red Chili Powder Effects of Egg on Cake Batter Rheology and Sponge Cake Texture Effects of High Pressure and Ultrasonication Pretreatments and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction on Physico-Chemical Properties of Edible Insect Oils Numerical Simulation and Quality Analysis of Carrot Crisps Drying Based on Freezing Pretreatment Cost Estimation for the Preservation of Selected Food/Crop Products With Ozone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1